Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dre.


Guest Bwood

Recommended Posts

I've gone back almost two years, not coaches film, but watched him isolated, and I feel like he'll do a fine job with guys, especially most teams #2.

The reviews on him do say that he is much better in a zone coverage than man-to-man. He has great reaction skills and breaks on the ball quickly. He often woudl get beat off the line in press man....which is not uncommon for a DB as tall as he is. He does use his speed and length to recover, but is often in a recovery position.

Not saying that he can't succesfully play man coverage. Just that his skill set is better suited for a zone system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've gone back almost two years, not coaches film, but watched him isolated, and I feel like he'll do a fine job with guys, especially most teams #2.

I wouldn't expect you to have "Coaches Film." But it sounds like, to me, you went back and watched highlights on youtube. That's not the best way to judge players. I watch a handful of Bama games per season. He has the talent, measurables, and potential to work on it, but it's something that many people pick up on when they watch him.

I don't want to sound like I am bashing him, because I'm not, it's just a critique of his. If the coaches didn't feel comfortable with Janoris's past and didn't think he'd mature from it, then I would consider Dre. But I am not sure why people would want Dre over Janoris without his background.

The reviews on him do say that he is much better in a zone coverage than man-to-man. He has great reaction skills and breaks on the ball quickly. He often woudl get beat off the line in press man....which is not uncommon for a DB as tall as he is. He does use his speed and length to recover, but is often in a recovery position.

Not saying that he can't succesfully play man coverage. Just that his skill set is better suited for a zone system.

Yet another person has read something similar that I have seen/read.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would say someone that is 6'1 3/8, 186 lbs running a 4.45 40 prob has the skills to both cover a guy running down the field/across the field which I've seen him do well on film... and locate an area of the field and play defense in that area. He can do both, and to say he is better suited to one type or the other seems silly.
saying that he's can do both equally well is sillier.

oh, and just because a guy is big and can run fast doesn't mean he can cover squat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

saying that he's can do both equally well is sillier.

oh, and just because a guy is big and can run fast doesn't mean he can cover squat.

Hey Rayzor thanks for the imput. In watching his games, he has fluid hips can turn and run, and plays the ball well enough in the air. His 40 time shows me he runs a little faster in his under armour spandex than pads, but to say, like some are, that because he can read and react to plays in front of him and hes a big hitter that he can't play man coverage is moronic. If you cant cover a guy man to man, how did you make it to a D1 school, in the SEC, and top 15 draft pick? Because hes tall fast and black? give me a break bro, the dude can play both. Now STFU.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

More and more i am thinking we should look at Corner or Defensive end with our first pick. Say what you want but Dre looks the part. Corners are gonna go fast with folks taking chances on small school prospects and character issue guys like Janoris Jenkins. I am starting to think we need to find our top DE and CB and pick whichever is there. I am still proposing taking a chance on a DE or CB then letting the second truly be BPA at either DT or Safety.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't expect you to have "Coaches Film." But it sounds like, to me, you went back and watched highlights on youtube. That's not the best way to judge players. I watch a handful of Bama games per season. He has the talent, measurables, and potential to work on it, but it's something that many people pick up on when they watch him.

I don't want to sound like I am bashing him, because I'm not, it's just a critique of his. If the coaches didn't feel comfortable with Janoris's past and didn't think he'd mature from it, then I would consider Dre. But I am not sure why people would want Dre over Janoris without his background.

Yet another person has read something similar that I have seen/read.

No, highlights on youtube are highlights bro. I went to a friend who records bama games, and is a die hard fan, and watched a few of the games from each season he's played.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hes got to bring his hands more when he hits, but he looks fluid when he runs and can work on everything. No prospect is flawless, but to say he cannot do something is outlandish.

We aren't saying he can't do it (meaning man coverage), we are just saying it isn't one of his strong suits. It's something he'll have to work on. That's all we have ever been saying. He has more potential and upside than Claiborne and Jenkins but his production thus far as a cover corner has not been as high, for whatever reason.

And to think he has shown he can do both man and zone equally well is not accurate. He excels better in zone and I'm not sure why you haven't seen that.

Not opposed to selecting him, but I rate Mo and Janoris above him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hidden

No, highlights on youtube are highlights bro. I went to a friend who records bama games, and is a die hard fan, and watched a few of the games from each season he's played.

Not saying he can't....just that his physical attributes and strengths appear to translate better to a zone scheme than a man scheme.

Link to comment

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just because all draft picks are a gamble doesn't mean you don't have a better chance at hitting on a better player the higher you're drafting. It would literally be like someone saying, I'll give you 1 or 2 free spins on a slot machine, and you say you'll take the 1 because you're not likely to win anything anyways with 1 or 2, so why bother? The Cowboys desperately wanted T-Mac, but because they were 4 picks behind us, they weren't able to get him.  If you told Cowboys fans that had they lost 2 more games last year in a lost season, that it would get them the player they wanted so badly, would they in retrospect go back and lose those games to get their guy? 95% of them would take that trade off in a heartbeat, and the others who wouldn't are the fans who would rather enjoy an extra win or two in a poo season to then set themselves up to be better for the next decade. I also think the fans who argue against this thinking, get too caught up in the "well that means you're going to be rooting against us late in the season even if we still have a shot at the playoffs." Which isn't true, it's saying if you're telling me right now we'd make the playoffs but lose in the first round, that I'd rather end up 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss the playoffs because in our opinion, the benefits that come along with that outweigh the benefit of the players getting 1 game of playoff experience.
    • In relation to tanking. I think you can count on one hand the number of people here who actually want us to lose football games. When accounting for it across the fanbase it amounts to maybe 2% of the entire Panthers fanbase. But you engage with some internet trolls and think haters are coming out of the woodwork and hey look at that it's all a conspiracy that leads to Bryce Young haters. Do you hear yourself sir? If it sounds ridiculous that's because it is. I mean at this point do you see Bryce haters in your dreams? As far as the culture of this franchise goes we seem to be doing better in that department via what we are building right now and with the people we have in place. But we also shouldn't just make assumptions just yet either. The rubber still needs to meet the road. And going back to previous seasons I think we can acknowledge although tanking obviously isn't a thing there were some times where we thought our culture was improving but really it wasn't. Yes I'm looking directly at some of those wins under Wilks. If the culture had truly changed we would not have lost to the Steelers who have been mediocre for years at home the way we did and they were starting Mitch Trubisky ffs. We did not change our culture for the better and we won games that ultimately meant nothing. It was just a brief mirage. We've done this for years now. The harsh truth of the matter is the Panthers have not had a winning season or been to the playoffs in going on 8 years but in those years they've been trying to convince themselves they aren't poo but in the process all they've done throughout most of that time period is squander better draft position and we were still the worst team in the league for our troubles. At the end of the day we should be able to just be adults and reconcile with that. And no that isn't being "pro tank" or any other boogeyman term it's simply recognizing reality.
    • He's an asset in a game manager role. But as soon as you have to ask him to go out there and try to make plays and not just take what the defense is giving him... well, Darnolding happens.
×
×
  • Create New...