Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What happened to Chud in the second half?


KillerKat

Recommended Posts

Amazing that when players start making bad plays (ie 3 int's and a fumble) fans start to blame the coordinators.

When you're calling play after play for Cam to throw it downfield, that maximizes the chances for mistakes to happen greatly. He was calling a good game in the first half, but every play in the second half so far has called for Cam to chug it downfield and we can't win with predictable and risky play calling like that. Nice try, but you fail.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cam has been put in situations as a rookie that Dan Marino could not overcome

At least two of the int's were just bad decisions on his part. Dan Marino probably wouldn't have made those throws. And when Steve Smith fumbled, that was a good call on the part of Chud, Smith just didn't hold on to the ball. Good offense is more about execution than play calling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When your calling play after play for Cam to throw it downfield, that maximizes the chances for mistakes to happen greatly. He was calling a good game in the first half, but every play in the second half so far has called for Cam to chug it downfield and we can't win with predictable and risky play calling like that. Nice try, but you fail.

You don't even know what plays are being called. Ultimately, its up to the qb as to where to throw the ball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You don't even know what plays are being called. Ultimately, its up to the qb as to where to throw the ball.

You don't know football. Come back when you do.

When the receivers are all running downfield, yes that's calling for Cam to throw it deep.

This drive is better though. Calling short pass plays, running the ball, and now Cam is able to throw it long to Naanee for a first down.

However, momentum is all on the Packers side and it's going to be hard to overcome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • "So much of what the Panthers are going to do next week isn't dictated by their preference, but by what happens above them. That's another benefit of not getting locked into need. For instance, if you're thinking you want a receiver, seeing five or six of them go off the board and reacting by taking the sixth or seventh off your list instead of the first (or second or third) something else isn't necessarily wise." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-back-into-the-weeds-of-the-nfl-draft-bryce-young-charlotte-hornets-mock-draft This is what some don't seem to get, I don't care how many times it is said: You're NOT going to draft an inferior person at one position, just because that position is perceived as, or is in fact, a bigger need. That would basically nullify, or at least lessen, the reason why you set yourself up via free agency to be able to take the BPA/BAP on the board in the first place.  Yes, the process is complex, very much involved and ongoing, but the overall philosophy is not rocket science. You set yourself up in order not to be pigeonholed into taking a lower graded player at the expense of a higher graded one. This is why Morgan, Gantt and countless of others say the same thing. This is why it's just nonsensical to set yourself in a position where you don't have to, but then act like you have to come hell or high water: "Oh, we have to draft [whatever position], and we can't draft [this position]."  I'm good with whatever they do, until proven otherwise, but even then, you have to be mature enough to know that drafting is an imperfect exercise, filled with hits and misses. And, you generally don't know if you've hit, and especially missed, right away. Moreover, like I've said before, sometimes two players--different positions or not--can both be hits on their respective teams, so in that sense, it's not purely about a right or wrong pick as much as it's about putting puzzle pieces together at the time the best way that you know how.  At the end of the day, people are going to believe what they want to believe, but one thing that's true is that what the Panthers do regarding the draft is dependent upon what others do, and what others do can and does change things. That being the case, it's just another reason why you can't go in with tunnel vision. The thought of doing that is preposterous.
    • He is a talented player with a lot of potential but ultimately he is a legend in his own mind and the minds of those who attack on his behalf when people pinpoint inconvenient truths. I could see people being so hostile over him if he actually had that kind of juice but he doesn't. Even in the Heat win LaMelo took 31 shots and was 40%. If not for Coby White's late heroics we would have lost in regulation. The reality is we do have pieces in place to compete in the playoffs but in year 6 and with a supermax and a salary that is only going to increase over the next few years LaMelo Ball simply does not look like a franchise centerpiece that you can go on multiple playoff runs with. Look at someone like Trae Young. His team moved on. And he actually took them to the conference finals. The Hornets are at a crossroads. Very tough conversations need to be had in the offseason.
×
×
  • Create New...