Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dwight Howard Trade Watch....


C47

Recommended Posts

is officially on...

Dwight Howard's agent, Dan Fegan, tells SI that the Magic gave Howard permission to have contact with several teams to explore his options

And several....means three...

WojYahooNBA Adrian Wojnarowski

The agent for Dwight Howard, Dan Fegan, tells Y! Sports that Orlando has given Howard permission to talk to three teams.

I know two:D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Orlando PR man Joel Glass calls to say D. Howard's agent now has permission to speak w/Lakers/Nets/Mavs about possible trade

https://twitter.com/#!/ESPNSteinLine

FWIW

Stephen A Smith radio show on 710 ESPN just said his source said that the plan was in place for cp3 and d12 to come to the Lakers. It was a package deal. It was already to go. CP3 and Dwight had talked about it and that was the plan.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure it's going to happen, but it's looking like the dream team in L.A. is still a very distinct possibility. It will come down to how vocal Dwight is, and who the Magic like better, Brook Lopez or Andrew Bynum....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's telling that the Nets (D12's preferred destination if you listen to the media) are desperately trying to get Nene under contract....

http://www.iamagm.com/news/2011/12/10/nets.increase.offer.nene.four.years.70.million?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter

Nene, the top center left in free agency, is reportedly pushing for a max contract and could get the most money by re-signing with the Nuggets. But after the Nets missed out on free agent Tyson Chandler, who agreed to a deal with the Knicks, they upped the offer for Nene to four years, $70 million, according to a source.

Not gonna have money for Howard and Hedo's contract if they ink Nene to that kind of deal....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Marc Stein: Mavs' first swipe, I'm told, will be trying to do S-and-T w/Sacramento for Dalembert by using big trade exception from Tyson Chandler deal

Would more than likely take Dallas out of the D12 sweepstakes as the trade exception would be used to absorb Hedos terrible contract...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMO Lopez isn't much of a downgrade from Bynum. Plus they have enough cap room to take on Turkoglu.

According to WoJo there are a couple reasons he wants NJ:

1. Good freinds with Williams

2. Wants to be the centerpiece in Brooklyn

3. Doesn't want to follow Shaq's footsteps from Orlando to LA

He probably would sign an extension with LA if he is traded there, so it really comes down to who can put together the best package.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I would say that he's pulling things out of his ass to get people to visit his site.
    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
×
×
  • Create New...