Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Feds Give Charlotte $70 Million for Light Rail


chknwing

Recommended Posts

I don't know why they don't do projects in upper Charlotte first before south Charlotte. Honestly how often do people get on the train from Pineville and ride to Charlotte, compared to the potential of university area, or he'll even if they made it how it was suppose to in the very beginning and go up to Davidson area. Much more customers that would pay compared to Pineville area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know why they don't do projects in upper Charlotte first before south Charlotte. Honestly how often do people get on the train from Pineville and ride to Charlotte, compared to the potential of university area, or he'll even if they made it how it was suppose to in the very beginning and go up to Davidson area. Much more customers that would pay compared to Pineville area.

They did the line south first because railway right of way already existed through southend and down to Pineville. Since they did not have to purchase much ROW or reconfigure streets (except at Scaleybark for a quarter mile), it was significantly cheaper to build.

The line to UNC Charlotte will run up the median of N. Tryon for most of the way, so they're going to have to do a ton of road work too to make the thing work.

The leg up to UNC Charlotte was originally slated to be completed in 2013, but now it won't start construction until then and won't be finished until 2016 or 2017.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know why they don't do projects in upper Charlotte first before south Charlotte. Honestly how often do people get on the train from Pineville and ride to Charlotte, compared to the potential of university area, or he'll even if they made it how it was suppose to in the very beginning and go up to Davidson area. Much more customers that would pay compared to Pineville area.

its not about making money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They did the line south first because railway right of way already existed through southend and down to Pineville. Since they did not have to purchase much ROW or reconfigure streets (except at Scaleybark for a quarter mile), it was significantly cheaper to build.

The line to UNC Charlotte will run up the median of N. Tryon for most of the way, so they're going to have to do a ton of road work too to make the thing work.

The leg up to UNC Charlotte was originally slated to be completed in 2013, but now it won't start construction until then and won't be finished until 2016 or 2017.

Sounds a lot like 485 and how it was suppose to be done now instead of being started, I bet we hear about how the south part of the rail needs repairs or something new before the north end even gets completed just like 485....

its not about making money.

even if it isn't the amount of traffic from north end that will be reduced and the amount of people that go uptown should be worth it.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The difference between the center city from 10 years ago to now is absolutely staggering and part of it is the rail system that alllows people to come in and work/play while not having to worry about parking fees or car security.

And yes I am all for the college line because as was said, there's too many college kids drinking and driving.

We will need more security perhaps but that will be offset by the increased revenue and expansion of business.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

id rather revitalize the independence corridor then waste money on north charlotte

Independence is too far gone for hope.

Mass transit should be built in areas where it is easily accessible to where people live. Running it down the middle of an expressway does not accomplish this.

I could get on board with running it down 7th and Monroe Rd, but Independence is a lost cause.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That is just Panthers history pain speaking.
    • From what I gather, sure it allows you more room in that you can manipulate the cap more due to smaller prorated amounts to fit salaries in, but for cap purposes, you're still on the hook for the money at the end of the day.    "ChatGPT You said: What are the advantages for NFL teams to sign larger signing bonuses? ChatGPT said: NFL teams often use large signing bonuses as a strategic tool in contracts. While they cost real cash up front, they offer several advantages, especially when it comes to salary cap management, player retention, and negotiation leverage. Here's a breakdown of the benefits: ✅ 1. Salary Cap Flexibility Signing bonuses are prorated over the life of the contract (up to 5 years) for salary cap purposes. This allows teams to spread out the cap hit, even if the player receives the money immediately. Example: A $20M signing bonus on a 4-year deal counts only $5M/year against the cap. ✅ 2. Attracting Top Talent Players love signing bonuses because they're guaranteed money paid up front. Offering a bigger signing bonus can sweeten the deal without inflating yearly salaries. ✅ 3. Front-Loading Real Cash, Not Cap Teams with strong cash flow can pay big bonuses now while minimizing the immediate cap hit. Useful for teams trying to build around rookie QB contracts or with flexible cash budgets. ✅ 4. Locking in Key Players Larger bonuses make it harder for a player to be released early due to dead cap consequences. This can create more job security for the player and roster continuity for the team. ✅ 5. Leverage in Restructures Big signing bonuses create future cap hits via proration. Teams can later restructure deals (e.g., convert salary to bonus) to create even more cap space. ✅ 6. Competitive Edge In free agency, a team offering more guaranteed cash up front often wins the bidding war, even if the total contract value is lower than another team's. ⚠️ Key Caveat: Large signing bonuses increase dead cap risk if the player is cut or traded early."   I think that roster bonuses can be a useful tool if you're trying to keep players in by manipulating numbers and spreading the hit over time, but I don't think that it's something that you want to use unless it's "necessary." I don't know that you want to get into signing rookies on roster bonuses, as the bust rate is relatively high.    
    • not even if that team in New Orleans disbands before the first game.  Saw one 2026 mock that had them drafting first next year.  
×
×
  • Create New...