Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mayweather vs. Ortiz


ncmonzta

Recommended Posts

Cool story bro.

Mor 15 years. Just saying the sport is at an all time low and it will not recover.

Sorry bro.oney TKO 8. And that's being very generous.

I was a huge boxing fan for 15 years. I stopped watching when it stopped being good just like the other 80% of the country. It will be under in 10 years tops.

Sorry bro.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was a huge boxing fan for 15 years. I stopped watching when it stopped being good just like the other 80% of the country. It will be under in 10 years tops.

Sorry bro.

I guess I missed the part when it stopped being good. When was this?

I think 240% of the country would agree with me when I say Boxing will still be here in 10 years. See I can pull numbers out of my ass too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess I missed the part when it stopped being good. When was this?

I think 240% of the country would agree with me when I say Boxing will still be here in 10 years. See I can pull numbers out of my ass too.

Boxing is going to die because there is an alternative, and that is MMA. MMA is a more exciting, entertaining, and versatile sport. Boxing is just one element involved in MMA.

MMA is causing the numbers to plummet. However, it doesn't help boxing when there is just not the interest anymore due to lack of guys like Ali, Foreman, Lennox Lewis, Toney, Trinidad, etc. that make boxing worth watching. It just isn't fun to watch anymore. MMA is more aesthetically pleasing.

But, I am a fan of boxing. And I view this fight being all Floyd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ideally Bryce and the other starters should get at least a full quarter and an argument could be made for 2 full quarters given how they've played early in the season the last few years.
    • A rookie that has never played a snap and a proven 1000K NFL WR are not going to be viewed the same in these type rankings.  And calling draft picks, lotto picks, isn't some new quip I just invented.  take the big 3 Hubbard, AT, insert whatever 3rd Panther you want vs Kamara, Hill, Olave.  Most football folks outside of Carolina are picking the Saints there IMO.    
    • You didn’t really address the point, just like you ignored the point about the RBs initially, and saying “they are all lotto picks” is just a really silly reduction because you could say that about literally any player rookie or vet every snap, every game, every year. It is well known that different positions have different hit rates, and I would argue different types of prospects within position groups as well, and that hit rates change the further down in the draft you go. Everybody knows QB is different and that, for example, first round OL have a really high success rate. Using your lotto ticket analogy…again…you are saying a lotto ticket with a 1 in 100 chance of hitting is the exact same thing as a lotto ticket with a 1 in 2 chance of hitting (this is an example, don’t take these odds literally). The point was he is no more of a lotto ticket than the 31yr old receiver coming off a major knee injury, and in my opinion he is better odds with a higher potential “jackpot”. Saying one player is an “lotto ticket” while another isn’t is just not sound logic. You have no idea who will break out, regress, get injured, etc. There are safer bets than others, that’s all. I don’t think Diggs is a safe bet and even if he was, weighing him over all of the Panthers WRs plus 2 1k rushers is just dumb. You can disagree if you want. The list is stupid.
×
×
  • Create New...