Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Andre Neblett


1989

Recommended Posts

I like Andre and thought he was our best 3 tech last year, but there is no guarantee he will be back. We still don't know much about his high blood pressure/anxiety problems. It's just strange we haven't heard anyone talk about him, nor have we heard from him. And keep in mind he will need some time to get acclimated assuming he does come back.

Let's say he does come back. Who do we drop to free up the spot?

Probably Frank Kearse

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like Andre and thought he was our best 3 tech last year, but there is no guarantee he will be back. We still don't know much about his high blood pressure/anxiety problems. It's just strange we haven't heard anyone talk about him, nor have we heard from him. And keep in mind he will need some time to get acclimated assuming he does come back.

Let's say he does come back. Who do we drop to free up the spot?

It sure won't be Dwan. Kearse maybe? But I don't see that happening either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was thinking Campbell too, but then I got to thinking that I doubt we would get rid of him just like that after we drafted him. He doesn't ever play but Rivera really likes him. Kearse was just brought in to be another body. It isn't like he has shined. There is no way we keep 5 DT around. Edwards, Edwards, Fua, Kearse, Neblett.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Campbell will make it to the PS. Highly doubt they'd cut Kearse.

Thanks for pointing this out. I should have mentioned it in my original post. Whether it's when/if we bring back Neblett or when/if we activate Gettis, Campbell is a likely candidate to join the PS. He's eligible, he is not doing much at all right now (maybe some special teams), and he's not likely to get poached by another team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Doubling tripling and quadrupling down on this subject in defense of the pick is reminiscent of a certain mindset that has overtaken the political world. This conversation will become less contentious and dragged out to the point of becoming a dead beaten horse if rational minds can simply agree that we made a mistake missed on a potential franchise center and we will learn from it. All this coping is unnecessary.
    • Here in lies the rub that the supporting posters continue to ignore. He wasn’t a 2nd round pick in the 2025 class, especially with an ACL tear. It was a dumb pick for any GM who looks ahead to determine values. C and CB were much better values than an injured RB in 2024. If a RB isn’t even playing much in 2024, you have to compare him to 2025. We’re beating a dead horse but only because the defense of the pick is almost comical at this point. We’ve made a ton of poo picks and moves/non trades while Morgan was GM and the assistant GM. It happens, we don’t have to jump through hoops to act like we just had some really bad luck. The 2025 draft class is unknown so far but damn it felt way better afterwards for the first time in a long time. Embrace the potential and stop stamping guaranteed on the box of poo of the 2018-2024 drafts. We are were we aware because of them and 2025 has to hit so we can get past the 7 win max in 7 year hurdle. Also, “flashed his talent” isn’t 9 carries for 22 yards. His one reception for 18 yards isn’t a flash with 11 other touches for 27 yards. He hasn’t proven anything. We have no idea if he’ll contribute in 2026.
    • Oh for those tired of the Mannings I have bad news, Peytons son Marshal already has college teams after him and he isn't even in HS until this fall...   I'd wager we have two Mannings in the NFL in 2030
×
×
  • Create New...