Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

American Horror Story


Jangler

Recommended Posts

I really like it, fx hasn't jacked up any good shows that come to mind as of recently, so hopefully we get a few good season out of it.

However it will be hard for the writters to keep that family in that awful house for too long...we will see how it goes. It feels like a really good horror movie more than a show.

How about that crazy neighbor locking her daughter in the closet, effed up stuff huh?

I could see this being a one season show, like 24 was supposed to be... Nothing wrong with a one season show, more should try it. And it looks like the wife wants out of the house already.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I could see this being a one season show, like 24 was supposed to be... Nothing wrong with a one season show, more should try it. And it looks like the wife wants out of the house already.

Yeah, some shows should do it. Prison Break comes to mind. First season was stellar, after, terrible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to watch tonite! I stayed up late watching ep. 2...like how they are developing the characters. I guess the kid that in therapy is a ghost too. I should have known that from the first one so yeah, DERP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like how they keep flashing back to the past, then incorporating the ghosts into the present.

It still feels too close to Amityville, not that's a bad thing.

They killed off the preg girlfriend, I can't believe that he played along. I would have def called the cops!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what!! he would've lost everything had he done that..the burn dude (also Russell from True blood :) ) is he a ghost or is he real...what's his motive?

Jessica Lang telling the maid, "you're never leaving now" was creepy..think it means that none of those bodies that were back there are moving on???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did like the backstory but I didn't really like the hardcore hallucinations the doctor was having, dunno, just annoyed me for some reason.

as to burn guy I don't think he is a ghost - only he and the crazy blonde woman seem to appear outside the premises of the house.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is this available on-demand? Sounds cool.

Side note, is anyone going to watch the new show Grimm on NBC? I find it intriguing from the previews.

You can watch the episodes in the link in the OP, first two shows are the only ones up right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't think Dave touches the defense. That might be a mark against him but definitely a huge red flag for evero. He refuses to run anything other than soft zone and when you don't get pressure that's an awful scheme
    • You don't have to convince me. I think not picking up the option should absolutely be firmly on the table but I just do not see Tepper and Morgan doing that for previously stated reasons. Therefore I'm not going to bother entertaining the notion. Just hoping we actually get real viable competition. If that doesn't happen at the minimum then my perception of that is complete and utter professional malpractice.
    • It was absolutely a catch, and I can’t believe how many folks were stating, before the NFL’s apology, that the overturn was the right call.  The ultimate question in this case is this: can a player complete a catch with only one hand? Of course, we all know the answer to that question, and it is an emphatic “Yes.” T-Mac maintained complete control with one hand (believe it was the right) while the other came off when the ball hit the ground. The ball was in the same position in the one hand (watch T-Mac’s fingers in relation to the NFL shield on the ball) after touching the ground as it was when it first went to the ground. Going back to the question above, if one hand can establish control, then there was no need for the other to stay on the ball, so long as the ball doesn’t move in that one hand that stays on it   It blew my mind that they overturned this in the first place. This should not be a “We got it wrong on the replay because there wasn’t clear and convincing evidence.” This should have been, “That was absolutely a catch.”
×
×
  • Create New...