Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

California Legalizes Self-Driving Cars


NanuqoftheNorth

Recommended Posts

152766138.jpg.CROP.rectangle3-large.jpg

California Gov. Jerry Brown, California State Sen. Alex Padilla, and Google co-founder Sergey Brin exit a self-driving car at the Google headquarters in Mountain View on Sept. 25

Gov. Jerry Brown on Tuesday signed a bill legalizing autonomous vehicles on the state’s roadways. The allows Google to test out its self-driving car in the state immediately, provided there’s a licensed driver in the driver’s seat to take over if needed, according to the San Francisco Chronicle. (In fact, Google was already testing its cars in the state, on the assumption that it was legal as long as there was no law specifically prohibiting it. But now it’s definitely legal.) And it paves the way for manufacturers to begin selling autonomous cars to consumers by January 2015.

The Chronicle notes, however, that the bill leaves a lot of unanswered questions for the Department of Motor Vehicles to sort out. I’ve posed a few in past blog posts: What happens when the cops pull over a self-driving car? And are autonomous vehicles really going to obey the speed limit? Because that would be annoying. The Chronicle has more:

… Who's responsible if a driverless car causes an accident while in autonomous mode, the manufacturer or the person in the car at the time? How should insurance policies be crafted? How safe is safe enough? How should these vehicles be evaluated against that goal? And how do you create regulations for technology that's still under development?http://www.slate.com...ons_to_dmv.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It won't be long after these become available that they will be given their own lanes on freeways, allowing these fully automated vehicles to demonstrate their inherent superiority to conventional cars. This will come in part due to the lobbying efforts of manufacturers to ensure the demise of conventional cars and spur purchases of their latest products.

If you actually own a fully automated vehicle your insurance rates will be a fraction of what rates are for conventional cars. Eventually insurance rates for manually driven vehicles will become prohibitive for all but the richest individuals. Ultimately, few if any vehicles will be allowed to be manually driven on the public streets and highways.

Most people will eventually stop buying automobiles. A service industry will develop similar to taxicabs but without the driver.

Instead of millions of cars sitting idle in garages or parking lots all day they will be transporting other clients while you are at work or home. A lot of new land will become available for development once traditional parking lots fail to generate sufficient revenue.

In the future manually driving a car will be similar to riding a horse. There will be places to go for the small minority that still want to drive. Those places will likely be out in the country where we can "stable" our cars and continue the expensive novelty of driving ourselves.

Emergency vehicles, dump trucks, buses, trains and planes will all be fully automated around the same timeline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

uh huh great. so they are gunna let drones fly our us even thought the hacking community has come forward and shown that they can be hack. In response the government has said we will make cars do it 2.

Ill keep buying classics thank you - the kind they cant auto shut down.

Plus this will get rid of the car chase. They will just have the car drive you to the jail.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Plus this will get rid of the car chase. They will just have the car drive you to the jail.

I could definately see where a wanted individual would be forced to walk everywhere.

The first time they entered a fully automated vehicle it might ID them and they would be directly transported to the hoosegow. No passing Go, no collecting two hundred dollars.

On the up side people would likely no longer have to worry about DWI or speeding tickets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I could definately see where a wanted individual would be forced to walk everywhere.

The first time they entered a fully automated vehicle it might ID them and they would be directly transported to the hoosegow. No passing Go, no collecting two hundred dollars.

On the up side people would likely no longer have to worry about DWI or speeding tickets.

So you are saying the cops and the lawyers and the traffic courts will just go away? They will just start ticking different things like having gone 6 minutes without a sync update or using old software.

They wont get rid of the easy money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you are saying the cops and the lawyers and the traffic courts will just go away? They will just start ticking different things like having gone 6 minutes without a sync update or using old software.

They wont get rid of the easy money.

Ambulance chasers and municipal courts/police depts will certainly try and morph into something else in an attempt to preserve their livelyhoods, that is a given.

So will hospitals / emergency rooms, insurance companies, autobody shops and car dealerships, just for starters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

original.jpg

http://jalopnik.com/...robot-youll-own

Driverless cars will be the first robot you ever own.

