Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is it ok to ask an employer why you were not hired?


tarheelpride

Recommended Posts

not gonna argue about it...it just wouldn't be a question I would answer truthfully if I was doing the interview...it would be a cookie cutter...your resume seems fine and your interview went well...we have several other people to look at, have a nice day...don't call us, we'll call you!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been interviewing people for 15 years, and my one rule is if I interview you I'll call you back. Seems like common courtesy to me, interviewers who sit up in their ivory tower and never call back the applicants (who were interviewed) who didn't get the job are just plain rude. We're all human after all.

To the OP. Unless you have some major glaring flaw it's hard to give feedback like that, for all the well listed reasons above.

The only time I've given real, honest feedback is when I have people who have those major flaws that can't be considered discrimination, and those are very rare

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a good question. I have been thinking of doing the same thing. I have been unemployed for over a year now. I cant seem to get hired anywhere. I usually dont even get a response back when i apply. I have applied for hundreds of jobs over the last year and have maybe had 5 interviews. I just dont know what i am doing wrong.

You need to do more than just upload and submit your resume.

You should also tailor your resume to fit every job you apply for. A lot of companies, especially larger ones, will use resume screening software that will scan your resume for keywords related to the job description. If it doesn't meet the requirement, it disqualifies you before anyone ever looks at it. A very common thing to screen for is address. Some companies don't feel like dealing with employees that have to relocate, so they just set the screener to kick out of area resumes aside.

Surf LinkedIn for people at companies you'd like to work for and send them messages. Some companies have openings, but don't list jobs because the internet has made it so easy to apply that they end up with a lot of trash resumes from people that are completely unqualified.

There is nothing wrong with cold calling companies either, although most don't like it if you show up in person unannounced.

You have to make yourself stand out.

We got a great cover letter from a guy a few days ago that didn't meet our listed requirements, but his cover letter was well written, hilarious, and explained his situation, his skills, and his background. We interviewed him. Not sure he'll get the job, but he got himself noticed and got us to talk to him and that's the most important step.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

sounds like you are a bad employer

I agree with Hawk... (can't believe I typed that... :crazy:)

...but I would tell someone approximately the same thing. Unless they were an absolute shoo-in for the position, I'm not going to give them too much honest feedback at that point, esp if I had others to interview.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Z is a good employer. You should take notes Hawk.

edit: I do agree asking the question after the interview is pointless. Close the interview.

I have never interviewed someone without giving them a call back...and it's always me that calls them...not some flunky from HR or a secretary!

As for the how they did question...I don't think it's a good idea to give them false hopes. If I'm interviewing 10 people and you are number 1 - 9...I don't know how well you did compared to the others...I only know when #10 walks out the door. Like Biscuit said...if you really shined and I'm pretty confident that you are it, I might tell you more...but I'm not going to bullshit you before the process is complete.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ive just been through a 2 month long hiring search to fill a position. I was replacing a staff member who just wasn't working out so I had the luxury of time.

I interviewed about 30 people of the hundred plus resumes we got and in the end only a 2 or 3 of them didn't have the skills. Almost everyone I passed over was fine and probably could have handled the job but it was little things that tip the scales against them.

Some of the reasons I disqualified candidates:

A weak handshake.

Not knowing anything about who we are and what we do

Poorly fitting suit.

Smelled like an ashtray.

Couldn't name the last novel they had read.

Not a football fan.

Didn't play video games.

Those last three are big culture things among my team. Its what we talk about in our downtime.

Point being Id be wary of asking. Youll either get a lie, some canned response they tell everyone or something you really don't want to hear. Would you really want to know I disqualified you because you don't read novels?

my...god....and my whole childhood my parents told me I was wasting my time

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have never interviewed someone without giving them a call back...and it's always me that calls them...not some flunky from HR or a secretary!

As for the how they did question...I don't think it's a good idea to give them false hopes. If I'm interviewing 10 people and you are number 1 - 9...I don't know how well you did compared to the others...I only know when #10 walks out the door. Like Biscuit said...if you really shined and I'm pretty confident that you are it, I might tell you more...but I'm not going to bullshit you before the process is complete.

then thats what you tell them if they ask. most people appreciatte the honesty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

then thats what you tell them if they ask. most people appreciatte the honesty.

Yeah, most people appreciate the honesty, I do... and I try and be honest with people. Like Hawk said, I personally contact people that I've interviewed and tell them the results...

The problem is the 5% of people who are psychos and if you were 100% honest with them, they would end up suing you or something... :mad:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, most people appreciate the honesty, I do... and I try and be honest with people. Like Hawk said, I personally contact people that I've interviewed and tell them the results...

The problem is the 5% of people who are psychos and if you were 100% honest with them, they would end up suing you or something... :mad:

Exactly. pose this question to a company lawyer and their radar goes on full blast. We aren't even allowed to respond to reference calls other than "they worked here from such and such to such and such".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am trying to remember when I EVER said reach for need. My thing if someone falls you jump, if you can trade back a few slots and get help at the right value and pick up some ammo to move up from 51 which I think is outside the money zone, then you do that.   Take a WR later. Plenty of capable WRs have come from the 3rd round. Though this year I would go for C there if there was a reasonable choice. Take a TE if you must. I see more reason to take WR than TE. I think you give guys drafted two years ago and last year a chance to develop before cancelling them.    I think it is kind of unrealistic to throw everything all in on offense in hopes of going deep in the playoffs after an 8-10 year, even if it did have some nice bright spots in it.    And outside of this argument but relevant to it, I am bothered by Canales and Morgan and their apparent posture that we have arrived and are now in the big boy club. I don’t know where that comes from. They are out there talking like they are winners at 8-10. Backing into the playoffs in a real convoluted tie breaker scenario. They had some good games, yes. But the big feather n the cap, the LA Rams matchups, did you see what the Rams did? They didn’t fire the coaches but they fired their defensive backs. Bryce beat them yes, and it was pretty, but it was kind of like the Bucs and Mike Evans picking on our decimated secondary in 2022. Someone (Wilks) went down for allowing that to happen and they went down in LA too.  Wr aren’t as good as a whole lot of homers think we are. Shore up the trenches.    I think too many fans buy into it because they are so starved for anything that looks like a winner. 
    • How exactly does one win OROY "by default"? Wouldn't winning the award mean that of the two, McMillon stayed strong the entire year while the other guy didn't and fizzled out? That's like saying Secretariat only won by default because the other horse stopped moving midway through the race. Absolutely zero logic in that statement, which makes me very glad that I've never really paid much attention to Walterfoozball.
    • I agree, teams in the past have fired the HC in order to retain a coach on staff...hell it happened to Mcderp this year, rams in the past and Im missing another.  The fall off for the Panthers team defense was huge once Mcderp leftd and Ron could not fix it even when he named himself DC. 
×
×
  • Create New...