Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

has anyone actually ever clicked on those elevation church banners


Fiz

Recommended Posts

I would argue that it does matter, in this day and age at least. You have to be able to reach people, in America, in the 21st century. Christianity's great advantage, through history, has been its ability to change and evolve without changing its tenets one bit. This is just another form of that.

i guess the question is, where do you draw the line?

you don't want to be in some dusty warehouse yelling at the crowd because you didn't want to spend any money on a PA system. on the other hand spending truckloads of cash on the building is pointless because the people who are already in church aren't the ones that that need to be reached with jesus' message.

how do you strike that balance?

where do you draw that line?

my church has a serviceable sound system but the vast majority of our funds go towards community outreach, feeding the homeless, pumping resources into the foster care program, etc. we rent out a elementary school auditorium on sundays to avoid spending money on a building that we don't actually need.

not knocking the discipleship-centered model buuuuuut who are the ones jesus really calls us to go after?

just a thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i guess the question is, where do you draw the line?

you don't want to be in some dusty warehouse yelling at the crowd because you didn't want to spend any money on a PA system. on the other hand spending truckloads of cash on the building is pointless because the people who are already in church aren't the ones that that need to be reached with jesus' message.

how do you strike that balance?

where do you draw that line?

my church has a serviceable sound system but the vast majority of our funds go towards community outreach, feeding the homeless, pumping resources into the foster care program, etc. we rent out a elementary school auditorium on sundays to avoid spending money on a building that we don't actually need.

not knocking the discipleship-centered model buuuuuut who are the ones jesus really calls us to go after?

just a thought.

I think you don't have to pick and choose. I'm going simply by Newspring, since that's the church I attend. They started with a group in a living room, then something like an auditorium, then the Sullivan Building in Anderson University, finally a multi-million dollar building in Anderson. They funded this venture entirely by donations and generosity of the congregation, BUT they could have never gotten the funding at all had the congregation grown to thousands upon thousands of people. And now I think the attendance is 15,000 with something like 7,000 salvations over the last few years, and I cannot say with any honesty that that would have occurred without all the affectations.

I guess it depends on your definition of need. Do we "need" the sound system and the three-thousand seat church and the huge screens? I don't guess we do. However, have THOUSANDS of people come to Christ because of them. I fervently believe that yes, they have. And in my mind, that makes them completely worth it.

It's certainly not the only model, and maybe not even the best, but I think it has done great things.To sort of bring it back to the OP, Elevation runs along the same lines of Newspring, so I think it's fair to compare the two. Newspring/Elevation have been able to minister, do missions, AND build large buildings because their congregations believe in Christ and tithe like they're supposed to...like I said at the beginning, I don't think it necessarily has to be a one or the other thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Elevation's a nice church; Steven Furtick's preached at NewSpring and couple of times and he seems like a great guy, very well spoke and very passionate.

on the other hand, he's convinced people to pay him to talk about a magical sky monster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Saw this show up in my new feed. Nice to see a couple of our rookies making it into the top 5 so far, even if it is a pff measure... From https://www.pff.com/news/nfl-top-15-rookies-week-9-2025 ... 4. TE Mitchell Evans, Carolina Panthers (78.7) Evans struggled in the Panthers’ tight win over the Packers, finishing with a 41.8 PFF overall grade — third worst among tight ends this week. He was not targeted in the game and played only one snap in pass protection. He did log 15 run-blocking snaps, and although he earned a 68.9 PFF run-blocking grade in zone looks (seven snaps), his 39.0 mark in gap schemes (second worst for the week) dragged him down to a 46.6 PFF run-blocking grade overall — sixth worst for the week. Despite seeing zero targets over his past two games, Evans still leads the Carolina tight end group with a 74.3 PFF receiving grade. He has caught all nine of his targets for 90 yards, six first downs and two touchdowns. Evans also leads the Panthers’ tight end group in PFF run-blocking grade (72.2). He has recorded a 20.5% positive play rate across 175 snaps.  5. WR Tetairoa McMillan, Carolina Panthers (78.6) McMillan had a better day against the Packers, recording four catches for 46 yards. Most of that production came in the first quarter via two 16-yard catches — one of which he snatched from Carrington Valentine’s hands, who was in perfect position to break up the pass. McMillan accounted for three first downs on the day, although Green Bay was able to limit his impact after the catch, holding him to 0.8 yards after the catch per reception. McMillan now has 41 catches for 558 yards — a top-15 mark. He is also tied for second with 19 explosive gains of 15-plus yards. Three of McMillan’s catches against the Packers came between the numbers, bringing him to 22 for 318 yards and 19 first downs (tied for second most) this season. He owns a 26.1% threat rate and a 76.6 PFF receiving grade between the numbers. He also ranks in the top 10 in explosive gains (10) and yards after the catch per reception (5.5) within that area of the field. 
    • At least we don't need to hear overreacting about towels ...
    • Actually there is, try being a Charlotte Hornets fan. I mean the team fuging moved at its peak and hasn't recovered since and that was 25 years ago
×
×
  • Create New...