Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

M. Lombardi: Bill Walsh's Nfl Draft Philosophies


Man Strength

Recommended Posts

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/09000d5d82857c66/article/bill-walshs-nfl-draft-philosophies-six-lessons-from-the-master

Michael Lombardi is always insightful, and these points all made sense to me.

most interesting and relevent I thought was this:

4) Watch out for players from downtrodden programs -- particularly programs that have just fired a coach -- being unfairly downgraded.

In Walsh's mind, players from a program that has just fired its coach pay a price in draft evaluation. Coaches rarely admit the real reason for their termination -- bad coaching -- instead placing the blame on bad players. These side effects of a losing culture can taint a scout's visit to a particular school. Walsh insisted that all the college prospects in this situation had to be examined closely.

could Coples be getting hit by this phenomenon right now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why is it that fired coaches can place the blame on players, but if players say the coaches are bad it's a red flag.

idk good point. . . "kids" vs "adults" maybe?. . .lower expectations of the coach due to it being a lot to handle and he's dealing with several players?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

idk good point. . . "kids" vs "adults" maybe?. . .lower expectations of the coach due to it being a lot to handle and he's dealing with several players?

You'd think it'd be the opposite though. Like bad kids are assumed to have bad parents, but it's taboo to think bad players could have had poo coaches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You'd think it'd be the opposite though. Like bad kids are assumed to have bad parents, but it's taboo to think bad players could have had poo coaches.

I guess what we're overlooking here is the source of the motivation which is the all mighty dollar. Supply and demand should dictate that there is a limited number of "good" coaches around. That should mean that they get more slack.

Also, where a player has a short lifespan for a school's program, the coach also will be around longer . . mm kind of feel like Im reaching on that 1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If by limited you mean rookies playing in a new system with no offseason, then yeah their limited. I'm willing to give them at another year before I call them limited.

cam had an even bigger hill to climb than they did

fortunately for him he had the skills to overcome all of those things and perform admirably

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • 6 pages of tuka and Seltzer arguing is actually 97 pages long
    • 100%. And these same people will claim you have an agenda. You can't have it every way. We had the lowest rated defense in the league last year. Statistically the worst ever. By PFF grades (for whatever that's worth- but they are readily accepted, used, and conveyed by most "reputable" sources), the defense was the worst ever. Not only that, PFF rated our receiving corp the worst in football last season. The absolute worst... out of 32 teams. Which is why regardless of the lip service Canales and Morgan paid to the current guys, they knew it would be criminal not to give Bryce more help. People fixating on team stats and not taking these things into context are stupid, plain and simple, and I'm for one thankful they're not running this team (or probably anything for that matter bc they obviously can't discern reality. Again, going back to the eyeball test these Narrative Nancies seem to hate so much, did they not see the windows Bryce was putting balls into? Have the generally not watched much NFL? Please, please show me the film where all these NFL QBs are making throws like this to this point Bryce was "below average" down the stretch compared to them. Bryce made more wow throws in that 3 game stretch of the Bucs, Chiefs, and Eagles than every other QB combined in all the years since since Cam got hurt I genuinely am baffled by people that can watch throws like that and act like it's nothing. I guarantee you Steve Spagnola, Todd Bowles, and and Vic Fangio didn't think it was nothing after watching the little guy torch them with players those teams would be embarrassed to trot out at the skill position players. The national media spent all year making excuses for Mahomes not having elite weapons when he had multiple 1st & 2nd round talents at the skill positions along with future HoFers in Kelce and Hopkins. Bryce wasn't throwing for 300 yards every week with David Moore and Adam Theilen in spite of jaw dropping throws and you want to say the guy played below average. For those people, again, we ain't watching the same sport. And the name calling doesn't change that... The vitriol and projection... it's off the effing charts with these people.  
    • "Well you see if you remove this terrible game that terrible game this other terrible game and then focus on these games you'll see he's actually one of the better QB's in the league and he's actually as good as Jayden Daniels". My god this place is delusional. I love it.
×
×
  • Create New...