Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Told ya so


SCP

Recommended Posts

Our defense looked good in the second half.

Our O would've been much better with an actual running game maybe who knows.

Point is Beason is back Davis is back Dwan Edwards looks beastly and the D plays like it did in the second half we'll do fine.

Seriously though start Stew.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are yall fuging stupid?

The D was not the issue. I actually think they played remarkably better than last year. We stopped the run ALL day.

However, the offense too k far too long to get going

.

Fugging rookie almost busted us for 100 yards

Link to comment
Share on other sites

fuging rookie was their premeir back and a lion's share of the carries. Once LB went down, it was the rookies game. We held this rookie to a >100 yard game.

You're looking at it from the wrong perspective, brah.

Outplayed

Out coached

Out muscled

Link to comment
Share on other sites

how did rivera get out coached by greg schiano....

again i'm so f***ing happy we decided to not at least take a look at Jim Harbaugh who is now easily the best head coach in the nfl

I think we even went so far as to scoff at the idea of hiring him. Maybe Jim wouldn't put up with Hurneys bullshit ass drafting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I've liked him since his rookie year as a prospect, but when he's been asked to play in a large capacity, he has simply not done well.   He does not really add anything, rather muddies up the room.  Fant is TERRIBLE as a blocker, a pure receiving TE.   Let's just put Tremble aside since he's PUP (although I still like him as a TE2, but yeah he's not our future starter)... Sanders has already shown better receiving skills than a Fant and has a nice ceiling.  Not to mention, he's got in-line run blocking skills.  I really want to see what he's capable of this year.  Also has a year+ experience now in Canales' offense, not to mention legit chemistry with Bryce. And after Sanders, I also imagine our staff is waiting to see how Mitchell Evans looks in camp as he's got the in-line blocking skills.  If he looks fully capable of filling in behind Sanders, then I don't see a need.  Overall, keep an eye out on early August moves.  They are usually soft indicators of how staff's view their rookie late rounders and roster overall.  This is a wait and see what the market presents and how they think their unit looks in camp.  
    • Every team has different needs of the backup QB.   On some teams a young hopeful makes sense and on others an old worn out dude makes sense.  We are a little more in the in-between IMO where you probably would prefer a Fields, Pickett, Howell type IMO.   So a young disappoint that you there is still some hail mary hope in.....given BY essentially was benched both seasons for performance (I know that's not the official line going into Seattle but I think most would agree he got a break and should of been benched later that year).  I know we want Bryce to be the week 17 guy all season this upcoming year.  But it's still in the reasonable thought process that the other dude could show back up. 
    • I wouldn't mind it if they bring him in cheap for competition. I would imagine he would vie for the 3rd TE spot with the rookie. 
×
×
  • Create New...