Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Yahoo Sports take on Cam Newton and the Packers.


jasonluckydog

Recommended Posts

I looked and didn't see this posted if it has please lock, move or delete. I haven't been here much this week.

http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/players/24788/news;_ylt=AuKCCvoCG4k5iGvYsJXigjr.uLYF

QB Cam Newton "didn't look like a rookie" according to coach Mike McCarthy of the Packers, who has said repeatedly this week that he was impressed with Newton in evaluating film from the Panthers' loss at Arizona last week. But Green Bay coaches gained some valuable insight by the end of Carolina's narrow loss on Sunday on how to prepare for the young quarterback. The Cardinals were liberal at crunch time with their pressure packages and finally had Newton frazzled and making some poor, rookie-esque decisions with the football. He was sacked four times. Defensive coordinator Dom Capers is assertive by nature with his calls but may be compelled to go hard after Newton early in the game so as not to let him get comfortable and into a rhythm on his five-step drops to make the right throws. The Packers will have to get home on those because the Panthers have the ability to create some mismatches down the field with skillful receiver Steve Smith and playmaking tight ends Greg Olsen and Jeremy Shockey.

(Yahoo! Sports)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look for alot of screen plays and draws early and often if Green Bay continues to blitz. Deangelo and Goodson on screen plays are super dangerous.

Half the battle with blitzes is proper play calls and checks.

Completely agree.I thought he did well last week granted he has only been with the system for a month and half. Looking forward to see if Cam will recognize blitzes and make proper checks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look for alot of screen plays and draws early and often if Green Bay continues to blitz. Deangelo and Goodson on screen plays are super dangerous.

Half the battle with blitzes is proper play calls and checks.

I was surprised we didn't use screens more last week. The coaches may be more comfortable going downfield against 1-on-1 coverage than throwing short where it is often more crowded.

A lot of pick 6's come off short throws.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was surprised we didn't use screens more last week. The coaches may be more comfortable going downfield against 1-on-1 coverage than throwing short where it is often more crowded.

A lot of pick 6's come off short throws.

Yeah, and I think Capers is savy enough to bring the blitz with a rb spy...hoping to force cam into poor screen decisions. But..Rivera and Chud might think, instead of run of the mill screens what about fake rb screens to the opposite side to a wr screen. Oh the mind games the coaches probably play...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was surprised we didn't use screens more last week. The coaches may be more comfortable going downfield against 1-on-1 coverage than throwing short where it is often more crowded.

A lot of pick 6's come off short throws.

Cam needs to learn how to sell the screen a little bit better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was surprised we didn't use screens more last week. The coaches may be more comfortable going downfield against 1-on-1 coverage than throwing short where it is often more crowded.

A lot of pick 6's come off short throws.

I agree...I can remember one poorly executed one.That was surprising to me as well

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let GB blitz and bring pressure on Cam. Cam will just do the samething he did to the Cards Secondary last week, burn them. Once GB gets burned enough by Carolina then Capers will back off and play more of a 4 man rush game. Then hopefully that will open the run game for us.

They may not have to with Bell at rt.I cannot understand why they could not find someone with a resume better than an undrafted guy that has been cut by a couple of teams against Clay Matthews.:banghead:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...