Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Replacement Refs


Anybodyhome

Recommended Posts

Ref'ing has been below average, but it hasn't been nearly as bad as many are making it out to be. The worst of it is the part that doesn't even matter, the not announcing numbers with penalties, verbal mess-ups (calling Atlanta Arizona), etc. In terms of the actual calls, that part hasn't been that much worse than the usual refs. There's been a couple glaring extremes, like in that one game (I forget which) where they tried to say it was a touchback when someone clearly downed it around the 5 and the ball never came close to the endzone, but those mess-ups have been corrected for the most part, with little or no impact on the game. Other than that, it's been the same ol' same ol' with some refs only calling the most obvious penalties (our first game) and some calling every little possible thing (our second game). I watched part of the Bears-Skins game today and that ref looked to be just as sharp as a regular ref, comfortable making the calls, called the calls the right way, etc. I only watched about a quarter though, so I dunno if there were any bad calls or not, I'm just talking about his demeanor, which is what most of the refs I've seen have been deficient in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

JawnyBlaze, I watched the same game and saw 3-4 really bad calls in the first half (but most were in the 2nd quarter), almost all of them on pass interferences, both on calls and no calls being really bad. I mean there was the one call where a receiver was angled out of bounds by a DB and it was called pass interference. He didn't shove him out or anything, the receiver just ran out of bounds.

I know this is a process but they are making some bad missteps. Best they get them out of the way now I guess...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you're talking about the Bears-Skins, like I said, I didn't watch most of the game. I'm also not saying they're doing as good a job as regular refs, but I really don't see a huge difference other than a few really bad calls. I think they're doing about as good a job as anyone could being thrown into it with such little time to prepare for it.

On a related note, I find it hilarious the overt smear campaign Florio is holding at PFT. With plenty of topics to discuss, almost every article of his is trying to point out how horribly the replacement refs are. If anything, he is making me more sympathetic to the guys.

Yes, there's been some laughably bad calls that wouldn't have happened with the regular refs, but no I don't think it's not going to get any better. Just like with anything, with practice will come as close to perfect as the usual refs. One of Florio's favorite points is "these guys aren't acceptable because if they were they'd be striking right now" but it seems the referee corps is just like a lot of things in the NFL, a good ol' boys club where you'd REALLY have to F up to get fired. Nothing I've seen so far is as bad as the Tuck Rule call, or Hochuli's call in the Denver-Chargers game a couple years ago or any number of hilariously bad calls over the past few years and yet those guys are still refs. At least the new guys have an excuse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Can we stop with the stupid attention whore hot take type posts and just enjoy a winning streak for once? 
    • Every player has faults, and many times they can be categorized neatly into obvious traits that make analysis pretty straight-forward. A running back who thrives in zone schemes where their vision and patience is rewarded may struggle when asked to play a physical, violent, north-south style. A quarterback who can make every throw under the sun may never grasp the schematic purpose of the plays he is being asked to run and therefore constantly makes the wrong decision or no decision even with players running free. But the narrative for Bryce Young has almost consistently focused on his size and overall physicality in a league full of supermen, and how it places a hard limit on his ability to do things like shrug off blockers or throw tactical nuclear strikes from 80 yards out. Two seasons plus in hasn't put those concerns fully to rest, but if there is one underlining trait that could potentially derail Bryce's career, it's much more nebulous: his ability to recognize when a play is dead. The proclivity for turnovers that has haunted Bryce through his career doesn't always have the same underlying reasons as most typical young quarterbacks: adjusting to the speed of play, the tightness of NFL throwing windows, being able to diagnose much more advanced coverages, understanding the playbook, etc. One consistent thread is a defining trait that is both a curse and a strength: his ability to make plays off script, which has carried over from his Alabama days. For every miracle escape and razor-margin throw downfield like the 4th down play vs the Dolphins, you seem to have an inexcusable dropped fumble without even being touched (also see Dolphins game.) And the genesis of both is his underlying aggressiveness to make something happen with every snap, sometimes even when the play itself is simply unsalvageable. What often gets Young into trouble isn't an inability to execute a play, but his unwillingness to concede that the risk/reward ratio for a given decision simply isn't worth the attempt. There are few things that will drive a coach to putting a schematic leash on a player more quickly then when that player's outcomes become unpredictable, and even multiple miracle plays can be negated by a single colossal mistake. Where Bryce must find a balance is retaining the ability to conjure magic when needed, but to also keep his risk/reward instincts fully calibrated to what the team as a whole is comfortable with. No successful coach is entirely risk-averse, and many tend to be overly conservative in situations that decides the outcome of games, but "bad" Bryce sometimes emerges in situations where the only correct decision is to simply eat the ball and move on to the next play or next drive. If he can develop a better understanding of this flaw and work to overcome it without abandoning the traits that also make him special, he will take one step closer to becoming the player this franchise sacrificed so much for and redeeming that faith with the entire fanbase.
    • Is there a fifth option for welded shut and hermetically sealed?
×
×
  • Create New...