Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Peyton Done in Indy


Recommended Posts

I think he meant an "official" OC, but yeah, I agree. He's ran the offense in Indy for years.

I could see him as a GM more than coach. I've always thought Manning would transition to front office, maybe even ownership once his playing years are done.

Can't wait to see where he ends up. Hope it's somewhere with playoff chances and he's in top form. Would be great for NFL fans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Something that no on here has thought about. Well Except me!

IF Peyton fails a physical with another team, there a real BIG chance that the Colts will bring him back as the QB coach!

The Colts let their QB coach go, and as far as I know, they have yet to name anyone. Peyton may get his chance to work with Luck!

Imagine the conversation...

"Look Peyton, we may have thrown you to the roadside but no hard feelings, right? Okay so we have this coaching position open, and we think you're a perfect fit. The pay is $530,000, so it's a little less than the $23,000,000 we paid you last year, but it sure would be swell to have you join our new staff".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still think it was a bad move by the Colts.

Under the new rules, number 1 picks only make about 5 million dollars a year.

They could have let Luck sit behind Manning for a year or two in order to learn from arguably the best QB ever to play the game. 5 million dollars isnt a lot of money when working around a salary cap.

Give Luck a year or two of tutelage like the Packers did with Aaron Rodgers, and then trade Peyton for 2 1st round picks.

IMO, this situation was completely mismanaged. Speculation on my part says that it is probably why Polian was fired, because he thought it was a rediculous idea to begin with.

Why did they let one of the best QBs in history walk without any compensation? It boggles me.

This all flies out the window if Peyton's injury is carrer-ending, but if Manning can still play, it was a poor decision.

You can't be serious. Are you forgetting the bonus due? Who the hell is going to risk 28 million dollars(plus salary) on a 35 year old QB with his type of injury/surgery? Nobody. QB coaches come a lot cheaper than Peyton Manning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still think it was a bad move by the Colts.

Under the new rules, number 1 picks only make about 5 million dollars a year.

They could have let Luck sit behind Manning for a year or two in order to learn from arguably the best QB ever to play the game.

No way could the most pro-ready, heady, and intelligent QB coming out of college in the centuries of the sport be expected to sit and learn.

;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I REEEEEEEEEEEEAAAALLLY hope Luck sucks. After all the hype, him basically insulting our organization (it's cool, we have OUR QB), and the Colts releasing possibly the greatest QB of all-time for this horseface mf'er, I really hope he sucks.

I also hope Peyton goes to Miami... I'd like to pull for them coming out of the AFC and if we can't win it next year, I'd love to see the Dolphins do it because Marino never did for their fans. Just seems like it would be a cool fit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Miami...but I obviously hope Seattle!

I'm biased as poo of course, but I think Seattle has all the pieces other than a QB. Our defense has come miles over the last season, if Rice is healthy and Mike Williams plays like he did in 2010, we have two great tight ends and one hell of a RB. Our O-Line is extremely young, but they came a long way last year and made a shitty and unhealthy Jackson look not too bad at times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I thought he had a few really nice flashes.  I can see him showing out this year 
    • I have heard that before--when standing in front of a full body mirror at Old Navy.  I said it, actually. Seriously, Let's go on what we know. There is reason for optimism that exceeds random opinions and negativity: 1. Last year, the offense was the priority and the interior offensive line was the focal point. Morgan addressed it in free agency and the draft. They improved.  2.  Last year, Canales pulled Young after 2 games and replaced him with an established veteran.  Instead of giving up on Young, he developed him, primarily focusing on his footwork and timing.  Continued development in his fundamentals should result in improved play.  (this is significant because some athletes rely on natural ability and do not adapt well.  They resort to old habits. This means that Bryce is "teachable" and is willing to face adversity and fight through it.  That is what you want in a QB.) 3. Morgan drafted a raw talent at WR; and we all knew he was raw.  Huddlers are already calling it a bust, but his productivity numbers were in line with the other WRs drafted around where he was drafted.  So, yes, he was a bit disappointing, but what part of "Raw" is not understood here?  Evil Bryce, then inconsistent Dalton, then good Bryce--all while facing the top defensive backs--and let's not forget about his lingering injuries--and we should understand XL's productivity.  Morgan was looking for a home run based on XL's 1-season productivity and his freakish athleticism, but I always thought we would not know what we have until year 2.  TMac alone will make XL better--a solid #2. 4.  If you blame Morgan for drafting XL, you must give him credit for making Coker a priority free agent.  In my view, he addressed WR in 2024 pretty effectively in the long view.  5.  Let's look at the rest of the draft.  Brooks?  The best RB in the draft in round 2?  Morgan was attempting to build a solid run game behind Bryce.  Wallace was a very solid third round pick at LB. Sanders is a strong TE for a fourth round pick. 6.  Not much is being said about the development of Chau Smith-Wade.  His improvement mirrors Bryce Young's, actually.  In his first 8 games, his PFF rating was 36.5.  In the final 9 games, his PFF rating was 66.7.   7.  With so many needs, Morgan hit the UDFA market with success. In addition to Coker, Demani Richardson got 400+ snaps and had a 60.1 PFF grade, including an interception. 8.  In free agency, Morgan spent big bucks on Guards, a move that made his QB better. He added David Moore, Nijman,  He signed Clowney, Wonnum, Robinson, Jewel, Chaisson, Fuller, Scott, D. Jackson, Dionte Johnson, etc.  A few years of Fitterer left him with more holes that players.  Some did not work out, but he did all this on a budget (after he splurged on Lewis and Hunt).  It is hard to get a free agent to come to a team that loses--so in some cases, Morgan had to overpay or accept questionable players. Morgan's first year as a GM demonstrated an understanding of the game like we have not seen since Polian, before his lost it. Canales, on the other hand, should be rated by the improvement of players.  Zavala, Ekwonu, Mays, Young, Smith-Wade, Coker, Wallace--all improved.  He had to overcome major losses such as D. Brown, Shaq, Dionte Johnson, Corbett--and we saw growth.  Despite all this team went through, after 8 games of disarray, This team finished 4-5 with close losses to both Super Bowl teams.  Frankly, I do not know how he did it. This year was better.  The WR room is solid with depth.  The OL room is solid with depth.  The TE room is as good as it has been in a while.  The RB room has the potential to be as good as it was when we had 28 and 34.  DBs?  Better.  DL?  Better.  Edge?  better.  The bottom of the roster?  Much better. We really don't know what we have yet, and that makes this offseason exciting.      
    • Here you go. 2 yards. Bryce Sneak.mp4
×
×
  • Create New...