Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Best 1-3 Team in the Land

TruCatzFan

By TruCatzFan,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

TruCatzFan Newbie

TruCatzFan

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Hahaha the pain has faded eh?

I've pouted all day. Should be 2-2... But we're not. This win certainly would have done wonders for our confidence, but for some reason it wasn't meant to be. Everything happens for a reason. I'm not sure why it happened, but I truly believe that we will get better from what happened today. It pains me to say that, and I've sulked all day and been pissy to my wife for no reason. I can't continue to allow this teams shortcomings to effect me so much.

I truly believe that we'll get better. The team is likely heartbroken, but that will help when they're too tired for one more rep in the gym or one more look during practice. Make no mistake about it... Today sucked and this loss will weigh far more heavily than the Giants loss albeit for a shorter amt of time... But we will get better.

Coaching staff learned some lessons on game management and play calling. Nakamura will likely never get beat deep again (if he sees the field) Cam will squeeze the ball from here on out, Smitty won't make dumb boneheaded plays... The list goes on and on.

We have to get better, we just have to. If we can reel off 3 or 4 in a row... We can get rolling and this will be looked back upon as yes the one that got away, but most importantly the reason they don't want to feel this way ever again. I feel for our players, but this will make everyone... Including this fickle ass fan base stronger in the long run. I refuse to cry over spilt milk... And there ain't poo that anyone can say to me to make me feel differently!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TruCatzFan Newbie

TruCatzFan

Posted
  • Author
Posted

REMAINING SCHEDULE

Seattle (1)

Bye

Dallas (2)

Chicago (3)

Washington (4)

Denver (AFC)

TB

Philly (Mon Night) (5)

KC (AFC)

ATL (6)

SD (AFC)

OAK (AFC)

Saints

So, we will have a direct impact on the records of 6 NFC teams that may or may not go to the playoffs... If we can get those wins alone, and they'd be huge wins... That's 7-3 and we're adding losses to their records and winning tie breakers against them head to head.

It's still early... Anything can and will happen. We must start winning.. That's the bottom line

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • pantherclaw
      Canales doesn't sound all the way sold on Bryce

      By pantherclaw · Posted

      I enjoy being truthful. Although that means being unbiased. Which most on here are incapable of being unbiased. 
    • Raleigh PF
      Giannis

      By Raleigh PF · Posted

      It looks like the Bucks and Giannis are headed for a divorce. He says he's ready to play and the Bucks say that he has told them he isn't. It really doesn't matter except that it likely means the end for Giannis in Milwaukee. He's 31 years old, but still an elite producer.  So, as GM, would you go after him this offseason? Remember, the Hornets have two 1st round picks this year and potentially THREE first round picks next year. What would a trade look like?
    • MHS831
      Some homers' opinions of the OTs that we may realistically be able to get at 19

      By MHS831 · Posted

      I agree with you, if all things are equal--assuming we are on the same page as to what that means.  If a DT and OT are there at 19 and you have them equal, which do you take? The DT would be rotational and get 25 snaps a game or so, and the OT is probably a reserve for most of the season.  What if Walker plays out of his mind and Ickey comes back strong? To me, there are just too many variables at T and Morgan met the needs for 2 starters.  Nothing about that screams lets "go OT in round 1" to me. I could see an Edge or a DT at 19 before I see OT.  I could see a TE or S before an OT--and I (personally) would rather have an OT over DT, Edge, TE, or S--but I do not see the logic.  In fact, CB is a position that resembles OT--who do we have behind our starters and are we happy with Smith-Wade?  A CB would be on the field more than a reserve OT.  How is the Walker at LT situation different than the the Bryce situation? He is basically on a 1-year deal and if he is injured, Forsythe becomes Pickett.  Would you take Simpson in the draft?  Dont get me wrong--I usually agree with you  and I get your point.  I am an OL guru--but I just do not see this particular group of Tackles making us better than Walker.  In addition, I think we can address OT once the Ickey situation clears up.  Short arms, poor run blocking, issues with strength--I am simply not impressed with the OTs.  For clarity, "developmental" refers to players who are still a year or two away from starting.  We are all developmental, but there are prospects who need a season to transition to the pro game. I see 1--maybe 2 OTs who could step into a starting role right now. In college, for example, taking snaps under center requires a different approach than blocking for the shotgun.  There is less to learn if you play a position that does not require much adjustment to transition to the NFL.
×
×
  • Create New...