Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL Draft worlds 3 round mock draft


99draft99

Recommended Posts

Hey guys check out NFL Draft Worlds 3 round mock draft http://nfl-draft-world.com/

Pick 9

Carolina Panthers

Offense Rank 7: Passing rank 13, Rushing rank 3

Defense Rank 27: Passing rank 24, Rushing rank 25

Team needs:

Cam Newton has taken the league by storm and has single handily brought the Panther back from the dead. Carolina has several pressing needs on defense and will need to give their dynamic QB some weapons at the wide receiver spot as Steve Smith had an amazing year last year but he is getting up there in age. Brandon LaFell is a decent started but is does not have the speed and size to be a future number one receiver.

Alshon Jeffery has all tools to become a dominant WR for years to come he has size to impose his will on CBs (6’4”, 229) and set his school record with 3,042 yards receiving over three seasons.

With the 9th pick the Carolina Panthers select:

Alshon Jeffery, WR, South Carolina

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would be shocked and appalled if the Panthers took Jeffery with the #8/9 pick.

I think Jeffery will rise back up the board between #12-20, that being said we have more pressing needs and better players will be available at 8/9. I'd be amazed if we select anything other than Claiborne if he falls by the grace of God, an offensive tackle, or arguably our biggest need, defensive linemen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No. Because we already took him at #8/9 :) But if for some reason we took someone else (Claiborne was available) then yes, I would. Might could get him for just next year's 2nd round pick (with this year's too). The Saints gave up a 1st and 2nd for Ingram, but they were picking low in the 2nd.

Claiborne and Brockers would be an insane draft for us, I wouldn't mind giving up next year's 2nd at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Plus, LaFell is 6'2" and 211 lbs with speed comparable to Jeffrey, if not a smidge better. I don't see how one is better suited to be a #1 than the other. Let's not even mention Gettis at 6'3" 216 lbs who's a speedster.

No, I wouldn't trade up for Brockers. Too much talent at CB on the board to chace a DT I'm not convinced we even need.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't see that happening, but I'm tired of trading up. Last three people we traded up for are Everette Brown, AE and Otah. By his own admission Hurney tried desperately to trade up for Clausen. Thank God that didn't happen or there likely wouldn't have been a pick for Cam.

If we do land Claiborne in the first there are still several good DT's that will be there at 40. But I don't see DT as a need and would much rather score an OLB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Plus, LaFell is 6'2" and 211 lbs with speed comparable to Jeffrey, if not a smidge better. I don't see how one is better suited to be a #1 than the other. Let's not even mention Gettis at 6'3" 216 lbs who's a speedster.

No, I wouldn't trade up for Brockers. Too much talent at CB on the board to chase a DT I'm not convinced we even need.

You watched the Carolina Panthers last year, right? ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You watched the Carolina Panthers last year, right? ;)

I also know we have 3 DT's coming off IR and picked up some others that showed some real potential at the end of the season. The revolving door at that position and at LB had a lot to do with our problems,

Rivera also said he liked our group of DT's, so I doubt the team sees it as much of a need either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I also know we have 3 DT's coming off IR and picked up some others that showed some real potential at the end of the season. The revolving door at that position and at LB had a lot to do with our problems,

Rivera also said he liked our group of DT's, so I doubt the team sees it as much of a need either.

One of those is an NFL journeyman and the other two had disappointing rookie seasons.

I hope Rivera is blowing smoke up everyone's ass or we're in trouble.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • These are the three deep throw attempts that Will Levis made in week 12. His first one is a beauty; Levis and Westbrook-Ikhine gets the safety to bite on a deep dig only to go over the top for the score. His second throw is another beauty: a crosser to Calvin Ridley reminiscent of Bryce to XL (though Ridley has noticeably more separation on his route). His third and final deep shot was an incompletion from his own endzone on 3rd & 14 with pressure coming down on him (to me, this seems like a solid throw).   Film Room Playlist NFL Pro-02.mp4 Film Room Playlist NFL Pro-01.mp4 Film Room Playlist NFL Pro.mp4 Film Room Playlist NFL Pro-01.mp4 Levis took half of the deep shots that Young did. The differences are: Ridley had much better separation than XL, which is why his deep crosser turned into a 63yd play since he was able to scamper for another 15+ after the catch. Westbrook-Ikhine holds on to his TD pass. Bryce had to throw one away to preserve time for a field goal. Bryce had two more throws that were incomplete due to the WR Are we really holding the three WR errors and clock management decision against Bryce in order to say that Will was better throwing deep in week 12? That's not passing the eye test nor is it confirmed by the data.
    • If you go on the PUP list before the season starts, you are gone for the year. If you start the year on the PUP list then you can get off of it. Kind of semantics, but we are putting him on the PUP list now which is before week 1, that’s why people who come off of it aren’t really on the PUP list until week 1, hence you usually hear right before the season that they are “starting the year” on the PUP list. I think PUP list and IR may basically be the serve the same purpose now because you also sometimes hear that if a player is added to the IR before week 1 that they aren’t eligible to come off the IR list for the entire year. Now, everyone added to IR (post week 1) can come off after 4 (or more) games so the PUP list is meaningless since it’s 6 games and starts at week 1. Anyone added to PUP or IR in the preseason is gone for the year.
    • I saw Brooks maybe a few weeks ago, he was walking pretty normally. of course he wasnt running, jumping and cutting.
×
×
  • Create New...