Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What happened to Chud in the second half?


KillerKat

Recommended Posts

Amazing that when players start making bad plays (ie 3 int's and a fumble) fans start to blame the coordinators.

When you're calling play after play for Cam to throw it downfield, that maximizes the chances for mistakes to happen greatly. He was calling a good game in the first half, but every play in the second half so far has called for Cam to chug it downfield and we can't win with predictable and risky play calling like that. Nice try, but you fail.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cam has been put in situations as a rookie that Dan Marino could not overcome

At least two of the int's were just bad decisions on his part. Dan Marino probably wouldn't have made those throws. And when Steve Smith fumbled, that was a good call on the part of Chud, Smith just didn't hold on to the ball. Good offense is more about execution than play calling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When your calling play after play for Cam to throw it downfield, that maximizes the chances for mistakes to happen greatly. He was calling a good game in the first half, but every play in the second half so far has called for Cam to chug it downfield and we can't win with predictable and risky play calling like that. Nice try, but you fail.

You don't even know what plays are being called. Ultimately, its up to the qb as to where to throw the ball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You don't even know what plays are being called. Ultimately, its up to the qb as to where to throw the ball.

You don't know football. Come back when you do.

When the receivers are all running downfield, yes that's calling for Cam to throw it deep.

This drive is better though. Calling short pass plays, running the ball, and now Cam is able to throw it long to Naanee for a first down.

However, momentum is all on the Packers side and it's going to be hard to overcome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • And that makes you right. 
    • Mel Kiper said he would retire if Jimmy Clausen wasn't a successful NFL starter too. Just because the experts make a claim doesnt mean it's true either.  Bryce may be a serviceable QB for someone. Serviceable QBs don't bring you a perennial winner or lead you to the playoffs over and over. Serviceable QBs also dont get 50m plus per year deals which is what a Bryce extension would look like.  The stats show he hasn't been even a serviceable QB in the 3 years he's been here. The eye test shows he hasn't put together 2 franchise QB salary games back to back in 3 years.  Complain all you want about people being negative, but people pointing out that Bryce is held to a different standard than anyone else on the team isn't complaining. It's stating the obvious. 
    • We have big bodied WRs and 3 TEs who all have potential and each bring something different to the table. I never saw the need to go out there and try and find a new starting TE.  While it's nice to have a guy like McBride, Bowers, etc, I think a team's better use of the cap is by having TEs on rookie contracts or cheap vets, not having to pay elite TE money.
×
×
  • Create New...