Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Steve Smith takes Cam over Tebow anyday.


PantherBrew

Recommended Posts

-Drive 1 defense: Defense got a red-zone FFR and took away the Texan's first drive. W+

-Drive 1 offense: We scored. W

- Drive 2 defense: stop on the second drive W

- Drive 2: Offense responded with a stall. F

- Drive 3 offense: scored touchdown. W

-Drive 3 defense: stopped W

-Drive 4 offense: stalled F

-Drive 4 defense: Interception W

-Drive 5 offense: score W(Fumblerooskie!)

-Drive 5 defense: stopped W

1st half defense: Perfect + on every drive.(2 takeaways)

1st half offense: A (scored on 3, failed on 2. not good enough for A+ or perfect but still a great half)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Complete team win today.....needed in several games this year....regardless of your agenda....

Not quite. Superb defensive game. Passable offense. Bad special teams defense. Ok special teams offense. A complete team win is when they all do good. We were imbalanced.

A W is what matters. But really we should be able to put up 28 points even without 3 takeaways. When we start winning 35-30 like the offense we're built to be, then we are doing what we are supposed to be doing.

You guys should really check into Air Coryell and see what we're supposed to be. Defenses were not the stars. When you do it right, defense doesn't carry you. You're not the most efficient offense in the league, but you act like a V8 should. You run hard and fast until you run out of gas, not marathons and today was that. Chud's still trying to figure it out I think. A few nice trick plays today though.

Anyone watching The Golden Calf of Bristol-Brady btw? They just scored again on the Pats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, if our offense was just passable, and we had a YPP of 11.28, does that mean that Green Bay's offense this year has been just passable?

Our offense was pretty good today, especially in the first half, but also in the 4th quarter. 3rd quarter was rough, but it was for our defense, too. Sure, we got turnovers, but every team gets turnovers... and one of those turnovers sealed the game so it's tough to complain about us not putting up enough points from turnovers when it allowed us just to run out the clock, especially when we then moved the ball like 75 yards, and took a knee to end the game. Coulda had more than 28, but we ended the game instead.

We had no punts in the 4th quarter and two huge drives. Only one resulted in points, but the other was just as important to the outcome of the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not quite. Superb defensive game. Passable offense. Bad special teams defense. Ok special teams offense. A complete team win is when they all do good. We were imbalanced.

A W is what matters. But really we should be able to put up 28 points even without 3 takeaways. When we start winning 35-30 like the offense we're built to be, then we are doing what we are supposed to be doing.

You guys should really check into Air Coryell and see what we're supposed to be. Defenses were not the stars. When you do it right, defense doesn't carry you. Chud's still trying to figure it out I think. A few nice trick plays today though.

Anyone watching The Golden Calf of Bristol-Brady btw?

Great defense, great offense, acceptable ST's, good coaching.....That's a complete win here. Pedestrian ST play will do the job here....I'll take a win in an away game versus a team in contention for the #1 seed regardless of their situation...We've been imbalanced all year....
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, if our offense was just passable, and we had a YPP of 11.28, does that mean that Green Bay's offense this year has been just passable?

Our offense was pretty good today, especially in the first half, but also in the 4th quarter. 3rd quarter was rough, but it was for our defense, too. Sure, we got turnovers, but every team gets turnovers... and one of those turnovers sealed the game so it's tough to complain about us not putting up enough points from turnovers when it allowed us just to run out the clock, especially when we then moved the ball like 75 yards, and took a knee to end the game. Coulda had more than 28, but we ended the game instead.

We had no punts in the 4th quarter and two huge drives. Only one resulted in points, but the other was just as important to the outcome of the game.

I don't know I didn't watch them but probably. By the numbers they looked bad right before the end but I didn't check them. Watching The Golden Calf of Bristol now:)

Already went through all that in the other thread so not gonna do it again. I promise you even a week from now you'll agree my emotions didn't get the best of me during the game and it's pretty objective: http://www.carolinahuddle.com/forum/carolina-panthers/74367-quick-team-grades-congratulations-panthers-on-first-win-over-a-winning-team.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3098993205_515ff24398.jpg?v=0

Really, I love how so many of you just make comments, and offer no explanation. That is graph is 1st down scoring plot. I know this, because I've seen them before. It's not an overall scoring % plot.

It's telling you the likelyhood of scoring a FG or a touchdown if you have a 1st down at that particular location. Naturally if you a 1st down at that location, you're far more likely to go for a touchdown, not a FG.

