Is Cam a "perfect" rookie QB?

[PantherFanForLife]

You've created, what? 4 different threads about Cam Newton during that time span?

Stop. Let the man be.

Because it's what people wanna talk about?

If you wanna talk about something different, then make your own thread or go into a different one. It's that simple.

When did he practice with Brady?

[dksmith17]

He doesn't hold on to the ball too long.

:out:

Did you forget he took 4 sacks? Thats just his style. Think big ben part deux.

[PantherFanForLife]

:out:

Did you forget he took 4 sacks? Thats just his style. Think big ben part deux.

You believe the 4 sacks were a result of him having an "issue" of holding on to the ball too long?

When I say QB issue or flaw, it's something that you believe would define him as a QB. It needed to be seen repeatedly. I saw him hold on to the ball, on a couple of occasions, but out of 24 completed passes, I saw him releasing the ball quickly more than I did him sitting there and waiting.

I don't agree with the Big Ben comparison. I think people say that just because he's a big guy. I actually believe Cam to be far more alert and quicker than Big Ben. Ben's sluggish.

__________________

[Cat'sGrowl]

Because it's what people wanna talk about?

If you wanna talk about something different, then make your own thread or go into a different one. It's that simple.

And there are plenty of other threads to talk about him. You don't have to keep creating new ones. You can post this in any other thread. You're posts aren't any better than anyone elses. Nobody cares more about how you interpret the situation more tan they care about anybody elses. You're just sucking up bandwith because you know if you stick it in another thread nobody will care.

[chef17]

Because it's what people wanna talk about?

If you wanna talk about something different, then make your own thread or go into a different one. It's that simple.

">

[PantherFanForLife]

And there are plenty of other threads to talk about him. You don't have to keep creating new ones. You can post this in any other thread. You're posts aren't any better than anyone elses. Nobody cares more about how you interpret the situation more tan they care about anybody elses. You're just sucking up bandwith because you know if you stick it in another thread nobody will care.

Your derailing attempt is no better than anyone else's. I'm done responding to you unless you wanna talk about the topic.

[Cat'sGrowl]

No thanks, I'll go mention it one of your other 4 threads about the same topic.

[monstercat]

At the end of the day, he missed 5 chances to score from the 11. So no.

Yeah, he should have forced Goodson to catch that pass that would have made it 1st and goal.

[PantherFanForLife]

Yeah, he should have forced Goodson to catch that pass that would have made it 1st and goal.

Goodson did catch the pass if you're talking about the last play.

[monstercat]

Goodson did catch the pass if you're talking about the last play.

No, this was a couple of plays before that. Newton put the ball right in his hands on the 1yd line, and he dropped it.

[panthers55]

Fair enough. But again, I am 100% certain, though others might disagree, that has everything to do with lack of awareness and staring down issue, something that is expected for a rookie QB. Something that will only take a matter of time to fix.

Just as likely is the fact that we have not worked on our redzone packages that much and used some short yardage plays instead. Once we install the whole playbook and work on scoring inside the 10 regularly, we should have better results. We are still working on deciding what works and doesn't work.

[Carl Spackler]

I don't have a problem with PFFL's threads, I just think every time he makes one it should be merged with the rest of them. Title it "Something else about Cam Newton," and put them all together. Cleans up space.

[PantherFanForLife]

No, this was a couple of plays before that. Newton put the ball right in his hands on the 1yd line, and he dropped it.

The one on 1st and 10 to the sideline.