Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Andre Neblett


1989

Recommended Posts

I like Andre and thought he was our best 3 tech last year, but there is no guarantee he will be back. We still don't know much about his high blood pressure/anxiety problems. It's just strange we haven't heard anyone talk about him, nor have we heard from him. And keep in mind he will need some time to get acclimated assuming he does come back.

Let's say he does come back. Who do we drop to free up the spot?

Probably Frank Kearse

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like Andre and thought he was our best 3 tech last year, but there is no guarantee he will be back. We still don't know much about his high blood pressure/anxiety problems. It's just strange we haven't heard anyone talk about him, nor have we heard from him. And keep in mind he will need some time to get acclimated assuming he does come back.

Let's say he does come back. Who do we drop to free up the spot?

It sure won't be Dwan. Kearse maybe? But I don't see that happening either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was thinking Campbell too, but then I got to thinking that I doubt we would get rid of him just like that after we drafted him. He doesn't ever play but Rivera really likes him. Kearse was just brought in to be another body. It isn't like he has shined. There is no way we keep 5 DT around. Edwards, Edwards, Fua, Kearse, Neblett.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Campbell will make it to the PS. Highly doubt they'd cut Kearse.

Thanks for pointing this out. I should have mentioned it in my original post. Whether it's when/if we bring back Neblett or when/if we activate Gettis, Campbell is a likely candidate to join the PS. He's eligible, he is not doing much at all right now (maybe some special teams), and he's not likely to get poached by another team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I originally hated the Miller deal but with the cap projected to rise nearly $10M next season the Canes struck some pretty good deals between Miller and Ehlers. Most of the team is locked in for the next few years. Nikishin will need an extension probably in the $6M AAV range. And Blake will need one if we don’t move him. Personally I’d move Blake, picks, and any prospect not named Nikishin/Nadeau/Artamonov for McTavish as I don’t see any any of the big time players moving teams next year. Realistically the Hurricanes should just target Gustavsson next year to fix the goal tending issue. But I’m all for moving Blake, picks, and prospects for McTavish this year. Ehlers - Aho - Jarvis Svechnikov - McTavish - Stankoven Martinook - Staal - Carrier Hall - Kotkaniemi - Robinson Jost - Jankowski Slavin - Miller Nikishin - Chatfield Gostisbehere - Walker Reilly Andersen Kochetkov I’d do Blake, Felix-Unger-Sorum, and 27 2nd for McTavish.
    • Very true on the length but stuff like this is never where we shine. We aren’t a good team at drafting.
    • Homerism aside, the more I see from Dan, the more impressed I am.  His player evaluation instincts. Last year his 2 premier FA signings, Hunt and Lewis COMPLETELY changed the line and I have a feeling his success in choosing blue chip guys will continue.  Look at the panthers’s rep for FA signings in the past. By and large, it’s been guys 1 year past their prime who had an injury and suckered our GM in to a crippling contract. We never get nice things. When was the last time this team signed 2 young blue chip studs  in the same offseason to contracts worthy of their impact? Ever?  Im telling y’all, players respect and trust Morgan. 
×
×
  • Create New...