Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Warren Sapp Should Be Fired For His 'snitch' Comments


Dpantherman

Recommended Posts

From John Talty of the International Business Times:

...Sapp wasn't willing to back down, though. He took to the NFL Network airwaves, a network owned by the league, to say he was positive that Shockey was the one that initially told the NFL about the bounty system.

"My source that was close to the situation informed me that Jeremy Shockey is the one that was the snitch initially," he said. "I trust my source unequivocally." There are a lot of things wrong with Sapp's comments and should be severely punished, if not fired, for airing them on the NFL-owned television network.

What matters is that someone had the gumption to realize that a bounty system wasn't right and that the league needed to intervene. But who is going to want to come forward when the next scandal develops if a NFL employee is going to publicly shame them as a "snitch."

It's disgusting behavior for the league to allow, especially for an on-air personality. Sapp was undoubtedly hired for his outlandish personality and not his journalistic chops, but it's still embarrassing for any so-called journalist to bash a source as a snitch.

That's not to say that Bountygate is quite at that level of importance, but it still never would have been discovered had someone not gone to the league about it. Sapp, as a former NFL player, should be praising whoever went forward and not attacking him with some pseudo macho jock anger.

I love Sapp as an analyst, but I do think he's crossed the line. At the very least, he should be suspended as not only did he make a slanderous accusation with zero evidence, he did on the NFL Network, which is owned by the league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

blaming your source for bad information is such a NJpanther thing to do. We don't forgive NJ for being a dumbass, the NFL shouldn't forgive Warren Sapp. That is, if the NFL actually sees something wrong here in the first place.

I think a firing may be harsh. I think they need to sit down with him and remind him that he's not an analyst, he's an official NFL analyst and employee, and that his words carry more weight because of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I actually like Sapp as an on air personality...this crossed a weird line I can see termination being an option.

This.

I've always like his boisterous, almost stupid personality on the network, especially on Sunday mornings to complement the always pissed off and dour Faulk.

He pretty much went to the air and slandered a current player in relation to a very important event going on with the NFL.

Maybe suspended, but I doubt he gets fired.

Honestly would rather see him stay too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I actually think that......

......actually I don't care at all

you thought enough to post

is it really much different than guys like schefter, mortenson, etc who throw vague sh*t against the wall and see if it sticks as 'insider info'?

good point, drawing a line with reporting and slander though

So is Sapp a snitch now?

another good point...if you asked for his definition of a 'snitch' , probably yes.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ok fair to judge only his starts.  But you do acknowledge that going from "he's waaaay above league average in a number of categories" to "here's a single stat where he's above league average (not "waaaay") and another where he is exactly at the league average" is a pretty significant backpedal, no?  I'm guessing he's probably in the ~10th range for completion percentage too if we're only looking at starts (I'm too lazy to isolate his starts and do the calculations), so I'll grant you that one too.  But I don't think completion percentage is all that meaningful as a standalone stat if it isn't bolstered by good TD%, Y/A, etc. On that note, for how much people like posting Passing Charts in here (*cough* CRA) - if you peep Shough's passing charts, he hasn't completed a single 20+ yard pass in the past 3 games combined.  His last one was in Week 13 against the Dolphins, which was a single pass of 24 yards.  I just want to be consistent in how we apply our standards - I think it's always been warranted to criticize Bryce for it (even dating back to his rookie season), but do we suddenly not care about that with Shough? And yeah I did acknowledge that Saints' fans have reason to be excited about him and complimented his poise, which is giving my props.  Still not sure I agree that he looks better than a "ton" of QBs nor do I think you or anyone have really demonstrated that.  I think you are generally one of the more reasonable level-headed posters which is why I'm confused at what I consider to be rather hyperbolic language about Shough.
    • I don't disagree with you, but want to point out that Tremble's strong suit has always been blocking. Case and point: on Horn's 25 yard run, he lays down not 1 but 2 nice blocks...and is looking for #3! https://www.panthers.com/video/jimmy-horn-jr-s-25-yard-run-gives-panthers-red-zone-access-on-first-drive
    • It is a popularity contest.  The selection does have meaning though. It is also 1 of the criteria that is considered for the HOF. The game does not have any significance. The team hasn't been to the playoffs in nearly a decade. That's why they don't get primetime national coverage. To the victors go the spoils.
×
×
  • Create New...