Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Newton starter vs Bengals, Week 1 starter TBD


Sword

Recommended Posts

Fumbles count?

This is new.

Yes. Fumbles and turnovers DO count when evaluating a QBs play.....

I stated early they don't influence Qb rating.....but a Qb rating isn't all there is to evaluating a QBs play. Unless there is something new I don't know about.......where people ignore what a QB does on the field and only looks at the QB rating.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

RealDeal would have easily won if Moore would have had enough attempts.

The Panthers 1st team (with Cam starting) played so poor and got so far behind that all Matt Moore needed to do was hand the ball off.

Bottom line, don't miss with the RealDeal!

Cough (fan boy) cough

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you have ever watched him roll out and try to hit someone you would know it makes perfect sense...sorry, not bashing but he will throw it in the dirt ever single time...especially if he is rolling to his right.

I have watched him.....

and again, if you don't use designed plays rolling him out.....then you should of never drafted him.

Why do you think for his first NFL snap Chud had him rolling out?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes. Fumbles and turnovers DO count when evaluating a QBs play.....

I stated early they don't influence Qb rating.....but a Qb rating isn't all there is to evaluating a QBs play. Unless there is something new I don't know about.......where people ignore what a QB does on the field and only looks at the QB rating.

the bet was about qb rating, but beyond that, sure fumbles play into evaluating a QB's play, but so too does who that QB is playing with and against... and what mistakes/good plays their receivers made on the ball etc...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A turnover is a turnover. Don't act like moore was flawless when he had the games lone turnover.

Never said he was anything other than "pretty good"

Yes. Fumbles and turnovers DO count when evaluating a QBs play.....

I stated early they don't influence Qb rating.....but a Qb rating isn't all there is to evaluating a QBs play. Unless there is something new I don't know about.......where people ignore what a QB does on the field and only looks at the QB rating.

So incompletions don't count when evaluating QB play? You think when they watch the film the next day they will say "Incomplete pass, no need looking at it..."

This is also new to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the bet was about qb rating, but beyond that, sure fumbles play into evaluating a QB's play, but so too does who that QB is playing with and against... and what mistakes/good plays their receivers made on the ball etc...

I don't care about there silly bet.....and i wasn't talking about there bet.

If they made a bet about who had the best QB rating.....then it was a flawed bet to begin w/ b/c that doesn't = which QB plays better always.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have watched him.....

and again, if you don't use designed plays rolling him out.....then you should of never drafted him.

Why do you think for his first NFL snap Chud had him rolling out?

A lot of people tried to say we should have never drafted him; at least not number one overall anyway, that he doesn't have the passing experience that an NFL QB has to have.

And to answer your question, to have him do things that he does not accel at? I really don't know, after going to three practices and watching the first two games Cam should NOT roll out of the pocket and and try to pass the ball. If he rolls out, he should keep rolling right on up the field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't care about there silly bet.....and i wasn't talking about there bet.

If they made a bet about who had the best QB rating.....then it was a flawed bet to begin w/ b/c that doesn't = which QB plays better always.

In your opinion, who played better? Considering everything?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't care about there silly bet.....and i wasn't talking about there bet.

If they made a bet about who had the best QB rating.....then it was a flawed bet to begin w/ b/c that doesn't = which QB plays better always.

they did and TRD said that over and over, but it was the metric chosen by the other dude so w/e.

imo Moore was the second best quarterback in that game, and I don't think it was close.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So incompletions don't count when evaluating QB play? You think when they watch the film the next day they will say "Incomplete pass, no need looking at it..."

This is also new to me.

Yes, incompletions do count when just evaluting QB play.....

but so do turnovers and they have much more influence.

You know, kinda like you acknowledged Cam's dropped throws or good throws broken up and quickly dismissed them last week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...