Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Charlotte could amnesty Diop tomorrow


carolinaAl

Recommended Posts

$26 million is way to much to pay to amnesty someone.

Usually you only amnesty players for cap room and that is something the Cats don't really need right now unless they plan on acquiring Kris Humphries and need extra cash to make it happen.

Regardless, I am assuming that Stein just went through teams rosters and picked out guys who he thought would be good amnesty candidates.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

for what its worth, rick bonnell mentioned this on a radio interview on wfnz today. i imagine that is where stein is getting this from

Thanks for the heads up, wasn't sure if Stein just went through teams rosters and picked out players that looked like good amnesty candidates or if he actually has inside info.

Bonnell is fairly accurate, so I would say there is a 75% chance that Diop gets amnesty.

Everyone say goodbye to the resident dinosaur.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

$26 million is way to much to pay to amnesty someone.

Usually you only amnesty players for cap room and that is something the Cats don't really need right now unless they plan on acquiring Kris Humphries and need extra cash to make it happen.

Regardless, I am assuming that Stein just went through teams rosters and picked out guys who he thought would be good amnesty candidates.

I don't think we should amnesty either one this year. We don't need the money. What we should do is wait until we need the cap room to use it. Thomas is scheduled to make 9.4 million in 2014 when we might actually have a chance at signing a good player in free agency.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, if I understand the amnesty rules correctly, you amnesty the player, their salary comes off your cap, there is a blind auction for the player by all other teams, and the auction winner gets the player for the salary they bid and the Bobcats would have to pay him the difference on the remainder of his contract?

So Diop is owed 7.3 million for this season - I guess we will end up paying about 7.28 million, cause nobody is gonna bid jack for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, if I understand the amnesty rules correctly, you amnesty the player, their salary comes off your cap, there is a blind auction for the player by all other teams, and the auction winner gets the player for the salary they bid and the Bobcats would have to pay him the difference on the remainder of his contract?

So Diop is owed 7.3 million for this season - I guess we will end up paying about 7.28 million, cause nobody is gonna bid jack for him.

You're correct, the only reason to amnesty Diop is to free up more cap space so that we can throw more money at Landry or Humphries; otherwise this would be a dumb move (being that he is already in the last year of his contract) when they could just use the cap space (in a pretty good free agent class) next year and not have to pay him anything.

If the Cats amnesty Diop, they will have two roster spots to fill rather than one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...