If you actually plot scores, both of them combined, all you get is one exponential line. It's just another graph Teeray posed that tries to twists facts and try to argue a turnover in your red-zone isn't a killer. Scoring % increases for both touchdowns and FG's the closer you get the the end zone. They never decrease.

Wow...you're not only slow on the uptake, you're slow on the delivery as well...Let me fill you in on what you missed...shocker...Field goal likely-hood decreases as you close in on the goal-line. Imagine that.....seems like the people who have difficulty digesting the reason for that would also have trouble interpreting that graph...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's telling you the likelyhood of scoring a FG or a touchdown if you have a 1st down at that particular location. Naturally if you a 1st down at that location, you're far more likely to go for a touchdown, not a FG.

Yeah, depends on where you start...."far more likely"? What are you talking about?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, if our offense was just passable, and we had a YPP of 11.28, does that mean that Green Bay's offense this year has been just passable?

Our offense was pretty good today, especially in the first half, but also in the 4th quarter. 3rd quarter was rough, but it was for our defense, too. Sure, we got turnovers, but every team gets turnovers... and one of those turnovers sealed the game so it's tough to complain about us not putting up enough points from turnovers when it allowed us just to run out the clock, especially when we then moved the ball like 75 yards, and took a knee to end the game. Coulda had more than 28, but we ended the game instead.

We had no punts in the 4th quarter and two huge drives. Only one resulted in points, but the other was just as important to the outcome of the game.

Third quarter was to see what the defense was really made of. It seems that the offense have been putting up points in the first half and the defense have been giving it all back in the third qrter.

To see the defense hold the Texans to just two fgs throughout the entire 3rd qrter is DAMN well impressive. The best defending this game has done in 14 weeks. They did come to life last week. If the fg was made by Mare and the offense had gotten just one more td, last week's game would have been yours.

If this team continue to play the way they did today, you guys will have a lot of celebrating and boasting to do next season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, I could jump right into the unbelievable Bryce debate now that some people are trying to flip the script because Bryce Young has, at most, a handful of decent games as a pro, but that's going to work itself out. Suffice it to say that I've seen better QBs (with an s) in a Panthers uniform, and I've certainly seen better QBs be drafted while we're playing around with Bryce, one of them who beat the crap out of us already this season... Let's forget about Bryce (and his markedly underwhelming play since he's been here); I think that most sane fans will agree that drafting him was an error, but it happens. Sure, it doesn't happen to the tune of King's ransom---including your main receiver---but it happens. You bet, you lose. Speaking of receivers...and betting and losing... Oh, man, we drafted Xavier Legette. Yes, just like with Bryce, I've entered "the dark side." Some Huddlers were telling us from the beginning, and they were right. But, I'm not apologizing for waiting to see what a guy's got before making my decision on him. X was a one-year wonder at South Carolina who parlayed some really nice production that season, a great personality and thick country accent, into becoming a first round pick (but only in Carolina). For Dan Morgan and company, He was a big swing that has turned into a big whiff (and I can still feel the ill breeze from that one). Sh¡t happens, right? Well, not so fast. Ladd McConkey was the decidedly more polished receiver who was literally ready to hit the ground running as soon as stepping onto the field as a pro. Ladd was never the biggest guy (though not the smallest), but he was the guy that could run routes, always seemed to get open---no question---and had the same speed as X, but with legit quickness and nuanced shake and bake. But Dan chose the project. He chose the guy where the game speed looks more like a tractor trailer than a 5.0 mustang. Look, I've supported X (just like Bryce) many many a day, but no more. Now I'm not saying that I won't root for the guy. Just like with Bryce, he seems like a great kid. But as far as giving excuses for the kid, and, perhaps more importantly, waiting for some miraculous breakout, I'm done with that. I've seen enough. You don't draft a project for a project. And yes, Bryce had proven to be a project after his first season. In my mind, drafting a supposedly number one receiver that needs lots of development for a starting quarterback that needs immediate help to try and further his development is not going to lead to good things. Pick the surest guy. Or at least pick the one who appears to be the surest guy, because picking can be tricky... especially when you're too busy tricking yourself. 
    • Winning ain't gonna make my eyes lie to me. Context matters, and it will always matter in the game of football.
    • That TD pass to Legette against Miami. Elite. The play where Bryce rolls right to buy time until Tet can reverse field.  Bryce pumps as multiple defenders close in.  He barely gets it away before he takes a big time hit.  Beautiful off platform throw and great catch by Tet.   The second TD to Tet against Dallas where Bryce dips and turns his shoulder in to evade the pass rusher.  Resets and finds Tet in the end zone. Dude embodies the Keep Pounding mantra.  
×
×
  • Create New...