Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Gamefly


Toolbox

Recommended Posts

Wondering if anybody here that uses them has all of a sudden have games take much longer to get to you?? for 5 years they have always gotten to me in 3-4 days then all of sudden the past 2 games take 6-10 days to get to me.. has something changed? I am not real happy with this and actually ended up renting the game I wanted from redbox.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Which game?

I just started using it and have had two separate mailings come in, both got to me on the 3rd day.

I'm new so I'm not sure, but doesn't the shipping time depend on the availability of the game?

For about 5 years i've always gotten my games 3-4 days and now all of sudden for this to happen is absurd.. so calling the post office about it got me nowhere at all coz they are douchebags.. so I have to assume either somebody stole them or they just lazy assholes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Check under your account which warehouse you receive your games from. Every now and then they'll change them and it will affect how long it takes for you to get games. I use to get them from kentucky and then i got switched to pennsylvania and it took forever and then i cancelled. 10-12 days though someone probably stole the game. If you don't have any history of that then its no big deal and they'll send you the next one right away. After you file 2 I didnt get my games even if you legitimately didn't get them they start getting curious and track them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I use Gamefly. It's nice, but I realize that having one game out at a time isn't that great, may switch to 2 games out. If you beat a game in a week, you're going to wait a week to get the next game under one game out at a time. Too much downtime.

Also, in terms of taking a while to get games, if it's a really new game, you pretty much need to get on the list (like Q it up weeks before it comes out) to get it fast, otherwise you're basically waiting on people that were ahead of you to send it back in (it should tell you availability on the game in question).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I use Gamefly. It's nice, but I realize that having one game out at a time isn't that great, may switch to 2 games out. If you beat a game in a week, you're going to wait a week to get the next game under one game out at a time. Too much downtime.

Also, in terms of taking a while to get games, if it's a really new game, you pretty much need to get on the list (like Q it up weeks before it comes out) to get it fast, otherwise you're basically waiting on people that were ahead of you to send it back in (it should tell you availability on the game in question).

Yeah I always have gotten new games when they come out.. something tells me some new asshole employee stole the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Taking only players from the sheet that are realistically available in or after the listed round, I’d like… 1st: DT Caleb Banks (Styles not realistic) 2nd: LB Jacob Rodriguez 3rd: OT Best available from Bowry, Barber, and Casey 4th: CB Daylen Everette 5th: S Jalen Huskey 6th: RB Adam Randall 7th: IOL Best available from Lemieux, Dawkins, Leausa, and Brose   I know nothing about some of the players listed, but it seems like that would be the best way it could fall for now. I’m sure the list of who we meet will change a ton, and there will also be players we don’t meet with to keep quiet. I’d love to pick up Randall in the late rounds. 
    • Not what I said. They know within the building why we aren't utilizing TEs more. If the rumors were true that we were seriously pursuing a couple of decent receiving TEs that strongly points toward a lack of quality receiving TEs currently on the roster. Does that mean we consider drafting one at 19? I don't know, but it wouldn't shock me and if we did there's only one guy it would be. I wouldn't be surprised at all to see TE drafting somewhere in the first three rounds. 
    • Yeah, I don’t know. Tepper was behind the Bryce selection. Behind firings and hiring over his lack of development.  He doesn’t have to literally tell them their hands are tied for them to know this. It is in the air constantly. The Canales Bryce play calling was even portrayed by more than one person as Canales failing Bryce, instead of Bryce being responsible for his own performance (except when he does well, then it is all him). Now they have an extra coach in, to help the new OC get results from this QB.  The atmosphere is not welcoming to prototypical young QBs that have talent. You get Jake Plummer types or old vets. I think we are stuck. 
×
×
  • Create New...