Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Kingdoms of Amalur


Zaximus

Recommended Posts

Anyone play the demo? I recommend it to any RPG fans. It's a long demo actually. If you complete it (and at different intervals) you get Mass Effect 3 gear for that game and also gear from this game if you buy it.

The game isn't as dark as Skyrim, it has more colors. Probably not in-depth as much either, but the combat system blows Skyrim out of the water. It's more arcade-ish but it's super fun and looks great.

Apparently the studio (EA is publishing though) was founded by Curt Schilling (the baseball player).

I love how you can put points into magic and yet put points into hammers also and still get a special combo bonus for this. Lets you do whatever you want. It's easy in combat to swing a big hammer but also let loose spells and also block.

Anyway, give it a try. Not sure I'm going to get it release day because I have a lot of other stuff to play but I'm thinking about it (for the bonuses from amazon).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Schilling founded the company, Ken Rolston (lead designer of Elver Scrolls IV: Oblivion) is the Lead Designer, R.A. Salvatore wrote the story, and Todd McFarlane headed the art team. Talk about an all-star cast.

I've had my eye on this game for over a year now, when the team started talking about creating an MMO. Then, as a prequel to the MMO, and as a way to make sure the engine worked and was stable, they decided to create this game.

The demo is fantastic. I see it as everything Fable wanted to be, but never could accomplish. The combat system is awesome, very fun, and fluid. The colors are bright and whimsical, but the game isn't like that at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Picked it up today, played around a hour or two. So far it's fun. Haven't gotten into the story a bunch yet just been doing side quests.

You can defiantly see some older elder scroll influences. It has things like fighter guilds in a way, and the talent trees are nice to see again in more detail. Still not a whole bunch of adding attributes like adding points to strength or stamina like older rpg's.

The best way I can describe it is that it's what Fable should have been, but with a WoW art style that was made in today's time, with a little elder scrolls thrown in.

They already have like 2-3 dlc items out, which is good and bad. If you are able to have dlc for purchase on release day, why not put that in the game? It was obviously already completed before the game. But it's good cause it has potential for dlc in the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That can be a chicken or the egg scenario. Canales knows what the QB is good at and is not good at better than we do.  He would have reasons for not calling deep shots, if he is holding back. They could include protection concerns, as well as any Young related motivations.  I think there always the chance Bryce doesn’t see the man open down the field and it is just that simple, more than a confidence issue. Probably a mix of the two.   
    • This is a partially bad take.  Willis is the only guy mentioned here that can reasonably be expected to perform at a level higher than Bryce.  Winston and Minshew is washed, and Howell was not good in Washington as a starter and didn’t field a single snap this past year. I swear the only reason people are obsessed over him is that he went to UNC.  You’re not going to have better success, or even potential for success with those guys as your QB as you would with Bryce. Now, if you want to argue this thing from a production per dollars perspective, that it’d be better to roll with one of them instead because we could allocate the savings elsewhere on the roster, that’d be a better argument IMO. I’d disagree with it; relying on a QB making less they $5MM/year that isn’t on a rookie contract is not a winning strategy.  But I could see the argument that it’s possibly a viable alternative to Bryce on a $25MM/year contract.    But no, none of those QBs are better than Bryce. 
    • No team hits on every pick.  Every coach and GM will eventually get fired.   We are a better team and have greatly increased the talent on the roster. Bad GMs lead to losses.   I love the teams current setup in the front office and the process in how we look at talent and coaching.  Canales has often said we want to have a player developmental philosophy as a core tenant.  I love that combined with cutting edge analytics and good football knowledge and experience.
×
×
  • Create New...