Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So how would you feel about Randy Moss as our new #2?


Ricky Spanish

Recommended Posts

PLEAASEE bring him in. Can you imagine if Cam was throwing Naane's passes to Randy Moss instead? I think its safe to say that he would have a few more completions at critical times.

Moss doesn't like playing with QBs that can't throw, which is why he didn't like Oakland or Tennessee. I'm not sure what happened in Minnesotta because that situation with Childress and Favre was a cluster from the beginning. If he would consent to being the #2 behind Steve then I'd have no problem with it. We are 1-3 and have trouble converting in the redzone. Adding Moss is not going to hurt anything. It could only help in my opinion.

what in the world makes you think that lazy bum is going to do any better catching the ball than naanee.

he won't. he doesn't care anymore. he doesn't want to work for anything. he never has. the dude is a bum. flat out lazy bum. he'll give up on every route.

people think peppers takes plays off but randy moss has been taking whole games off. he's talented for sure, but he's pathetic as a competitor.

he would do us no good. all he would do is make people here frustrated.

keep on dreaming, though. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I say we sign him, tell him that someone in a ______ jersey (fill in color of the opponent that day) said for him to stop his Lexus. Tell him he will not get charged for the joint in his ashtray and have him use his Lexus to bump the person in said jersey, knocking them to the ground, therefore down by contact.

Best chance we have of getting a tackle for minimal yards . . .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • From what I gather, sure it allows you more room in that you can manipulate the cap more due to smaller prorated amounts to fit salaries in, but for cap purposes, you're still on the hook for the money at the end of the day.    "ChatGPT You said: What are the advantages for NFL teams to sign larger signing bonuses? ChatGPT said: NFL teams often use large signing bonuses as a strategic tool in contracts. While they cost real cash up front, they offer several advantages, especially when it comes to salary cap management, player retention, and negotiation leverage. Here's a breakdown of the benefits: ✅ 1. Salary Cap Flexibility Signing bonuses are prorated over the life of the contract (up to 5 years) for salary cap purposes. This allows teams to spread out the cap hit, even if the player receives the money immediately. Example: A $20M signing bonus on a 4-year deal counts only $5M/year against the cap. ✅ 2. Attracting Top Talent Players love signing bonuses because they're guaranteed money paid up front. Offering a bigger signing bonus can sweeten the deal without inflating yearly salaries. ✅ 3. Front-Loading Real Cash, Not Cap Teams with strong cash flow can pay big bonuses now while minimizing the immediate cap hit. Useful for teams trying to build around rookie QB contracts or with flexible cash budgets. ✅ 4. Locking in Key Players Larger bonuses make it harder for a player to be released early due to dead cap consequences. This can create more job security for the player and roster continuity for the team. ✅ 5. Leverage in Restructures Big signing bonuses create future cap hits via proration. Teams can later restructure deals (e.g., convert salary to bonus) to create even more cap space. ✅ 6. Competitive Edge In free agency, a team offering more guaranteed cash up front often wins the bidding war, even if the total contract value is lower than another team's. ⚠️ Key Caveat: Large signing bonuses increase dead cap risk if the player is cut or traded early."   I think that roster bonuses can be a useful tool if you're trying to keep players in by manipulating numbers and spreading the hit over time, but I don't think that it's something that you want to use unless it's "necessary." I don't know that you want to get into signing rookies on roster bonuses, as the bust rate is relatively high.    
    • not even if that team in New Orleans disbands before the first game.  Saw one 2026 mock that had them drafting first next year.  
×
×
  • Create New...