Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

UPDATE.....On first date for PC :P

pantherschic

By pantherschic,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

YourManInAmsterdam Newbie

YourManInAmsterdam

Posted
Posted

Depends on how possessive the person is.

And how desperate.

Well, from my experience, this is pretty common. I guess it dates back to the idea that you're "courting" someone, it's with the express interest in an eventual marriage.

Obviously, this is archaic in this day and age, but we still seem to hold on to that implied exclusivity for some reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mav1234 Grand Master

mav1234

Posted
Posted

If he didn't actually say anything negative about it, he may just have been kind of bummed it wasn't him who was going out with her, as opposed to him wishing to hoard her all for himself. Obviously without listening in on the conversation, knowing the details of it or the people involved, it's hard to say... but I personally wouldn't immediately assume that disappointment that a girl you've gone on a date with is going on a date with someone else means that person is crazy.

Ehh, he probably is hoping for exclusivity though... just see where he goes with it imo.

oh, and enjoy your date this weekend!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bleys Apprentice

bleys

Posted
Posted

This is true, but the same can be said for women, though. This has happened to me on a few occasions, especially when I was younger. It seems to be a common strategy among passive/aggressive types.

this is to be expected though.. or should I say, not uncommon..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • DamnItJake!
      EVERYONE UPDATE YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS IN YOUR PROFILE

      By DamnItJake! · Posted

      The reset worked with proton.me.. wouldn’t work with my Gmail, Yahoo or Verizon email accounts 
    • KillerKat
       Carolina Hurricanes vs.Vegas Golden Knights  (Stanley Cup Final Game 1) | ESPN on ABC Tuesday, June 2 | 8:00 PM

      By KillerKat · Posted

      Wish they started at 5:30 or 6 at the latest so I can watch it. I have to be in bed by start time.
    • strato
      The running back situation....

      By strato · Posted

      okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
×
×
  • Create New...