Lets get this started by really thinking about what it will mean to have an autonomous self-driving car. For the sake of our thought-experiments, let's assume it's, oh, 2025, when most companies seem to agree we'll definately have self-driving cars being sold regularly. If it helps, you can also imagine you're wearing a silver jumpsuit and eating pizzas-in-pills, too.

And here's something else exciting to consider: autonomous cars will likely be the first actual, genuine robot people will own. I mean beyond the little electronic trilobites that half-assedly vacuum some of our homes. A real robot, a computer that process the real world and affects it physically back. We're calling them "cars" but make no mistake: those Google Prii are robots, zipping up and down Lombard street.

And, while we're wondering, what about sending a pet to the vet in a driverless car? Or a kid to school? Can your car run errands for you while you're at work? Will new types of commercial spaces develop with fully automated drive-through systems? Should autonomous cars be designed with a standard for automated cargo loading and unloading? Could you send you car to get you lunch, and have it pay with your credit card data stored on it, transmitted wirelessly? The more you think about it, the more it becomes clear that moving people from place to place is only one part of what driverless cars can do.

http://jalopnik.com/...robot-youll-own

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is a comment that takes it to the next level...

Robot cars? Yup. they're our first step. I'd hope we make choices - however difficult - that integrate our consciousness into robot systems today. stripped of fear, hate, reluctance. Able to grow far beyond.

For cars, that means so so so much more than "driving." Total sensory immersion into a new environment. Sure, at first it will be like a hokey "v-world" interaction that's really still synthetic. But that's just the beginning. Say I could upload my consciousness from body to body - including robot bodies like cars. If my real body dies, that which you are stuck in is now you. Being John Malkovich with car chases and door dings

.

If the system is reasonably robust however, and sustainable on whatever planet it operates ideally then that could be a pretty cool way to actually "live."

Our lives are defined by a meatspace body, yet our brains create far beyond it. Robot cars now, anything you can imagine later.

Comment by Jon Zeke

Jalopnik.com "The First Robot You'll Own"

