Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bryant or Colston?


natty

Recommended Posts

NO has more weapons but brees gets it to colston pretty well. id base my opinion on who i think is going to be on the field longer in this situation. on the field equals more chances so id go with colston.

with austin back, the cowboys have several viable weapons too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NO has more weapons but brees gets it to colston pretty well. id base my opinion on who i think is going to be on the field longer in this situation. on the field equals more chances so id go with colston.

with austin back, the cowboys have several viable weapons too.

hope you listened to me?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I benched Colston but he outscored all my receivers - C. Johnson, Smitty and Dez.

Doesn't matter though my team is beastly. I've already beat my opponent by 40, even though Olsen laid a goose egg, and still have Rice tonight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

nice. i had a rough week with people having bad games and injuries. bradys bye week and i took hasselbeck and he tanked. mcfadden and graham both got injured and olsen no showed for me. the person i played against beat me with just rogers, jennings and the gb kicker as i was on my 3rd/4th options at receiver with b marshal and hayward-bey.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well poo, I'm in the same situation this week. It's a little more important this time as I have to bench Rogers and Forte. Dez vs Philly or Colston vs St. Louis. I have a feeling Dallas won't be passing much and Colston is definitely now Brees' top target.

I think I'm leaning towards Colston.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • There is a Grand Canyon-sized chasm between your opinion and the opinions of most former player hockey guys who do this for a living.
    • I can only imagine the **** eating grins on the committee right now. "Oh, Bama didn't deserve it? Oh, Miami didn't deserve it? Suck it, haters!" lol
    • To say that, is gaslighting, because it isn’t true. I mean, maybe one or two people do that but it isn’t the predominant behavior. Even Frank has given him credit. I think particularly the Rams game. A couple of glowing posts.   I know I have. Gotta be honest about it because if you aren’t it undermines what else you say.  But the degree of how far I go with credit, in terms of it being a projection of future performance? Not very far. Acknowledge it, but require more of it. There is a lot of bad play to offset.    I tried to remain passive while the last 9 games (post ankle injury) played out. It is just really hard when the lows won’t go away. I failed. As high as a couple of those highs were, there isn’t enough.    I know it is premature to just say I want to move on, made my decision after 6 of those games ended up pretty much really good or not good enough, but I have had enough of being patient and letting him show the reality either way.  So in my view, he Could still validate himself to a decent degree if he smokes the last three starts. But also in my view I don’t expect to see it. Maybe one more high quality start, would be my expectation. So yes he could still somehow justify having the job next year. If that happened I still wouldn’t have much faith given the last three years and all that has transpired. Again, there is a lot of bad play to offset. 
×
×
  • Create New...