Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

We Should Hope Bill Parcells Coaches The Saints


fieryprophet

Recommended Posts

Let me explain in no uncertain terms why this would be a GREAT thing for us:

Bill Parcells is first and foremost a defensive-minded coach. The Saints do not have a defensive-minded roster, and Spagunola would find it very difficult to retain his players ear when competing with the potentially Hall of Fame bound Parcells, leading to friction on that side of the ball.

This also becomes an issue when it comes to the offensive system, because at best Parcells will stay completely away from that side of the ball and leave the workload to Carmichael, and at worst (and much more probably given Parcells past forays into meddling on his own teams) Parcells will prefer to instill more of a ball-control offense that is extremely dissimilar from the current Saints schemes. I cannot imagine Bill agreeing to having Brees throwing 50+ times a game when he benched Phil Simms for almost an entire season in favor of a journeyman QB who would follow his marching orders better.

There's also the factor that worked against Joe Gibbs when he returned to the NFL: time away from the game leaves anyone, even the best of coaches, unprepared for just how much the game has transitioned in even the last few years. The team will reflect his philosophies, and they are still set in the 80s and 90s.

The last thing the Saints need is any interruption from the continuity and schemes that they are familiar with: they are a veteran team, and those veterans are already set in their ways and will look at anyone changing what they're comfortable with as undermining the leadership they have to project in the place of Payton. Parcells may be a sexy hire for the media, but he will be an extremely poor fit and will very likely destabilize the Saints even worse than if they promoted from within.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

honestly i think with Brees being so heavily involved they'll be fine on offense with Carmichael.

but their offense was never the problem. their defense was already pretty bad, they don't have any early draft picks and free agency wise they've lost more talent on D then they've added. and they're going to have several defensive players facing suspensions on top of having a new defensive coaching staff and scheme.

top 5 offense, bottom of the barrel defense. i'd say 8-8 at best

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the loomis suspension was retarded. a GM does next to nothing during the season except maybe scout for the next years draft (which he can still do at home) or work out extensions for players that will be free agents next year (which he will still have plenty of time to do once he comes back)

all the important time of free agency and the draft he'll still be around for, that suspension means almost nothing for their org

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing. Joe Gibbs coached 4 seasons in his return to the sidelines and had his team in the playoffs two of those 4 seasons. That is something the Redskins did only once before he stepped down to begin with and hasn't happened since so give the old guy some credit.

I think its a good move by the Saints. It lets the coordinators do their jobs without dealing with the everyday BS of being the headcoach. Its going to be a zoo to begin with and Parcells is use to dealing with the media and the spotlight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

honestly i think with Brees being so heavily involved they'll be fine on offense with Carmichael.

but their offense was never the problem. their defense was already pretty bad, they don't have any early draft picks and free agency wise they've lost more talent on D then they've added. and they're going to have several defensive players facing suspensions on top of having a new defensive coaching staff and scheme.

top 5 offense, bottom of the barrel defense. i'd say 8-8 at best

8-8? I think that's alittle wishful thinking. Didn't they set the record for most offense ever last season and won like 13 games? The offense looks as good as ever and Lofton IMO is an upgrade over Vilma at this point in his career.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing. Joe Gibbs coached 4 seasons in his return to the sidelines and had his team in the playoffs two of those 4 seasons. That is something the Redskins did only once before he stepped down to begin with and hasn't happened since so give the old guy some credit.

I think its a good move by the Saints. It lets the coordinators do their jobs without dealing with the everyday BS of being the headcoach. Its going to be a zoo to begin with and Parcells is use to dealing with the media and the spotlight.

Gibbs had four years. Parcells would presumably get one in very different circumstances. And if you imagine the Tuna would actually take on the head coaching role without tampering with their schemes you're deluded.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8-8? I think that's alittle wishful thinking. Didn't they set the record for most offense ever last season and won like 13 games? The offense looks as good as ever and Lofton IMO is an upgrade over Vilma at this point in his career.

brees almost broke the passing record in 2008 and they still went 8-8 with an easy ass schedule. their offense should drop off slightly from losing meachem, no payton, going from nicks to grubbs but not by much.

mainly i just see their defense as being BAD. like close to last in the league type bad. lofton yeah thats fine and all, they still lost numerous free agents on D and have several more guys facing suspensions

lack of overall talent + losing some of their few good players + new scheme + no draft picks + suspensions = that D is gonna SUCK

Link to comment
Share on other sites

brees almost broke the passing record in 2008 and they still went 8-8 with an easy ass schedule. their offense should drop off slightly from losing meachem, no payton, going from nicks to grubbs but not by much.

mainly i just see their defense as being BAD. like close to last in the league type bad. lofton yeah thats fine and all, they still lost numerous free agents on D and have several more guys facing suspensions

lack of overall talent + losing some of their few good players + new scheme + no draft picks + suspensions = that D is gonna SUCK

Lets just agree the offense will be near the top. How many defensive players you thing will get suspended? Adding Bunkley and Lofton are solid upgrades IMO. They lost Porter but he couldn't stay healthy to save his life. To me they are moving out the players they know will have a long suspension and adding quality replacements. As long as the O can score in the 30's the Saints will be just fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gibbs had four years. Parcells would presumably get one in very different circumstances. And if you imagine the Tuna would actually take on the head coaching role without tampering with their schemes you're deluded.

Well the thing is this kind of punishment has never happened before. Parcells will know his role because he knows he has no future with this team. Hell i doubt he takes the job anyways.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
×
×
  • Create New...