Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

TWC experts?

Bronn

By Bronn,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

Bronn Contributor

Bronn

Posted
Posted

I know several of you have TWC for your viewing needs... and I know several of you hate them even if you don't have them now... Simply put, they are my only option at this point, save satellite services...

We're on one of the "locked in" rates until like September or so, and will have to call again to get a comparable rate once our current one expires...

On this program, I'm curious if we can add channel subscriptions without voiding our rate...

I could call them, and probably ultimately will, but was wondering if anyone here knew...

One would assume that we could just add the channel/package at our rate plus the additional charge... but I dunno if it works like that...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Kramerica Rookie

Kramerica

Posted
Posted

*sigh* our cable/internet bill is $130 a month..that's w/hbo and showtime..don't know if that's good or not

Not bad if you have high speed and DVR. My bill was at about 150 with digital cable, high speed internet, Showtime, and no DVR. I recently got into a promotion, though, that brought it down to 113 with the same package.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bronn Contributor

Bronn

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Currently we pay around $128 a month, and that is for digital cable, 2 DVRs, and Road Runner internet... Before we locked into that rate, it was $135, but I threatened to leave completely if they didn't at least knock a few dollars off...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Bear Hands
      Bryce's Achilles Heel Is Not What You Think It Is

      By Bear Hands · Posted

      Totally.  I'm less comparing them as players and using him as a reference point.  I legitimately think Bryce is capable of being a better NFL QB than Kyler has been.  Kyler has no clutch gene and doesn't seem to have a grip on the locker room, or much love for the game.  Much different body types/strengths and weaknesses.   Crazy to think-- but Kyler is at year 7 as a 1.01...38-48-1 on his career, 0-1 in the playoffs. He's somehow played well enough to keep it going but crazy to think he's barely even touched the playoffs.  Hasn't done anything that special for the Cards.  That's what you don't want to be stuck in.  Cardinals are in softball purgatory with him.    
    • kungfoodude
      Hey You, You Don't Know Quarterbacking

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      It's not analysis. There was no attempt to analyze anything or even convey new information at all.
    • Mr. Scot
      Hey You, You Don't Know Quarterbacking

      By Mr. Scot · Posted

      As to the topic, I've complained before about "superstar" mentality, i.e. the notion that you can win championships with one superstar player surrounded by a group of mediocre fill ins. It just doesn't work. The Manning-Brady rivalry was something of a showcase for that. The Colts general approach focused everything on Manning. The Patriots? Oh, they also had a superstar quarterback but they built a complete team, especially on the defensive side. This sort of thing is why I've argued many times that "system quarterback" should be to considered a description, not an insult. I know everybody loves the "MVP" athletic types, and they're fun to watch, but that's not necessarily the true path to consistent winning and championship glory.
×
×
  • Create New...