http://jalopnik.com/...robot-youll-own

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Exactly what I was going to say. Brady seems to be taking a page out of Olsen's playbook, which is probably a good thing. They'll probably get around to giving Brady an Emmy one day, and he should thank Olsen for giving him the blueprint for success.
    • In before: "XL sucks, there is no hope." "As long as we have Bryce, none of this matters." My response: "It's X, not XL...we're not discussing apparel sizes, or we'd have to consider XS."  
    • Alain Pierre provides some food for thought on Last Word On Sports regarding Xavier Legette, and his article, though specifically on X, kind of puts me in the mind of QBs being overdrafted and put into situations that they're not prepared for, some ultimately failing due to drafting missteps by front offices who don't necessarily view prospective players within the contextual importance that situations demand.  At this point, Legette looks like a failure in reference to expectations, of not only what a consistently productive NFL receiver looks like, but a first round pick (which he obviously should never have been). But the story on X isn't necessarily completely over. Damn. I seem to be experiencing deja vu...It wasn't X's fault that he was overdrafted, that was a choice by an FO that obviously downplayed actual realized skill vs outstanding measurables and upside. Sure, the FO was impressed by X's one-year feats during his senior season at South Carolina, but it was the NFL god, RAS (a.k.a. Raw Athletic Score), that had Dave Canales's and Dan Morgan's jaws dropping in amazement at the sight of X running around in underwear at the Combine...   "At 6-foot-3 and over 220 pounds, Legette brought rare athletic upside to the position. His breakout season at South Carolina showed flashes of dominance that NFL teams dream of. Projecting forward, many scouts compared his physical profile to D.K. Metcalf, and the Panthers clearly believed they could develop him into a true wide receiver 1 over time. The issue was never his talent. The issue was the timeline. Just a few picks later, the Chargers selected Ladd McConkey, a receiver who may have lacked Xavier Legette’s physical ceiling but entered the league far more technically refined. McConkey immediately showed advanced route discipline, leverage awareness, good pacing, and separation ability.  Bryce Young’s game has always depended on timing and anticipation. His best football at Alabama came with receivers capable of winning through precision rather than pure athleticism. Jameson Williams and John Metchie III were excellent route runners and were able to get drafted in 2022. McConkey naturally fit that style of play. Legette, meanwhile, needed significant development in the exact areas where Bryce Young needed help. The Panthers drafted traits when Bryce Young needed reliability."   Yes, the FO was guilty. The good thing is that the execs appear to be improving. Some of that may be attributed to the hiring of Eric Eager (who was hired right after the Xavier Legette draft). Eager seems to have helped the Panthers FO fine-tune their analytical progress, and, at least on paper, they acquired players with a lot of value during the last draft in regards to actually (what I'll refer to as) "underdrafting" talent relative to their position with value already built in.  Look at Chris Brazzell: He may be more of the quintessential project receiver who was arguably more or less just as raw as Legette was when he was drafted, and with a relatively high RAS as well. The notable difference is value, as Brazzell was a round three pick and Legette was a first rounder.    "Unlike the Xavier Legette situation, Carolina’s environment for Brazzell is completely different. "The Panthers are not asking a raw receiver prospect to stabilize this offense for Bryce Young. "Brazzell enters a much healthier developmental situation with far less pressure. With Tetairoa McMillan established as the primary target and Jalen Coker continuing to settle as the number 2 option...Xavier Legette, Metchie III, and Jimmy Horn Jr. are also still in this rotation, fighting for reps. "It gives Carolina something they failed to give Legette when they drafted him: A developmental runway. "Xavier Legette entered the league with expectations attached to a first-round pick and an offense desperate for answers. Brazzell enters a room where he can spend a year working on his route running, learning the playbook, and earning snaps gradually rather than being asked to become part of Bryce Young’s solution immediately. "And truthfully, Brazzell needs that time coming out of college. Despite his elite physical tools, many evaluators have several concerns about his overall polish as a receiver. "His route tree at Tennessee was viewed as fairly limited due to the type of offense that they run. The receivers are expected to run a lot of choice routes, which are dictated by the placement of the defenders. It doesn’t require technical route-running and an understanding of the playbook needed at the NFL level...   "Context changes significantly when expectations change. "The Panthers are not depending on Brazzell to save the offense. They can allow him to develop slowly, expand his route tree, improve his technical refinement, and learn behind a much more stable receiver room... "Traits become much easier to bet on when patience is built into the plan."   It's all about understanding your situation. I don't agree that it's an inherently difficult choice like the author is suggesting in the following excerpt. At the very least, I think that it should be easier as long as all parties involved stay levelheaded and true to their process.    "That is what makes these draft decisions so difficult. "Every front office believes it can find the next Metcalf, Owens, or Marshall. Sometimes they do. More often, they are betting on a development path that may take years to complete. "The challenge is understanding what your offense needs right now. "If a team has patience, stability, and a quarterback capable of carrying the offense while a receiver develops, betting on traits can make sense. But if a young quarterback needs immediate help, there is a strong argument for prioritizing the receiver who already knows how to separate, create throwing , and earn trust from day one. "That’s why the Xavier Legette-Ladd McConkey debate remains so fascinating. "It was never really a discussion about talent. It was a discussion about timing."   For me, Ladd McConkey was talented enough in his own right, that the gap--the upside--was never as big as people are suggesting between not only McConkey and Legette, but McConkey and other receivers drafted in the first round during that draft. The technique divide between Ladd and X was pretty stark though, as was the roughly 35 pounds, but the speed was identical, the maybe 1½ height difference isn't huge (6' and 6'1"), and it may surprise some that Ladd's RAS (9.34) was also enough to put him in the top 10 percent of receivers since 1987. There is an argument that he would've been a better pick for Bryce and the Panthers, regardless of timeline and talent. But, I still appreciate the thesis (if you will) of the article, as it still provides some hope--perhaps a glimmer at this point, that X's RAS may finally translate to the NFL given more time, but, perhaps more importantly, it explains how Dan Morgan and company are showing improvement, even if it appears somewhat understated. My hope is that continued improvement is palpable by this time next year. https://lastwordonsports.com/nfl/2026/05/30/xavier-legette-draft-lessons/#google_vignette        
×
×
  • Create New...