Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

one more peppers article


panther4life

Recommended Posts

Just finished doing some research and I think I know what Peppers is doing. He has til July 22nd to try and get traded. If past that point he doesnt get traded the only team he can sign with is the Panthers for 1 year. Couple years ago Asante Samuals and Lance Briggs held out and got stipulations in their contracts that if they signed the 1 year tender that they would not get franchised next year. I can see that coming with Peppers. Now the team doesnt have to do that they can just let him sit out a year and franchise him again next year if they want.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A "non-exclusive" franchise player must be offered a one-year contract for an amount no less than the average of the top five salaries at the player's position in the previous year, or 120 percent of the player's previous year's salary, whichever is greater.

So if Peppers does not play in 2009 season, we can techincally tag him in 2010 for the amount of the top five salaries at the DE position.. because his 2009 salary would effectively be $0. Thus, we franchise tag him for less than $17 million. Of course, this could only happen if he sits out the entire 2009 season. But, if he did sign the $17million tag, then we would have to tag him at about $20 million next season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just finished doing some research and I think I know what Peppers is doing. He has til July 22nd to try and get traded. If past that point he doesnt get traded the only team he can sign with is the Panthers for 1 year. Couple years ago Asante Samuals and Lance Briggs held out and got stipulations in their contracts that if they signed the 1 year tender that they would not get franchised next year. I can see that coming with Peppers. Now the team doesnt have to do that they can just let him sit out a year and franchise him again next year if they want.

This is the fact. Peppers cant sit out this year because he will be 30 next year and everyone knows your stock takes a huge hit when that rolls around. No team is gonna invest in him long term if he wants to make a switch and that apparent because no one even sniff at him this off-season. The fact remains signing a long term deal with the Panthers would be the best thing he could do. Not saying he's gonna do that but no team is gonna give him loads of money and a long term deal except us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the fact. Peppers cant sit out this year because he will be 30 next year and everyone knows your stock takes a huge hit when that rolls around. No team is gonna invest in him long term if he wants to make a switch and that apparent because no one even sniff at him this off-season. The fact remains signing a long term deal with the Panthers would be the best thing he could do. Not saying he's gonna do that but no team is gonna give him loads of money and a long term deal except us.

You never know he might. Look at it this way would you want him to sit out a year maybe not play the next year. Or give him the guarantee that if he plays this year you wont franchise him next year. Honestly we got alot out of Peppers sure some draft picks would be nice but letting him walk after this season I wouldnt mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You never know he might. Look at it this way would you want him to sit out a year maybe not play the next year. Or give him the guarantee that if he plays this year you wont franchise him next year. Honestly we got alot out of Peppers sure some draft picks would be nice but letting him walk after this season I wouldnt mind.

The dude is weird so anythings possible but if anything I would think the panthers would want him to be committed at least 2 years. Right now he has really no leverage and most teams have not even blinked twice at him. If I had to make a guess i would go with JOAT and say he signs long term because he knows no one will give him what he wants.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The dude is weird so anythings possible but if anything I would think the panthers would want him to be committed at least 2 years. Right now he has really no leverage and most teams have not even blinked twice at him. If I had to make a guess i would go with JOAT and say he signs long term because he knows no one will give him what he wants.

....thus, ***** us again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we don't go OT, we will regret it.  What bothers me?  Are we going to get a starting-caliber OT at 19?  I think the draft is solid at OT, and the more I read up and watch video, the more I watch Lomu, the more I want him.   I see Freeling as a RT who needs some work in run blocking (since we need to run first, maybe not a good fit) and I see Proctor ending up as a Guard.  After Lomu (assuming Mouigia and fanu are gone), I think we wait until round 2.  In round 2, there are about 3-4 I like (Zuhn--good pass blocker and VERY underrated right now; Tiernan is a very good pass blocker as is Miller from Clemson, but both are not good in the run game.  Max Ixxxxx from Ariz St is impressive too---technically, there is not a of difference in these second tier guys--good in pass pro, need work in the run game.   If we wait until round 2 for an OT, we probably need to sign Nijman and start him early.   I almost think this is what we should do if Lomu is gone.  There is a big dropoff after him, imo, and I think we'd get better value if a stud ILB or edge is there.  Someone like TJ Parker Clemson makes sense. If Lomu is gone, trading back might be the play.  
    • And what is x gunna help with except show him what not to do. Plus for the first year and a half he was just an obstacle 
    • I understand that some people want WR. I am solidly against using yet another high pick there. Coker is pretty good and we used No picks on him.  What I think we really need at WR is a little bit of a Smitty lite. It is ridiculous to say let’s get a Smitty because you just can’t do that, but someone not tall and long striding but more in his mold. I think we’d have a pretty well rounded group.    Looking at tackle, with replacing Moton looming, it just seems like the no brainer.  You fill in Icky short term. Depending on how he recovers, and how the new guy plays, you go from there. A tackle at 19 is most likely either a LOT, a ROT, or a big talented guard, at worst. We will need all three in the next couple of years.  I would love to have a stud ILB be there at 19 but the OL is the responsible thing to do I believe. 
×
×
  • Create New...