Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFC South is the 4th toughest division.


eViL jEsTeR

Recommended Posts

bear with me here, but it's partly perspective. To us, this is the hardest division in football it feels like, but to the teams in our division that have to play us... it, well, isn't.

I'd say we're third or fourth. I think the NFC North is ahead of us, because Minnesota is looking like it's going to rebound strong, Detroit looks great, and we know about the Packers and Bears. I also think the AFC East is ahead of us, because Miami has a crazy good defense and an offense that looks to be gelling, and Buffalo's defense got better this offseason and Fitpatrick is getting better in their system. Overall I think the NFC East is highly overrated and I'd put the NFC South past the NFC East. Hell, I might even put the AFC North past the NFC East because I think the Bengals might surprise some people and they have two of the top five teams in the AFC with Ravens & Steelers IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At least he got the part about Atlanta and New Orleans being Super Bowl contenders correct.:prrr:

Which, other than the AFCE, is the only division to boast two legit candidates. So, with that doesn't he kinda invalidate his own argument?

I think it should be

1. NFCS

2. AFCE

3. AFCN

4. NFCN

5. AFCS

6. NFCE

7. AFCW

8. NFCW

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd say toughest.

Last year we had the NFL's #1 seed, plus two other 10 win teams.

Who else did that?

to be fair both of those teams got bounced in the first round(Atlanta got humiliated at home) and the Buccaneers aren't that great

I think NFCN will be the toughest. Green Bay is a force, Chicago still has a good D and Cutler isn't terrible(he's not that good either), Detroit is on the rise and could very well get a wild card, and Vikings might be alright with McNabb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NFC West - Terrible

NFC North - Loaded

NFC South - Top Heavy. NO ATL

NFC East - Always a war.

AFC West - Chargers are the better team but those division games a brutal

AFC South - Wide open with Manning on the lame. Well, other and Jacksonville

AFC North - Pitt & Balt, Balt & Pitt.

AFC East - Top heavy.

IMO

1) NFC North

2) NFC East

3) AFC West.

4) AFC South

Link to comment
Share on other sites

imo:

1. NFCN

2. AFCE

3. NFCS

4. AFCN

5. NFCE

6. AFCS

7. AFCW

8. NFCW

I think Chicago goes backwards and Minny sucks again, jmo.

certainly possible, I just think we'll see Minnesota better than they were last year (certainly not great, but better) and I see Chicago perhaps taking a step backwards to being in the fight for a wildcard, but I think they'll finish the season very competitive. Part of that is because I'm rooting for Chris Harris to get a ring though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Honestly I haven no idea what I would have even done last night, Edgecomb was the most realistic option to improve our team 
    • He doesn't have the athleticism to play in the NBA. He had the worst numbers of anyone who worked out in this draft. He's legitimately the least athletic player in this draft, which is saying something.   His ceiling is Kyle Korver, with his lack of athleticism he's more likely to be out of the league in 5-6 years like Jimmer Fredette. 
    • Well, he was in probably every NBA franchise's top 6 or 7. Obviously it's nice to take the swing and it work out. But when a guy refuses to work out for your team, is probably the guy refusing to play with LaMelo, has sketchy handlers, etc.? You want...to take that swing? A desperate team does, sure. Which the Hornets are. But a smart team doesn't. Which is what they will hopefully become.  Kon isn't a superstar, but his floor is Kyle Korver. Is that what you want in the 4th pick? Not really, but he's your 4th guy on a good team and what I think Charles Lee wants in a player.  Trade down would've been nice, but for who? Tre Johnson would've been my guy, but he's gone if we trade with Brooklyn. If Washington wanted Ace, I doubt it would've taken much to come get him. Trade down and get Maluach (knowing you're trading Mark) would make sense and may have been the play, but I think Kon helps the team on the court and changing a culture. Not so sure about some of the guys in the 8-12 range. 
×
×
  • Create New...