Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who to root for week 6 Playoff edition


panther4life

Recommended Posts

If you consider this season over for us already then read no further.

First the obvious and easy ones.. AFC vs NFC games.

Patriots over the cowboys

Bills over the Giants

Now for the NFC battles in order of importance

Us over the falcons

Saints over the Bucs- saints are more likely to win the division and our best shot is at the 2nd wildcard spot

Vikings over the Bears-bears have head to head tiebreaker over us so we need them to fail miserably from here on out and the Vikes are not likely to be any threat for a wildcard spot

Skins over the Eagles-let washington win the east and knock the eagles further out of contention

49ers over the Lions- not as big a deal as the games mentioned above but the logic behind it is the niners seem poised to win the west anyway and either Green Bay or Detroit is on pace to get the 1st wildcard spot if they don't win their division

Now before anybody makes an ass out of themselves let me just say if all goes well if the season ended today the 2nd wildcard spot would go to a team with 2 losses(3 losses if the above happens) and we are very well still alive.

we just need to go on a hot streak starting tomorrow.

in b4 somebody post the playoffs, PLAYOFFS??? video.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you consider this season over for us already then read no further.

First the obvious and easy ones.. AFC vs NFC games.

Patriots over the cowboys

Bills over the Giants

Now for the NFC battles in order of importance

Us over the falcons

Saints over the Bucs- saints are more likely to win the division and our best shot is at the 2nd wildcard spot

Vikings over the Bears-bears have head to head tiebreaker over us so we need them to fail miserably from here on out and the Vikes are not likely to be any threat for a wildcard spot

Skins over the Eagles-let washington win the east and knock the eagles further out of contention

49ers over the Lions- not as big a deal as the games mentioned above but the logic behind it is the niners seem poised to win the west anyway and either Green Bay or Detroit is on pace to get the 1st wildcard spot if they don't win their division

Now before anybody makes an ass out of themselves let me just say if all goes well if the season ended today the 2nd wildcard spot would go to a team with 2 losses(3 losses if the above happens) and we are very well still alive.

we just need to go on a hot streak starting tomorrow.

in b4 somebody post the playoffs, PLAYOFFS??? video.

The Niners over the Lions is going to be the hardest one to happen. Vikes over bears is second hardest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isn't it "whom?"

I would disagree with the Saints. If we are going to the playoffs we need to win 9 games probably. If we win 9 games we will win the division as long as the other teams all beat themselves up. I would rather have a flat division.

Ya your right we have a better chance of the Saints going 4-7 or worse and us beating them in a tiebreaker vs us getting the 2nd wildcard spot.*ends sarcasm*

Did you even think about that post before you made it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ya your right we have a better chance of the Saints going 4-7 or worse and us beating them in a tiebreaker vs us getting the 2nd wildcard spot.*ends sarcasm*

Did you even think about that post before you made it?

I did.

I think statistically we would want the division to all win against each other as opposed to one team running away with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • The worst most dangerous drivers always seem to be the ones who think they are the best drivers
    • Leaving Smitty off of there is a crime
    • The intro to the article talked about how they picked the teams and it wasn't just on overall career, it was a factor, but their peak ability also factored in. He 100% should be on a roster like this, because it was building the best roster from players since 2000, not the best careers during that time. And no matter how you slice it, CMC's peak ability if he could have had a long healthy career would have made him one of the best RBs of all time.  He had back to back seasons with over 1k rushing and 100 catches, with the 2nd of them also having over 1k receiving, that's wild. He's also still only 29 and I think is going to end up playing at least another 5-6 years as he's going to slowly shift into being a slot WR at some point I believe and basically become what Deebo was for the 49ers for a while.
×
×
  • Create New...