Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2012 mock offseason and draft.


DaCityKats

Recommended Posts

Bump anybody interested in getting a team?

* Arizona Cardinals- Gin and Juice

* Atlanta Falcons- jb online

* Baltimore Ravens- (╯°□°)╯︵

* Buffalo Bills- RadioKiller

* Carolina Panthers- CaliPanthers

* Chicago Bears- DoubleTrouble34

* Cincinnati Bengals- JawnyBlaze

* Cleveland Browns- jramsey4

* Dallas Cowboys- WolfpackPantherMan

* Denver Broncos- Miaoww

* Detroit Lions- pantherman95

* Green Bay Packers- Jackofalltrades

* Houston Texans- adub2b23

* Indianapolis Colts- carpanfan96

* Jacksonville Jaguars- llalliweid

* Kansas City Chiefs- X-Clown

* Miami Dolphins- MusikmanLP7

* Minnesota Vikings- RedMage138

* New England Patriots- DaCityKats

* New Orleans Saints- kman72

* New York Giants- Kevin Greene

* New York Jets-C42[)14C C47

* Oakland Raiders- CaliPanthers

* Philadelphia Eagles- Ken

* Pittsburgh Steelers- Bj-Monster23

* San Diego Chargers- jamos14

* San Francisco 49ers- ZackAttack23

* Seattle Seahawks- BigBeast52

* St. Louis Rams- ROCKnROLLA

* Tampa Bay Buccaneers- X-Clown

* Tennessee Titans- CamToSmithTD

* Washington Redskins- CatMan72

UPDATED.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

obviously I would be interested in the Panthers first and foremost (like all of us), but I'm definitely in for representing a team for this. Are we doing trades involving players or no? If so, we probably need to appoint a committee to veto trades so there are no ridiculous deals sending someone like Phillip Rivers or Aaron Rogers packing....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

obviously I would be interested in the Panthers first and foremost (like all of us)' date=' but I'm definitely in for representing a team for this. Are we doing trades involving players or no? If so, we probably need to appoint a committee to veto trades so there are no ridiculous deals sending someone like Phillip Rivers or Aaron Rogers packing....[/quote']

Yes to player trades and we should have a group to veto BS trades.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i'll take the rams but i don't feel like running the thing again.

as far as the FA bidding that added a whole extra 1-2 weeks worth to the thing. i think it'd be better to either use the actual NFL free agent moves or b) use some blind bidding system where you can just submit all the FAs you want and what $$$ you bid for them and then use the rules/system to figure out who gets who. that way you don't have to bid, get outbid, rebid, checking back over and over for days, ect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

can't really get everyone online all at once. that's why last year we had to let people bid then give the top bid a few days to sit there, let people get online to outbid if they want, before pushing it through. that just makes it take forever though, which is why i said blind bidding system if anything.

i wouldn't mind just going by the actual NFL FA moves this year though, as it'll actually be before the draft like normal

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if you could actually set a time/date and get all 32 teams owners into a chat at once that would work as well. name a player, people bid bid bid, going once, twice...gone! move on to the next player... might take an hour or two but it'd be done with rather than stringing out the bidding for weeks. only thing is i'm not so sure you can get the majority of 32 people to show up all at once

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean we had more of a defensive need in the 2025 draft than we may in the 2026 draft(so far). But we took a TE. We did it in the 5th round. Also he has overwhelmingly been our best TE to date. He and the FA pickup. I think you just have an extremely skewed view of TE's in the NFL. I would implore you to take a look at some draft history, depth charts and career progressions of a lot of those players. You are going to see ample examples of lower round guys being drafted and then immediately starting at TE. The reason it isn't rare is that there aren't many TE's taken in the 1st at all.  It's the same with other positions. You think that it's impossible to find a C outside the 1st? Well....most of them aren't 1st rounders because they rarely get taken there. How about OG? The NFL is mostly non-1st round OG's and the elite tier is almost all not former 1st round OG's. How about RB's? Pretty similar right? That's not just numbers, it's positional value historically. High value positions litter the first round. It's always been that way.
    • The "mob" was into a lot of things back in the day. They were fixing fights mostly but branched out into illegal gambling and booze during prohibition. Points shaving was mostly attributed to the coaches or players themselves but I'm sure the mob had a hand in it themselves. But they were making more money in the drug market than they could with gambling by the 1980s and gambling was getting legalized.
    • Didn’t the canes beat the Stars both times last year and once the year before?  We kinda own them. 
×
×
  • Create New...