Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Lions signed Ugo Chinasa to PS yesterday...

CatMan72

By CatMan72,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

CatMan72 Enthusiast

CatMan72

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Lol and we have Jerome Felton who was in Detroit longer than one month like Chinasa.

Us knowing their offense> > > > them knowing two measly plays on defense.

It's just always funny to me when a team signs a player (especially one they don't need) the week they're facing an opponent for whom that player played. There's nothing wrong with it, it's just funny.

Teams are paranoid, don't underestimate their desire to scout an opponent, even a seemingly inferior opponent. This is one of those "must win" games for the Lions, they don't want to leave anything to chance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CatMan72 Enthusiast

CatMan72

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I think video tape would tell them all they need to know at this point in the season. We are what we are.

The tape won't tell you everything... Chinasa was around long enough to know our defensive playbook pretty well and to practice against our offense, that makes him a valuable (cheap) asset heading into the game on Sunday. Teams are always looking for an edge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jtnc Newbie

jtnc

Posted
Posted

The tape won't tell you everything... Chinasa was around long enough to know our defensive playbook pretty well and to practice against our offense, that makes him a valuable (cheap) asset heading into the game on Sunday. Teams are always looking for an edge.

I doubt he knows our defense well, the playbook was pretty hard to grasp even Beason admitted it was complicated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Joe Bear
      Okay, now face the facta guyd

      By Joe Bear · Posted

      No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • ForJimmy
      JJ Jansen on tanking

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
    • HaricotVert
      Potential changes to playoff seeding

      By HaricotVert · Posted

      I dont buy the idea that it would create more competitive games Given this: Seed Current Format Record Proposed Open Seeding Record 1 Lions 15–2 Lions 15–2 2 Eagles 14–3 Eagles 14–3 3 Buccaneers 10–7 Vikings 14–3 4 Rams 10–7 Commanders 12–5 5 Vikings 14–3 Rams 10–7 6 Commanders 12–5 Buccaneers 10–7 7 Packers 11–6 Packers 11–6 That would mean Wild Card round would have been Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Vikings(14/3) v Bucs(10/7) Commanders(12/5) v Rams(10/7) Instead of Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Bucs(10/7) v Commanders(12/5) Rams(10/7) v Vikings(14/3) Then with the reseed it would mean that highest remaining seed would always draw the lowest remaining team.
×
×
  • Create New...