Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Andre Neblett


1989

Recommended Posts

I like Andre and thought he was our best 3 tech last year, but there is no guarantee he will be back. We still don't know much about his high blood pressure/anxiety problems. It's just strange we haven't heard anyone talk about him, nor have we heard from him. And keep in mind he will need some time to get acclimated assuming he does come back.

Let's say he does come back. Who do we drop to free up the spot?

Probably Frank Kearse

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like Andre and thought he was our best 3 tech last year, but there is no guarantee he will be back. We still don't know much about his high blood pressure/anxiety problems. It's just strange we haven't heard anyone talk about him, nor have we heard from him. And keep in mind he will need some time to get acclimated assuming he does come back.

Let's say he does come back. Who do we drop to free up the spot?

It sure won't be Dwan. Kearse maybe? But I don't see that happening either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was thinking Campbell too, but then I got to thinking that I doubt we would get rid of him just like that after we drafted him. He doesn't ever play but Rivera really likes him. Kearse was just brought in to be another body. It isn't like he has shined. There is no way we keep 5 DT around. Edwards, Edwards, Fua, Kearse, Neblett.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Campbell will make it to the PS. Highly doubt they'd cut Kearse.

Thanks for pointing this out. I should have mentioned it in my original post. Whether it's when/if we bring back Neblett or when/if we activate Gettis, Campbell is a likely candidate to join the PS. He's eligible, he is not doing much at all right now (maybe some special teams), and he's not likely to get poached by another team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It will be really interesting to see how both sides handle this. I'm sure the team would love to get him signed to a 4 year deal based on his output so far and some potential factored in, i.e. something like a 4 year $30 million contract.  But I could see his agent telling him the best path is to take the one year offer, put up a big year next year and then really cash in. The team also has to keep in mind T-Mac's 2nd contract, which likely will happen after the 2027 season assuming he keeps improving as expected.  Even if we could get him on a budget 4 year deal for what he could become, the problem then becomes when he wants to re-negotiate in 2 years during the same summer we will extend T-Mac, and you don't want to spend that much on WRs in one offseason, just see the Bengals this last year. Taking everything into consideration, I'm thinking the 1 year deal and then getting him to sign a 4-5 year deal after hopefully say a 800ish yard season next year might be best for our cap situation and separate his and T-Mac's negotiation periods.
    • And yet jax made it no further than we did, and its very possible the Pats don't either. I think it speaks more to the overall down year for the nfl as far as having great/dominant teams, every team this year has fatal flaws that can be exploited 
    • Ehhh I agree the nfc is stronger this year but their really werent any truly dominant teams this year everyone is flawed, I think the narrative for the NFL this year will to try ahd force a Josh Allen SB win
×
×
  • Create New...