Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Some Don't Want Cam Scoring On The Ground ?


CRA

Recommended Posts

By him continuing to run he opens up opportunites for the RB's and the passing game in the RZ because the D will key on Cam. Take that away and our offense changes...dramitically.

Also between the 20's Cam is great about picking up chunks of yardage on the ground then diving before contact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

By him continuing to run he opens up opportunites for the RB's and the passing game in the RZ because the D will key on Cam. Take that away and our offense changes...dramitically.

Also between the 20's Cam is great about picking up chunks of yardage on the ground then diving before contact.

I am talking about the goal line runs rather than the other runs.

I would rather see the rb's get the majoritlty if the goal line hits.

I like seeing him take off when the pocket starts to break down and even on the read options

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reading comprehension? I said at least 12 games. 1 of those 7 was 12 games starting in 1987. Did you know that was a strike year? So yes that's a full season.

I wasn't quoting what you said, obviously. I was stating the facts about how many seasons he had full seasons. You are right about the '87 season, I forgot about the strike.

His supporting cast in 98 has nothing to do with making all-pro. To make that you have to be excellent despite who is around the QB.

Wrong. Every year the # of all-pros are higher form the top teams, therefore supporting cast does have something to do with it; suprising you think otherwise.

Cam is in a better situation because he doesn't have another QB taking away 2 whole seasons out of his career. Cam was ready right from the start. And he most likely will not retire and then come back to teams who already have a starter.

Back then & up until about last year (some now still), the consesus was that rookies who sat for a year or more would be more successful. Your contention does not support your theory; to be accurate, proper historical context is important.

Cunningham collectively had a decade worth of greatness. Cam is bigger and therefore more durable. We should at least get 10 years out of him.

He had 7 'good' years with maybe 2 'great' years. A career 56.6% completion rate; 81.5% career QB rating; 207-134 TD-INT ratio; average of 2700 yards passing per year ...not 'greatness' in my opinion. Cam's first year: 60% completion percentage (59.96%), 4,051 yds passing, 21-17 TD-INT ratio, 84.5% QB rating.

Also keep in mind there are other great runners and passers that lasted a long time as well. Warren Moon and Steve McNair. McNair had 6 straight seasons of at least 400 yards rushing and he lasted a long time. Cam's running ability may stay the same for about 5-8 years before he becomes more of a pocket passer like Moon. But Moon still had the threat of taking off when nothing was there, like McNair later in his career.

Moon makes sense, McNair was seriously beat up & injured, not a good example. McNair his last couple of years could not take off & run...he last his running ability b/c his ribs were broken,etc.

That's what Cam will become later in his career. A pocket passer that still has the threat of taking off every now and then. We should go ahead and use Cam's ability to run before he can't use it anymore and while he is reaching his peak of becoming a dynamic running and passing QB like Cunningham was.

So the only 'running' QB so far that anyone has come up with who was not seriously injured is Warren Moon. You are resolved to your 'feelings'....the reality of how the careers of these running QBs deteriorated seem to show otherwise. Young was very successful, but before we know it, he may be diagnosed with CTE like some of these other guys; I don't want that many concussions happening to Cam. It's not IF Cam can run, it's SHOULD there be designated running plays for him. He will always scramble when a play breaks down...& he should, like I've said before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cam almost never got hit on his scrambles or designed runs between the 20's. Never. He always got down or found the sideline unless he was pushing for a 1st down.

His goal line runs come with a little more contact, but even those were often just jumping over a pile or outrunning a linebacker to a corner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cam almost never got hit on his scrambles or designed runs between the 20's. Never. He always got down or found the sideline unless he was pushing for a 1st down.

His goal line runs come with a little more contact, but even those were often just jumping over a pile or outrunning a linebacker to a corner.

I also thought that Cam was very smart on his scrambles with going down before taking hits. That tells me that he fully understands how important he is to this team and how to limit the shots he takes.

However, he took a ton of big shots on the goal line. Those are the carries that I think RR limits him getting this reason. I think this is a big reason we signed a bruising RB like Tolbert. But, we are all just guessing and will have to wait to see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wasn't quoting what you said, obviously. I was stating the facts about how many seasons he had full seasons. You are right about the '87 season, I forgot about the strike.

Wrong. Every year the # of all-pros are higher form the top teams, therefore supporting cast does have something to do with it; suprising you think otherwise.

Then why doesn't Montana have more all-pro selections than Manning, Marino, and Young. Brady only has 3. So you're compeltely wrong. Supporting cast has nothign to do with it

Back then & up until about last year (some now still), the consesus was that rookies who sat for a year or more would be more successful.

Wouldn't that be why he is in a better situation? Do you read what you type before you post?

He had 7 'good' years with maybe 2 'great' years. A career 56.6% completion rate; 81.5% career QB rating; 207-134 TD-INT ratio; average of 2700 yards passing per year ...not 'greatness' in my opinion. Cam's first year: 60% completion percentage (59.96%), 4,051 yds passing, 21-17 TD-INT ratio, 84.5% QB rating.

You're including his backup years. Again, you're providing stats without any context.

Moon makes sense, McNair was seriously beat up & injured, not a good example. McNair his last couple of years could not take off & run...he last his running ability b/c his ribs were broken,etc.

McNair started 153 games out of 161. Thats pretty fuging durable. Again, do you read what you type before you post? Plus, I already just stated that the running ability tops out at about 5-8 years and I already told you what he did for 6 straight seasons.

So the only 'running' QB so far that anyone has come up with who was not seriously injured is Warren Moon. You are resolved to your 'feelings'....the reality of how the careers of these running QBs deteriorated seem to show otherwise. Young was very successful, but before we know it, he may be diagnosed with CTE like some of these other guys; I don't want that many concussions happening to Cam. It's not IF Cam can run, it's SHOULD there be designated running plays for him. He will always scramble when a play breaks down...& he should, like I've said before.

You're making generalizations and not being rational in order to support your argument. Four have been given to you but I can only tell you these things and not make you understand.

Replies in blue

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I originally hated the Miller deal but with the cap projected to rise nearly $10M next season the Canes struck some pretty good deals between Miller and Ehlers. Most of the team is locked in for the next few years. Nikishin will need an extension probably in the $6M AAV range. And Blake will need one if we don’t move him. Personally I’d move Blake, picks, and any prospect not named Nikishin/Nadeau/Artamonov for McTavish as I don’t see any any of the big time players moving teams next year. Realistically the Hurricanes should just target Gustavsson next year to fix the goal tending issue. But I’m all for moving Blake, picks, and prospects for McTavish this year. Ehlers - Aho - Jarvis Svechnikov - McTavish - Stankoven Martinook - Staal - Carrier Hall - Kotkaniemi - Robinson Jost - Jankowski Slavin - Miller Nikishin - Chatfield Gostisbehere - Walker Reilly Andersen Kochetkov I’d do Blake, Felix-Unger-Sorum, and 27 2nd for McTavish.
    • Very true on the length but stuff like this is never where we shine. We aren’t a good team at drafting.
    • Homerism aside, the more I see from Dan, the more impressed I am.  His player evaluation instincts. Last year his 2 premier FA signings, Hunt and Lewis COMPLETELY changed the line and I have a feeling his success in choosing blue chip guys will continue.  Look at the panthers’s rep for FA signings in the past. By and large, it’s been guys 1 year past their prime who had an injury and suckered our GM in to a crippling contract. We never get nice things. When was the last time this team signed 2 young blue chip studs  in the same offseason to contracts worthy of their impact? Ever?  Im telling y’all, players respect and trust Morgan. 
×
×
  • Create New...