Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A case for getting another WR


MHS831

Recommended Posts

Sorry I could not come up with a new slant on the logo, uniforms, what Cam had for breakfast or what kind of dog he had as a kid. I have no insight into what the 50 yard line will look like or what was said on the Buccaneers' site.

This article is very interesting because these numbers state why we need to consider a quality WR in 2012. I know some of you say, "No, we don't need another wr--we need defense." I cannot argue with that brand of logic. Consider the fact that on each play on average, a WR sprints 10-20 yards per play; a game can have up to about 70 offensive plays. When the game is on the line and they are running pass routes on every play, they have essentially been sprinting (with a few breaks) for 3 hours. The best offense in the division, New Orleans, features 4 WRs, a pass catching RB, and a stud TE. All 3 of our WRs were on the field more than any Saint WRs. We lost games in the second half a bunch. Hmmm. Did they slow down as the game progressed?

Now, WHY was Steve Smith, at age 32, in the game on nearly 92% of the plays? Because he defense LOADED the box with safeties when he was out. They do not fear Lafell or Naanee. We need 2 WRs who threaten the defense. Is Gettis that WR? I do not think he is. Smith will be 33 next year. Gettis comes back on a surgically repaired knee, Naanee is a free agent, and Lafell was decent vs. #3 CBs.

Here is the article:

By Pat Yasinskas

His 2011 season wasn’t as spectacular as his 2010 rookie campaign, but Tampa Bay’s Mike Williams still was on the field more frequently than any other NFC South wide receiver.

Williams took part in 94.5 percent of Tampa Bay’s offensive snaps. He was on the field for 965 of Tampa Bay’s 1,021 offensive plays.

Carolina’s Steve Smith and Atlanta’s Roddy White each played more snaps, but came up short of the percentage of plays Williams was in for. Williams’ percentage of playing time ranked No. 4 in the NFL.

Smith ranked No. 7 in the NFL, taking part in 91.4 percent of Carolina’s snaps. He was on the field for 956 of Carolina’s 1,046 plays. White was involved in 90.5 percent of Atlanta’s offensive plays. He was on the field for 1,020 of Atlanta’s 1,227 offensive snaps.

Let’s take a look at other NFC South receivers and the playing time they got in 2011:

•Legedu Naanee, Panthers: 70.8 percent.

•Brandon LaFell, Panthers, 65.9 percent.

•Robert Meachem, Saints, 64.4 percent.

•Devery Henderson, Saints, 62.8 percent.

•Julio Jones, Falcons, 62.6 percent.

•Marques Colston, Saints, 57.2 percent.

•Harry Douglas, Falcons, 55.4 percent.

•Arrelious Benn, Buccaneers, 49.2 percent.

•Dezmon Briscoe, Buccaneers, 46.6 percent.

•Preston Parker, Buccaneers, 45.6 percent.

•Lance Moore, Saints, 36 percent.

•Eric Weems, Falcons, 24.1 percent.

•Sammie Stroughter, Buccaneers, 6.66 percent.

•Micheal Spurlock, Buccaneers, 4.7 percent.

•Seyi Ajirotutu, Panthers, 4.59 percent.

•Adrian Arrington, Saints, 4.51 percent.

•Kerry Meier, Falcons, 3.02 percent.

•Armanti Edwards, Panthers. 2.39 percent.

•Kealoha Pilares, Panthers, 2.01 percent

All 3 of our WRs are in the top 5 in the division.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry I could not come up with a new slant on the logo, uniforms, what Cam had for breakfast or what kind of dog he had as a kid. I have no insight into what the 50 yard line will look like or what was said on the Buccaneers' site.

however... let's start a new thread on why we should draft a WR in the 1st round... :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gettis will be fine with his knee. LaFell was pretty damn good against #2 CB's when he started and the TE's and RB's are big parts of our passing game.

Definitely not a big need, but you could justify it if the right guy is available.

I think it is big need though I wouldn't support it with the analytics above. I'd like to see some big time talent opposite Smith for once in 10 years, we've been in poverty at #2 WR for far too long. That said, great QBs can make great things happen with average guys (see Brees and his general assembly, Graham excepted) and perhaps we have that in Cam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know why everyone is so sure about how gettis will be as a WR. We've seen VERY little of him. Yes, he looked decent, but so did Keary Colbert that one year. Before we put him at #2 and say we're fine at WR, lets see how he performs in our new offense first in only his second year.

Exactly. It's very strange.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it's pretty simple.. I'm confused on why you all can't figure this out... we have a high octane offense thus far with a very pitiful defense, and yet you can't figure out why our 5th option shouldn't have an opportunity before we ignore our defense despite the positive contribution he has shown the year prior?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it's pretty simple.. I'm confused on why you all can't figure this out... we have a high octane offense thus far with a very pitiful defense, and yet you can't figure out why our 5th option shouldn't have an opportunity before we ignore our defense despite the positive contribution he has shown the year prior?

I don't think it is that simple bleys. I don't think NFL teams are that simple. And I'm not convinced one key move for the better on offense wouldn't improve our defense exponentially.

I agree, our defense is in obvious need, and I'm not even arguing we take a WR high unless he's...Blackmon, I guess, but I think a dominant WR would add every bit as much if not more to this team than a defensive player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

WR is a huge need more so due to Hurney's inability to get one with #1 potential.

Still it's after CB and DT and maybe even S.

Gettis showed some skill but people on this board take him way too seriously, he still has a lot to prove.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think it is that simple bleys. I don't think NFL teams are that simple. And I'm not convinced one key move for the better on offense wouldn't improve our defense exponentially.

I agree, our defense is in obvious need, and I'm not even arguing we take a WR high unless he's...Blackmon, I guess, but I think a dominant WR would add every bit as much if not more to this team than a defensive player.

so we agree then... and so it is that simple.

WR is a huge need more so due to Hurney's inability to get one with #1 potential.

Still it's after CB and DT and maybe even S.

Gettis showed some skill but people on this board take him way too seriously, he still has a lot to prove.

sounds like we agree... or that people take our defense to seriously...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...