Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Stuck between 4-3 and 3-4?


beastson

Recommended Posts

I really don't want to beat a dead horse, but there's no reason with Rivera as HC the D shouldn't performing well

I feel like we're stuck between a 4-3 and 3-4 and IMO we should be operating a lot in the 3-4 with as many LB we have. On every 3rd down, it should be a blitz

Game planning is seriously the key. We have enough guys to rotate and bring to get pressure. You should know what they're going to run on 3rd and get everybody right. Maybe we are still in a learning phase

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we should seriously start looking at runninng a 34 in the future. I know we don't have the players for it yet but a couple of guys in FA and two players in the first two rounds should help a lot.

Kuechly and Beason are mikes. CJ could possibly slide back there as a rushing OLB. The two Edwards had some experiences playin NT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really don't want to beat a dead horse, but there's no reason with Rivera as HC the D shouldn't performing well I feel like we're stuck between a 4-3 and 3-4 and IMO we should be operating a lot in the 3-4 with as many LB we have. On every 3rd down, it should be a blitz Game planning is seriously the key. We have enough guys to rotate and bring to get pressure. You should know what they're going to run on 3rd and get everybody right. Maybe we are still in a learning phase

You say we have a lot of backers, but what you forgot to add is that ZERO of our lbs are suited for a 3-4.....it's fine in certain situations, but running a 3-4 exclusively would make this defense more abysmal then it already is.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I meant write off in the entire class being absolute garbage and that being on Dan  FA was pretty solid but Dan and Brandt handing out one big terrible contract to Turk Wharton. Milton was their top target and the pivot from Milton to Turk while paying Turk what they did was insane.  Id LOVE to know had we not paid Turk what type of contract he would’ve received. 3/30 mayyyybe? This is someone Brandt obviously vouched for.  I’ve watched a few of Tilis’ interviews now. One with Jourdan and one with Yates. He’s a big Moneyball fan. Giving Turk the deal they gave him is the complete opposite of the whole Moneyball idea. They paid a dude who they saw some potential in money that you’d pay someone that has actually made an impact  The worst part is that he’s 100% here next year too. That contract keeps him here until 2027 for sure 
    • Are you kidding? They just now figured out they could use someone else for a qb sneak. 
    • The biggest problem is that his upward trend is still well below NFL average. At some point there's just too much evidence to ignore. I've been there for awhile now. Honestly, it only took a handful of games for me to realize that he just had too many physical limitations to overcome to ever be a legitimate starter. I get that the organization couldn't afford to pull the plug that quick after that investment but there's absolutely no way we should've gone into year three without legitimate competition on the roster. We always a year behind kn this Bryce thing. This year should've been the legit competition year and this offseason should've been the moving on point. Hopefully we'll play catch up but I expect the trend to cj tinge and next year will be the vet competition year. 
×
×
  • Create New...