Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Draft Positioning


MHS831

Recommended Posts

To help you enjoy Sunday even more (could not find this anywhere--figured it should be a thread). This is speculative (of course), because it is based on this week's overall opponent win percentages. I would say it is pretty accurate, however.

IF THE PANTHERS WIN, the worst they can do is draft 13th. The best is 11th. Arizona is favored, so odds are they would have the 12th selection. Pull for the Cardinals to beat the Seahawks at home.

IF THE PANTHERS LOSE, the worst they can do is draft 9th. The best they can do is 8th. Miami is favored by 1 over the Jets at home, so pull for the Dolphins to beat the Jets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is where they stand now. Root for the Panthers, and the Dolphins and the Cardinals. ALthough I do not think beating the Saints bench means much--if we beat their starters, then I agree that the win is significant.

Order Team Record Schedule strength

1 Indianapolis Colts 2-13 .552

2 St. Louis Rams 2-13 .571

3 Minnesota Vikings 3-12 .565

4 Cleveland Browns 4-11 .515

5 Jacksonville Jaguars 4-11 .529

6 Tampa Bay Bucs 4-11 .545

7 Washington Rskins 5-10 .476

8 Miami Dolphins 5-10 .511

9 Carolina Panthers 6-9 .482

10 Buffalo Bills 6-9 .498

11 Kansas City Chiefs 6-9 .516

12 Arizona Cardinals 7-8 .476

13 Philadelphia Eagles 7-8 .500

14 Seattle Seahawks 7-8 .509

15 San Diego Chargers 7-8 .516

16 Chicago Bears 7-8 .556

17 Tennessee Titans 8-7 .453

18 Dallas Cowboys 8-7 .467

19 New York Jets 8-7 .502

20 Oakland Raiders 8-7 .507

21 New York Giants 8-7 .518

22 Denver Broncos 8-7 .524

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought Carolina could pick 9th even with a W over NO :confused:

If Buffalo beats New England in Foxboro and Kansas City beats Denver at Denver, but if not, if we beat New ORleans, these teams jump us. If Arizona loses, they jump us too. Arizona, however, is favored by 3 over Seattle at Arizona.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like Christmas in April as much as the next guy, but anyone that even thinks about being OK with losing for the sake of the draft needs to turn their fugging fan card into TRD right now!

Who said that? If you think beating New Orlean's practice squad calls for a macho parade down Trade Street and we lose a chance at a top OT or CB, then pound that chest. If we play their starters then it means something. If not, it is a sister kisser.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who said that? If you think beating New Orlean's practice squad calls for a macho parade down Trade Street and we lose a chance at a top OT or CB, then pound that chest. If we play their starters then it means something. If not, it is a sister kisser.

Not hardly dude. If they bench their starters then I wanna see us hang 50+ on them and then have Rivera walk to Payton after the game and whisper in his ear, "Not even Brees can save you any longer!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not hardly dude. If they bench their starters then I wanna see us hang 50+ on them and then have Rivera walk to Payton after the game and whisper in his ear, "Not even Brees can save you any longer!"

I see that, to a degree from a fan perspective, but it would mean more to you than the players. They are not getting pumped over 50 points when they know it is a glorified scrimmage against bench warmers. I would not even feel that great about a 50 point win over the Saints bench.

Then select the first option and pull for Arizona as well. One of the two scenarios is going to happen, and it should be interesting just to know where we would draft either way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see that, to a degree from a fan perspective, but it would mean more to you than the players. They are not getting pumped over 50 points when they know it is a glorified scrimmage against bench warmers. I would not even feel that great about a 50 point win over the Saints bench.

Then select the first option and pull for Arizona as well. One of the two scenarios is going to happen, and it should be interesting just to know where we would draft either way.

To be fair, half of our team (*caugh* DEFENCE *caugh*) are "bench warmers".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who said that? If you think beating New Orlean's practice squad calls for a macho parade down Trade Street and we lose a chance at a top OT or CB, then pound that chest. If we play their starters then it means something. If not, it is a sister kisser.

I would much rather win and build confidence for the current team than throw away a game for an unproven commodity.

Your comment about the "New Orleans' practice squad" makes me chuckle though, especially with how some "fans" here have consistently devalued the teams' wins this season. Carolina wins a game, it's because of some deficiency on the other team. Yet, when Carolina loses, I see posts that look like they've been typed with one hand and eyes full of tears.

I just can't see how it's possible to undermine the value of a Carolina victory. Two of the 3 starting LBs done since early on, starting DT down, rookie QB, two rookie DTs, revolving door @ #2 CB, rookie head coach, new coaching staff, no offseason, etc. Yet, nobody seeks to undermine an opponent's victory at worst. At the very least, the fact that the team is starting to gel together the way it is, and the way they've gone from one of the worst to one of the best offenses without that offseason and all of the other question marks is pretty fuging impressive O_O

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...