Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Random Trivia Thread


Sapper

Recommended Posts

Okay, so maybe a little tough first 2 questions to start off the thread; especially being a mainly NFL thread and Monty Hall Paradox being pretty hard to grasp.

Question 1 answer: (I prefaced this by saying pro teams, but neglected to specify I meant NFL, NBA, NHL, MLB. No discredit to soccer or the WNBA, I was just looking for the big 4. The answer is Miami Heat, Utah Jazz, OKC Thunder, Orlando Magic, Minnesota Wild, Colorado Avalanche, Tampa Bay Lightning, Boston Red Sox and Chicago White Sox.

Question 2 answer: Switching picks gives you a severe advantage. A 1/3 chance becomes a 2/3 chance by switching.

In an attempt to make the thread a little less hard for a Saturday, question number 3 follows.

Now I am no math whiz and could be wrong (probably am) but wouldn't the odds remain the same? In and of itself if you do not switch you have still picked.Wouldn't the odds at that point be 50/50 no matter what?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I cheated because I was curious, I won't spoil it, but I would have never, ever guessed it.

I got it wrong the first time I guessed myself - so no harm in cheating (I thought it was John Williams; Hint: it isn't John Williams) but leave a question of your own! I love sharing trivia.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now I am no math whiz and could be wrong (probably am) but wouldn't the odds remain the same? In and of itself if you do not switch you have still picked.Wouldn't the odds at that point be 50/50 no matter what?

Conceptually, it more about the fact that by eliminating one of the remaining doors, the host increases your odds of choosing correctly. But since it is not possible for the host to eliminate the door you originally chose, your first choice was made without the increased odds

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Conceptually, it more about the fact that by eliminating one of the remaining doors, the host increases your odds of choosing correctly. But since it is not possible for the host to eliminate the door you originally chose, your first choice was made without the increased odds

Therefore, increasing the odds of the host being a complete troll to your original decision...all to hype up the crowd and pause for a commercial break. You be the judge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I would write “give remmers tight end help” on a yellow sticky note and stuck it in shulas playbook the night before superbowl 50. 
    • And don’t worry about Bryce he will be great… Peyton Manning had a horrible rookie year too 😂
    • Nothing wrong with it at all until you start telling others they are bad fans or not fans. But you are the good fan because you never say negative stuff about the team.    I did many years of that type of uninformed fanning because there really was no info and coverage like there is with the internet.    I mean, I used to go to the store and get Street and Smith’s annual football issue. That was about the extent of what you could get if you didn’t live in a big city with sportswriters covering and reporting.  There was no video to look at or replay the games and if you didn’t live in the market you could only rarely see your football team play.    TI have fanned since being a kid in the early 1960s, and as late as 1995 - ‘97 I lived in Atlanta and good luck getting more than 3 or 4 games a year on TV. No radio either. No print coverage outside of an AP recap and box unless they played Atlanta.  People today that have always had the network connection don’t know.    I wasn’t very educated about the Panthers until I finally got internet. 
×
×
  • Create New...