Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Fox Ball


Panthers128

Recommended Posts

Somewhere, Fox has been having an orgasm for nearly 48 hours now. He can't believe this is working. You know Fox hates having to gameplan around a QB, but he loves being able to run so much. Frankly, the only reason it has been successful is because of the ways the Raiders & Chiefs played it - they didn't play the run. It was bad gameplanning.

Go back and watch those games, neither team stacked the box all game long.

I have to think this is like the wildcat. Eventually, a competent D-coordinator will give the Broncos O a beating and everyone else will borrow that gameplan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

why do people keep emphasizing this as if not being terrible is a good thing in the NFL

at least half the teams every single year finish 7-9 or better. big fuging deal if fox can get to it.

Well if you just look at stats you might reach that conclusion but take into account that Fox went 7-9 after taking over a 1-15 team and went 7-9 in the season after the SB after losing a few all pro players and other starters early in the season and having started something like 1-7. Then look at the year Delhomme went down due to the assault by Tommy John and with a variety of QBs he again managed to get the team to around .500.

He's not Bill Belichek but he's done a solid job of making his teams competitive year-in and year-out. Last year was an anomaly.

This year he's taking over another team coming off a really lousy year and has them in position to win the division. I

Link to comment
Share on other sites

why do people keep emphasizing this as if not being terrible is a good thing in the NFL

at least half the teams every single year finish 7-9 or better. big fuging deal if fox can get to it.

? because he isn't terrible. I never said he was great. Broncos are on pace for a close to 500 year - by definition that is an average coach

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
    • Most elite WRs aren't necessarily burners. Not a lot of elite WRs in the modern era were 4.3 guys. If anything, sometimes it seems like the super fast guys use their speed as a crutch and it hampers their development in the intricacies of route running.
×
×
  • Create New...