Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Possible Trade Senarios


sml1950

Recommended Posts

Chances are there will only be a couple of trades in round one none of which will involve the Panthers. However, there seems to be such a wide divergence of analysis on almost everyone past the top six, there could be some real surprises early on. Depending on who falls and a teams circumstances, the ninth pick could end up having good trade value. Below is a rough estimate of what we could expect to get based on the standard trade value chart (http://profootballhuddle.com/archives/category/draft-value-chart):

#9- 1350 points

1. At 13 we could get a 4th, which we could package with our 4th for a 3rd

2. At 18 we could get an extra 2nd

3. If Cleveland wanted to get a second top 10 pick, we could get the 22 and 36 (1320 points)

4. We could then package the 36 and our 40 (1040) and get back up to 15 (1050). So for the 9 and 40, we get the 15 and 22.

5. Our 9 for NE 27 and 31(1280).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trade value is always an approximation depending on each party desire. It worked basically the same last year as in other years. The rookie wage scale makes it easier to trade a top ten pick but the chart is still a rule of thumb that teams use.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...