Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

David DeCastro


Kuech the Sneak

Recommended Posts

so we cut the only proven and solid OG on the roster to spend a top 10 pick on someone to take his place...meanwhile we still hurt at RG and RT and DT and CB and OLB and FS.

sorry. bad idea.

ignoring a need because someone is listed as the overall BPA is a bit silly to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Decastro in my mind is unquestionably the best OL guy in this class. He's a phenomenal player.

Some people hate the idea of drafting a Guard in the first, but if you had a chance to have Steve Hutchinson on your roster or the next ten years, only a dummy would turn it down.

That said, I'd still rather address one of our more dire positions of need as long as the value is there. While Decastro would address a need, he'd be more of a BPA type guy than a need filler.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Decastro in my mind is unquestionably the best OL guy in this class. He's a phenomenal player.

Some people hate the idea of drafting a Guard in the first, but if you had a chance to have Steve Hutchinson on your roster or the next ten years, only a dummy would turn it down.

That said, I'd still rather address one of our more dire positions of need as long as the value is there. While Decastro would address a need, he'd be more of a BPA type guy than a need filler.

it depends on 1) what you had to bypass in the draft to grab that elite OG 2) what weaknesses would still be addressed that will have to make due with inferior choices 3) what options are available at OG that would still be an upgrade over what you have.

also, what guarantee is there that he would be a legendary OG/future HoFer, 10+ year player?

i might be a dummy, but just not 100% sold on doing that.

i agree about addressing the more dire areas of need, though, and hope that i stumble upon a later round/ edfa OT draft pick that can move inside and become our jahri evans or carl nicks. it's cheaper to go that route, imo. it might take a little longer, but it would be worth it. just rely on scouting and development. try to get an oline that can stay together for a few years and develop chemistry. that is the #1 thing that is needed on the oline, btw.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We give someone the Julio Jones hookup: get Jonathon Martin, David DeCastro in the 1st and Coby Fleener as a big FUG YOU to Luck
and we'd still lose games because the defense couldn't stop anyone.

at least we'd have the best Oline in the world or something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would like to see what Byron Bell could do at RG. (Assuming Otah came back healthy) Two run mauling machines on the right side, with our running game, would put a gigantic smile on my face. Ultimately, something will have to be done about Wharton's contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Bell's natural position is gaurd. (At least that is what he was listed under on the official page throughout the season) Remember, Wharton was a tackle coming in his rookie season, and was eventually moved to gaurd. I think Bell has more potential than Wharton.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • thats fair.   I was beginning to think rookie punter was in the plans 
    • Sam Martin   CARPunter#6 Panthers re-signed P Sam Martin to a two-year contract. NFL Network’s Ian Rapoport reports Martin’s deal is up to $5 million. Martin joined the Panthers last season on a one-year deal and wound up booting 56 punts for an average of 47.2 yards per punt. Martin is a 13-year vet of the league who has spent time with four different franchises. He landed a career-best 48.2 percent of his kicks inside his opponent’s 20-yard line last season.
    • Surprised CB is that low.  19th is odd spot. For many recent drafts, teams only felt there were around 14 first round players.  So to many 19 is just an early second and doesn't hold the value of a first.  If you go off- the smart path of LT, QB, edge, WR, CB, etc. Whatever your OG, Safety, ILB, etc needs to be a difference maker, that's the key point. I've said the 8th best edge is better than the 1st safety. Same for QB and even WRs. You should 100% factor in position value.  MHS you've been wanting a FS, let me tell you its super difficult to be a difference making FS. You're just sooo farrrr away from the action and the end result most times. If you're in the play, defense made mistakes in order. Now to talk out of both sides, maaaaaann that white boy from Oregon....I thought he crushed the combine and honestly that alone made me rethink "is he worth 19 now?!?!" he's now in the discussion for me, but still below others.    Plus I feel TE is vastly underrated in value terms. But looking at the last 20 years of TEs in the first, its down right bad. You're better like X10 better drafting one in 4th or 5th.  
×
×
  • Create New...