Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Anderson

Hairless Cat

By Hairless Cat,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

CarolinaCatBrigade Newbie

CarolinaCatBrigade

Posted
Posted

A probowler sucks - yeah - right-

anyone with half a clue to the game could see Anderson is ready to lead this team now, whereas the 2 and 3 guys arent even close to having his poise - apparently the teams management is willing to let the fans suffer through another abysmal season so we can hope for the future. sorry but Im done hoping for the future - I want to win now damnit! I aint getting any younger!!!!!

Start Anderson!

You new bro? Anderson blew nuts last year, and he had arguably the best receiver in the game to throw to (fitzgerald). He had a terrible QB rating, the worst in the league if I do remember. Do you really think if Anderson was so good that he would be 3rd string on the Panthers roster? of all rosters, behind Jimmy freakin Clausen. He had a good game against practice squad players, but what veteran wouldn't? Put Jake Delhomme behind center against the practice squad and he will easily put up 300+ yards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mav1234 Grand Master

mav1234

Posted
Posted

2nd string for one of them, and the way he was playing he would have moved the ball against 1st stringers as well. Doesn't matter though, he isn't starting. Should he be? We don't know, we never got a chance to see him in camp. Maybe he woulda had a meltdown as the starter :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites
edromeo Newbie

edromeo

Posted
Posted

most polished and best quarterback on the team - by far - he should be starting for us but probably wont - which I dont get.
I think you're mistaking scheme experience and familiarity with talent.

Derek Anderson is what he is and he's certainly not the best QB on this team[Cam].

But, at the same time Derek Anderson knows/played under coach Chudz and has been very productive and executed this offense at a high level before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PackPanther Newbie

PackPanther

Posted
Posted

I do think that Anderson should be the starter, especially at the beginning of the season until the rest of the team really learns our new system. Anderson has experience in the system and I really think that he is like a better form of Matt Moore. While Moore crumbled when he was given the starter, I think Anderson crumbles when he is expected to carry teams to the playoffs. This year he would just be playing because nobody is expecting us to make the playoffs. He could give Newton some time to work on his footwork and learning the playbook. I would just rather not scar Newton right away because he will have to really lead this offense because our defense wont stop anyone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
superduperpanthersfan Newbie

superduperpanthersfan

Posted
Posted

completing 44.5 % of your passes in 2009 kind of cancels the pro bowl out

You gotta consider the surroundings... there was a game he was 2 of 17, one of the worst paper performances by a QB in ages, but he was credited with 11-13 drops. Cleveland's top receiver that year was the rookie Massaquoia(sp?), pretty much all of the receivers were new.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
superduperpanthersfan Newbie

superduperpanthersfan

Posted
Posted

You new bro? Anderson blew nuts last year, and he had arguably the best receiver in the game to throw to (fitzgerald). He had a terrible QB rating, the worst in the league if I do remember. Do you really think if Anderson was so good that he would be 3rd string on the Panthers roster? of all rosters, behind Jimmy freakin Clausen. He had a good game against practice squad players, but what veteran wouldn't? Put Jake Delhomme behind center against the practice squad and he will easily put up 300+ yards.

You do realize that Cleveland dumped Anderson for Delhomme.... how'd that work out?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • DaveThePanther2008
      Panthers OLB Pat Jones II makes bold claim about team's defense

      By DaveThePanther2008 · Posted

      It's not impossible to go from worst to first.  We kept Evero because anyone in there right mind knew our defense was destroyed by injuries, not the scheme.  Evero has been given a plethora of talent between free agency and the draft, not to mention getting DB back. I fully expect our defense to be very good.  I have no reason to think Jones would say something like that unless he truly felt like that.   
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Canes vs Panthers Rd 3 Gm3 8pm

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      We would’ve played Florida and lost in the 1st instead of the 3rd round.  Montreal would have been the 8 seed.
    • Icege
      PFF ranks the 2025 starting QBs

      By Icege · Posted

      I can't get behind a purely subjective re-draft as a method of defining "top-10 QB" status. That invites bias based on vibes/hypotheticals and can ignore actual on-field performance. You and others have said that Bryce has to be a top-10 QB to justify the pick. That's a high bar, which I'm not against, but we need a clear, consistent way to measure it. When I bring up metrics that Bryce has registered in the top-10 in like BTT%, P2S ratio, catchable deep ball rate, etc... they're waved off as either irrelevant or the expected baseline performance. Meanwhile, volume stats like passing yards or win-loss records, both of which depend heavily on roster talent, health, and coaching, are treated as definitive. That's where the inconsistency kicks in. If no performance metric ever counts in his favor and the answer is always going to be "he should be doing that," then we're not evaluating him... we're just holding him to a curve he can't win against. If this is really about performance standards, then let's define them. But if it's just about confirming prior takes based on height and weight, then let's call it what is it and stop pretending that this is a football analysis discussion.
×
×
  • Create New...