Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What would you choose


TheRealDeal

Recommended Posts

Facts: You are a newlywed. You were planning to buy your own house but wedding was more expensive than you hoped so you are going to rent again. Your wife's parents just sold their house and her stepfather got a big promotion in the city you live. He's going to be moving down while the mom works for another year before retiring and moving down full time. Until then she will only come down Fri-Sun.

Option 1: They give you money for down payment on house around 300k. You live there with your spouse and do what you please with it in the future.

Option 2: They buy something in the 500-600 range, you and stepfather fix it up yourselves, try to sell, then make this decision again when it does sell. Father in law makes all mortgage payments, we only pay utilities, food, etc but get 40% split of profits in the end if we go separate ways.

Option 3: They buy something worth up to 850. Something real nice, something near the beach, something you don't need to fix up. Again, they pay mortgage, we pay bills, food, incidentals, etc. We get to save money so we can move out when we choose and the in laws live there after OR if we can afford it, they move on and we take over all payments. This plan would not be one we want to sell but when it does, profits are split again but it might not be for 5+ years. We can live there as long as we want.

Option 1 gets us going and we get to be on our own.

Options 2 & 3 give us a nicer place to live now while being able to save a lot of money setting us up for the future BUT we have to share the place with the inlaws for a while. His new job requires him to work roughly 12-14 hours a day so he won't be there much.

Thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Options 2 & 3 give us a nicer place to live now while being able to save a lot of money setting us up for the future BUT we have to share the place with the inlaws for a while. His new job requires him to work roughly 12-14 hours a day so he won't be there much.

Thoughts?

since when is a house that's worth 300k a shitty place to live

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since it's San Diego.

It's pooty, I know.

OOOH gotcha..that makes sense....

take that option...don't mix money and family...

or get your deposits back...go to city hall and get hitched..have a less expensive reception and then buy your house..it's one day vs a house that you'll live in for a long time...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any time you get caught up in a financial arrangement with relatives it can get sticky. Depends on your relationship with them however... some families can deal with it. Proceed carefully and have any financial agreements made put in writing so there are no hard feelings later...

We get along great.

She'll only be there 2-3 days a week and he works literally all day 6 days a week. We're looking for houses with two master suites either on separate floors or opposite sides of the house.

My wife is also going back to school soon so it'll help because our income is going to reduce.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OOOH gotcha..that makes sense....

take that option...don't mix money and family...

or get your deposits back...go to city hall and get hitched..have a less expensive reception and then buy your house..it's one day vs a house that you'll live in for a long time...

We already got married.

The first option would have to be in an area that I wouldn't want to live either, because in any coastal city, not on the water, but just within city limits, you can't find anything around 300.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has the market turned in San Diego? I know its one of the more price sensitive cities. What the rental market like?

My Fiance and I are buying a house here because the rental market is ridiculous and we could own a house for less than we could rent.

Rent on the beach for 1-2 years save up then buy? Not an option?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We get along great.

She'll only be there 2-3 days a week and he works literally all day 6 days a week. We're looking for houses with two master suites either on separate floors or opposite sides of the house.

My wife is also going back to school soon so it'll help because our income is going to reduce.

Yeah, it's not really the time spent together that would worry me... AND you may have a great relationship NOW, but after living together, even for short periods of time, that can change.

The financial obligations are what has the potential to create the most problems.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, we're looking at everything.

He's coming down today to look at places then hopefully have an offer or two in by this weekend.

A lot of the nicer houses here have dual master suites which would work.

My thinking is this:

He won't be there much

I would rather live in a nice house in a nice community so I don't worry about my wife when I'm not around.

I want to have a nice yard for my two dags.

I want to save money.

Me and him get along great, he's never done me wrong in any way. He likes me and my wife the best because throughout all the family drama, we've had his back and he's had ours, and her sisters can't say the same.

Hopefully it'll get figured out soon. I'm a very simple person, I could live in a cardboard box but now that I have a wife and hopefully starting a family in a year or two, I want them to be safe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Option 1. Money situations with in-laws can be great.... until it is not. And then it is a nightmare.

I am sure you guys are really, really smart with real estate and rehabbing homes but I would suggest you just avoid any type of situation that can go sour. Too easy to play the blame game if the house doesn't appraise where you or your in law thinks it should at the end game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • An odd little vibe I've noticed here of late: some folks are "all or nothing" to an absolutely extreme level when it comes to Bryce. There are, in fact, things Bryce does well. Likewise, there are areas in which he's improved over his time here. He has, on several occasions now, legitimately helped us win games. On the flipside, there have been failures in other areas as well as coaching that we're not in any way his fault.  And finally , it is also genuinely possible that the team may see him as the future, even if we don't. The craziest part, though? It's actually possible that they're right and we're wrong. All of this is true, and more, yet if you accept any of these premises people go from zero to apesh-t in under three seconds 😳 Anything less than total disavowal of Bryce and / or agreement that he's the worst QB of all time and suddenly you're a "stan". Oy 🙄 The reality though?  Bryce is indeed an NFL quarterback. Not a great one, probably backup level good, and I've seen way worse. Now, if you run that statement through your personal Google translator and it comes back with some version of "I want to throw 50 million a year at Bryce for the next 10 years", that's not really my issue it's yours  I don't wanna make him the franchise quarterback, but it's not my call. Win or lose, the team is going to do what they think is best. And as always, if it disagrees with what I think we should do, I'm gonna hope I'm the one who's wrong. Internet clout means nothing. Watching my favorite team win at my favorite sport meas fun 😁
    • I like Icky but he was the wrong tackle to take. Learning run blocking is much easier than learning pass blocking. Cross was pass pro ready. He was the tackle we should have taken without hesitation. 
    • Never saw this angle of the Tyson fight either lol.   
×
×
  • Create New...