Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

SI re-does the first round of the draft


Black

Recommended Posts

slayton over stewart? and as mentioned jackson over royal? and ellis and dorsey are waaaaaay to low. bad situation for dorsey in kc, no help, worse than pep has had at any time. would love him here even over otah with pep to play beside. he is just to much of a force until doubled and tripled. it make teams pick stop dorsey or pep. and DT is by far our weakest link. if he rights off long with subpar numbers same should be said for dorsey.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's an idiotic concept to do something like this. The reason rookies play well is the team around them. Put them somewhere else and it's a completely different situation.

Would Johnson or Stewart be as effective as the sole RB? Would Forte be as productive sharing the backfield?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hidden

It's an idiotic concept to do something like this. The reason rookies play well is the team around them. Put them somewhere else and it's a completely different situation.

Would Johnson or Stewart be as effective as the sole RB? Would Forte be as productive sharing the backfield?

Link to comment

i don't know. a lot of those things would have made sense.

ryan would have been a great option for miami and would have done more good there than penny. i would preferred him be somewhere than atlanta, thats for sure.

don't know if bulger is the problem in st. louis but he might be.

chris johnson in oakland.....i don't know if he would have been as productive but he was a better selection than 'double turf toe' mcfadden

forte and bush (while healthy) would have been huge for the saints

bengals would have won more than 2 if they had a running gam. slaton would have been good.

mcfadden in chicago....just doesn't make sense.

seahawks with jordy nelson makes sense. hass would have had at least someone to throw to and wouldn't have had to trade for colbert

it was interesting to look at anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • when we drafted Bryce Young that team might have been more talented than the team we currently have ?  that was the whole reasoning behind morgagting  our immediate future to trade up to #1 overall for BY. our front offices & owners felt like hey guess what the time is now to srike while the iron is hot go hire an All Star coaching staff we were only a Qb away from taking that next step ..just saying   
    • I just dont get the worry over losing a practice squad player that just went undrafted. Everyone just made their selections. The chances of a team wanting to sign him to an active roster after not selecting him is very low.  If that interested they would have taken him late to evaluate in person. As far as I can tell two qbs were signed off another teams practice squad last season and they were both going in to their 5th season.
    • I enjoyed reading this thread and the usual banter that follows. The only silver lining I can identify right now is we do actually have a couple of young QB's behind him and we do have a nice roster on both sides of the ball built around the most important position. So if the team overall shows some promise but we still falter largely due to a lack of consistent passing output (again) hopefully the decision makers can be free to make the best decision for the team going forward after the conclusion of this upcoming season.
×
×
  • Create New...