Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers hire Richard Rodgers, Asst ST coach


Zithers

Recommended Posts

Sounds like Rivera is just trying to expand and build the coaching staff his own way. I think he just wants another person helping out with ST, which makes sense to me. I trust the guy - if he sees something in Dick Rodgers - then I have no problem.

Could this mean the Panthers will improve the special teams roster in the off season?

The ST roster WILL improve once we get our starters back from IR. Remember that we had to elevate ST guys to starting roles due to injuries. We had back-ups to back-ups playing on ST last season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i think you guys are over-analyzing this a bit too much.

rivera likes bringing his guys with him (chud, wilks, turner, etc) and since our ST was laughable last year (with injuries or not - baker and mare still had their worst seasons yet) it seems like murphy could use some help.

not that big of a deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i think you guys are over-analyzing this a bit too much.

rivera likes bringing his guys with him (chud, wilks, turner, etc) and since our ST was laughable last year (with injuries or not - baker and mare still had their worst seasons yet) it seems like murphy could use some help.

not that big of a deal.

except i can't figure out what in the world he brings. he has no significant or recent experience coaching special teams.

i just don't know what he brings to the table. it would be nice to know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The ST roster WILL improve once we get our starters back from IR. Remember that we had to elevate ST guys to starting roles due to injuries. We had back-ups to back-ups playing on ST last season.

That is a good point as well - but I was thinking more along the lines of what happens if injuries sap the ST again next year. If we're training rookies to be ST experts - might be good to have a guy that understands the rook mindset.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

except i can't figure out what in the world he brings. he has no significant or recent experience coaching special teams.

i just don't know what he brings to the table. it would be nice to know.

I think its a combination of giving a college teammate a foot-in-the door opportunity while getting some help for an area that sorely needs it. Never know what future implications this may have also. If Murphy does a poor job next year with a full complement of players (or so we hope) or leaves for greener pastures, we'll have his replacement on board. JMHO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think its a combination of giving a college teammate a foot-in-the door opportunity while getting some help for an area that sorely needs it. Never know what future implications this may have also. If Murphy does a poor job next year with a full complement of players (or so we hope) or leaves for greener pastures, we'll have his replacement on board. JMHO

1st thing I thought when I read the news... not every assistant to the assistant has to be a future hall of famer.. chances are Ron Rivera is hooking up an old friend who may have a little something to contribute..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure Murphy is on thin ice. Rivera got a little testy with Joe Person when he asked if Murphy was to blame because of poor ST play. He said "Don't ask that! Because I AM satisifed with his job performance."

rivera also made it sound like legatron was definitely going to be the starter for the entirety of the season barring him making some huge mistakes. rivera is a straight forward and informative coach, but hes not going to say "oh yes, i'm definitely looking to firing this guy".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He has 3 years of it at Port state, then while he was at Holy Cross he helped with the ST coach while running the defense. Exactly what he's doing here at Carolina, helping with ST. He brings more experience to staff on ST, Not only that but he was a ST player during his playing days. I'd figure he's probably going to a more on the field in your face guy, coaching up on technique and so forth for ST players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
    • Most elite WRs aren't necessarily burners. Not a lot of elite WRs in the modern era were 4.3 guys. If anything, sometimes it seems like the super fast guys use their speed as a crutch and it hampers their development in the intricacies of route running.
×
×
  • Create New...