Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

SI re-does the first round of the draft


Black

Recommended Posts

slayton over stewart? and as mentioned jackson over royal? and ellis and dorsey are waaaaaay to low. bad situation for dorsey in kc, no help, worse than pep has had at any time. would love him here even over otah with pep to play beside. he is just to much of a force until doubled and tripled. it make teams pick stop dorsey or pep. and DT is by far our weakest link. if he rights off long with subpar numbers same should be said for dorsey.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's an idiotic concept to do something like this. The reason rookies play well is the team around them. Put them somewhere else and it's a completely different situation.

Would Johnson or Stewart be as effective as the sole RB? Would Forte be as productive sharing the backfield?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hidden

It's an idiotic concept to do something like this. The reason rookies play well is the team around them. Put them somewhere else and it's a completely different situation.

Would Johnson or Stewart be as effective as the sole RB? Would Forte be as productive sharing the backfield?

Link to comment

i don't know. a lot of those things would have made sense.

ryan would have been a great option for miami and would have done more good there than penny. i would preferred him be somewhere than atlanta, thats for sure.

don't know if bulger is the problem in st. louis but he might be.

chris johnson in oakland.....i don't know if he would have been as productive but he was a better selection than 'double turf toe' mcfadden

forte and bush (while healthy) would have been huge for the saints

bengals would have won more than 2 if they had a running gam. slaton would have been good.

mcfadden in chicago....just doesn't make sense.

seahawks with jordy nelson makes sense. hass would have had at least someone to throw to and wouldn't have had to trade for colbert

it was interesting to look at anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah they were bad QBs - but QB's that stayed on their teams for several years.  BY is better than all of those. 
    • This is the right move even if you think Bryce isn't the future. Everything except signing him to a long term deal until proven otherwise. There's a decent chance we have a shot to draft a QB next year that we like. 
    • If we're still bad enough that Canales gets fired, especially if it's during the season, there is no way we could ever attract any HC worthy of the job if we told them they had to keep Bryce their first year. That would be 2 coaches he's gotten fired and 4 years of not performing up to par. I still say replace both of them next offseason.  I like Canales the man and I think he's done an absolutely outstanding job at fixing our locker room issues, as it was really bad before he showed up.  But I just don't see it from him with his in game decision making, I think he's held us back just as much as Bryce has, just in different ways. Canales was our Dan Campbell, the coach you hire to turn the franchises culture around for the HC after them to inherit and take to the next level.   The difference was he had some elite coordinators early on and really let him focus on his "leader of men" role as opposed to the X's and O's that Canales does himself and it's turned out well for him.
×
×
  • Create New...