Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Adjustments


ladypanther

Recommended Posts

For the season, Carolina outscored its opponents in the first quarter (plus-13) and in the second quarter (plus-31). But they were minus-7 overall in the third quarter and then a staggering minus-60 in the fourth. There's the difference in the season.

http://scottfowlerobs.blogspot.com/2012/01/on-cam-polian-and-nfl.html

So....generally the Panthers were toast after halftime. Seems other teams made adjustments and the Panthers did not?

Is this about having young players? New coaching staff?

Do you think this will be a worry in the future? It has haunted our past.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bad defense got worse in the second half in most of our games.

This lead to pushing the envelope more with a rookie QB.

I thought several times this season the second half woes could be the offense trying to shorten the game (especially if we had a lead) b/c they knew the defense was going to give up points.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Three things, inexperience, chemistry and failure of the defense. Form the team to the coaches. Young players getting to know the professional game. Getting to know one another, coaches getting to know our team and team needs for their future plans. Seems to me that finishing a game was heavily reliant on the defensive playing. Rarely an offense can keep pace with the worst defense in the league and our offense thrives off momentum, to know you have to put up 30, 40+ points to be in a game is tough.

While there are a few things all playing a role in the Panther's inability to finish games, if you want to narrow it down to one main thing I think once our defense steps up you'll see us finish out games with more momentum. In the meanwhile chemistry and experience are something only time gives. Cam's 'stupid' rookie mistakes will eventually subside as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hidden

watching the game I've seen obvious adjustments at certain points in the game.

the idea that the 2nd half has some major twist in the game plan just isn't the case.. adjustments are occurring after every drive, hell- every play.. when the run game gets stuffed, the OC adjusts his calls.. when the QBs passes are sailing on him, the OC adjusts his calls...

most of the adjustments I've seen come at times when Cam is trying to hard or just not in rhythm.

I believe the stat is we've been up by 21 points 12 out of 16 games? (can't remember, but you all get the point).. those stats in the 2nd half actually prove that Chud is adjusting to run out the clock more often than not..

I've seen Cam struggle the most in the 3rd quarter, and more often than not you see more screens and shorter passes when Cam is called to pass...

Link to comment

as most people have referenced, we've been up well over 75% of the games we've played.. IIRC, we've even had a 21 point lead in 12 out of 16 games.. (can't remember the exact stat)

but I'd like to address the idea that the 2nd half is built around any major adjustments. Aside from being up a lot of points and noticing a major adjustment in play calling (directed more towards running the ball, wasting time), adjustments are occurring after every drive, hell- every play.. when the run game gets stuffed, the OC adjusts his calls.. when the QBs passes are sailing on him, the OC adjusts his calls...

most of the adjustments I've seen come at times when Cam is trying to hard or just not in rhythm. You will notice more screens, shorter passes, even handing the ball off to settle him down.. I think the most inconsistent I've seen Cam is in the 3rd quarter... a lot of that COULD be after a few games, he knows if he doesn't put up 21 more points, the game is lost..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Finding out how many points we score in the third and fourth would go a long way to determining if it's the offense or defense that begins to crumble. If we still score decent points, but the D falls apart, we go in the red.

I think you'd probably find that the offense let off the gas in some games, and without the added pressure on the opposing offense benefitting our defense, they, well, showed their true colors.

Without the offense dictating the course of the game strategically, the D shatters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That can also be pointed out as good game planning from the coaches. They figure out how to attack other teams while hiding their weaknesses. If you go in to halftime with a lead and everything is going well there's no need to change things up. It's a double edged blade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://scottfowlerobs.blogspot.com/2012/01/on-cam-polian-and-nfl.html

So....generally the Panthers were toast after halftime. Seems other teams made adjustments and the Panthers did not?

Is this about having young players? New coaching staff?

Do you think this will be a worry in the future? It has haunted our past.

What I saw on Sunday was what I suspected when I read the postings on this site. I personally feel the problem as to why the Panthers were doing well in the first half and not as well in the second is because other teams made adjustments but it seemed the Panthers didn't.

When the opposing team, both offense and defense, implemented their adjustments, the Panthers didn't always have an answer and started pressing. When you press you make more mistakes. When you press, you get sloppy...When you press you get frustrated and give up. Evenmore is, when the offense pressed, the defense seem to relax.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hidden

http://scottfowlerobs.blogspot.com/2012/01/on-cam-polian-and-nfl.html

Do you think this will be a worry in the future? It has haunted our past.

this is just a personal opinion, so take it with a grain of salt..

however I believe the run 1st mentality is prone to a lack of adjustments.. in order to win games, you must continue to smash the ball between the tackles to wear out defenses..

I think we'll see more obvious adjustments with a pass first type philosophy.. You must hit different parts of the field, whether it be short to open up the deep pass, the outside routes toward the sideline in cover 2, so on and so forth.. different passes must be executed and you have several parts of the field to locate to keep the defense on their toes.. the run becomes more of an option instead of a requirement. an errant pass at best means a loss of down and at worst an INT, so the need to adjust becomes more important...

Just a theory I have.. you tend to see more old school coaches blamed for a lack of adjustments more so than you do pass first coaches because one is more obvious than the other to fans..

Link to comment

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...