Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Week 1's "Step Into My Office"


Proudiddy

Recommended Posts

I, personally, would add Chud to that list as an honorable mention.

His play calling was better than Fox's, but we abandoned the run early. A simple change to unbalanced o-line ups and off tackle runs gave us some daylight, but he didn't keep it up. It could have made a huge difference to our run game had they started using less conventional run plays. There should have been more draws too.

I can't really blame him for abandoning the run, it all goes back to execution. Cards were already coming into the game looking to shut down the run first... Add to that the fact that our fat and useless OL couldn't hold their blocks... Well, there was no where to run unless you cut back. And in Stew's case, he had to break 10 tackles just to get 4 yards. It was pathetic.

Bright side to this? Packers have a lot to think about, and if the OL is worth a sh*t next week, then we should be able to run as they have to respect the pass now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Blitzing is all well and good, but a full house blitz on an empty backfield (ie: empty as in 5 WR sets) Is just f*cking stupid.

Mcdermott should know better.

no way dude i used to to that in madden 98 all the time and id have like 200 sacks with the NT. :willy_nilly:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Blitzing is all well and good, but a full house blitz on an empty backfield (ie: empty as in 5 WR sets) Is just f*cking stupid.

Mcdermott should know better.

Well Im pretty sure someone was supposed to run a check there... Thats why the Beason injury was so bad... no one to command the defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Most EVs are in the 90+ e-MPG meaning some measurement house somewhere compares the EV to a similar ICE model and works out how much is costs to charge (on average) versus fill up as a point of comparison. Talking long term, in the hundreds of thousands of miles?  No clue.  Some early signs are that EV batteries maintain 80% charge over 400k miles.  So there's that.   The challenge and charm of an ICE vehicle is being able to park it under a tree, get your jack stands out and tinker with your engine.  There's just not that same level of complexity in an EV.  I saw someone estimate there are 200 or so moving parts in an EV, and 2000 in an ICE vehicle.  I'm not a part counter so I can't really speak to that. I think that the EV is more the future than any type of combustion engine.  Those will still be around in specific purposes, but for most people - an EV will be the superior option in terms of efficiency.  I say that as someone who loves stupid horsepower numbers out of turbo 4 bangers and inline 6s...  I am one of those tinkers when I can be. A bigger issue for EVs is going to be the ownership versus lease.  Right now, there are INSANE leases on EVs, which is great, but what do you have at the end of that lease?  Nada, maybe some equity if you're lucky.  Where as I'm almost done paying for my car, and plan to keep it until the wheels fall off (or my son wrecks it when he starts to drive).  Will EV makers do the smartphone thing and build in planned obsolesce?  Stop updating software?  I love the tech in EVs, and I think getting more cars and trucks off the road is a good thing.  But I am still just a little concerned.  Capitalism has gotten far too extractive.  
    • Blacksheer's time was up when they drafted Etienne. 
×
×
  • Create New...